Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients

Ognjen Gajic, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, André Esteban, Rolf D. Hubmayr, Antonio R Anzueto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

290 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: A single-center retrospective study initial recently identified ventilator settings as a major risk factor for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated patients who do not have ARDS from the outset. We tested this hypothesis in a larger sample of patients prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study on mechanical ventilation. Design and setting: From a large international mechanical ventilation study database we identified patients who required mechanical ventilation for 48 h or more but did not have ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation. We extracted information on demographics, initial severity of illness, ventilator settings and major underlying ARDS risk factors. Primary outcome was development of ARDS after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Measurements and results: Of 3,261 mechanically ventilated patients who did not have ARDS at the outset 205 (6.2%) developed ARDS 48 h or more after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, hypoxemia) and underlying ARDS risk factors (sepsis, trauma, pneumonia) found the development of ARDS to be associated with the initial ventilator settings: high tidal volume (odds ratio 2.6 for tidal volume >700 ml), high peak airway pressure (odds ratio 1.6 for peak airway pressure >30 cmH 2O), and high positive end-expiratory pressure (odds ratio 1.7 for end-expiratory pressure >5 cmH2O). Conclusions: The association with the potentially injurious initial ventilator settings, in particular large tidal volumes, suggests that ARDS in mechanically ventilated patients is in part a preventable complication. This hypothesis needs to be tested in a prospective study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)922-926
Number of pages5
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Mechanical Ventilators
Artificial Respiration
Tidal Volume
Odds Ratio
Pressure
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Multicenter Studies
Sepsis
Pneumonia
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Demography
Databases
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Pulmonary edema, pneumonia
  • Respiration Artificial, adverse effects
  • Respiratory distress syndrome, adult

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients. / Gajic, Ognjen; Frutos-Vivar, Fernando; Esteban, André; Hubmayr, Rolf D.; Anzueto, Antonio R.

In: Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 7, 06.2005, p. 922-926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gajic, Ognjen ; Frutos-Vivar, Fernando ; Esteban, André ; Hubmayr, Rolf D. ; Anzueto, Antonio R. / Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients. In: Intensive Care Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 922-926.
@article{5848a3a5fa994fcd9779b162342207c8,
title = "Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients",
abstract = "Objective: A single-center retrospective study initial recently identified ventilator settings as a major risk factor for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated patients who do not have ARDS from the outset. We tested this hypothesis in a larger sample of patients prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study on mechanical ventilation. Design and setting: From a large international mechanical ventilation study database we identified patients who required mechanical ventilation for 48 h or more but did not have ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation. We extracted information on demographics, initial severity of illness, ventilator settings and major underlying ARDS risk factors. Primary outcome was development of ARDS after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Measurements and results: Of 3,261 mechanically ventilated patients who did not have ARDS at the outset 205 (6.2{\%}) developed ARDS 48 h or more after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, hypoxemia) and underlying ARDS risk factors (sepsis, trauma, pneumonia) found the development of ARDS to be associated with the initial ventilator settings: high tidal volume (odds ratio 2.6 for tidal volume >700 ml), high peak airway pressure (odds ratio 1.6 for peak airway pressure >30 cmH 2O), and high positive end-expiratory pressure (odds ratio 1.7 for end-expiratory pressure >5 cmH2O). Conclusions: The association with the potentially injurious initial ventilator settings, in particular large tidal volumes, suggests that ARDS in mechanically ventilated patients is in part a preventable complication. This hypothesis needs to be tested in a prospective study.",
keywords = "Pulmonary edema, pneumonia, Respiration Artificial, adverse effects, Respiratory distress syndrome, adult",
author = "Ognjen Gajic and Fernando Frutos-Vivar and Andr{\'e} Esteban and Hubmayr, {Rolf D.} and Anzueto, {Antonio R}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00134-005-2625-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "922--926",
journal = "Intensive Care Medicine",
issn = "0342-4642",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients

AU - Gajic, Ognjen

AU - Frutos-Vivar, Fernando

AU - Esteban, André

AU - Hubmayr, Rolf D.

AU - Anzueto, Antonio R

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Objective: A single-center retrospective study initial recently identified ventilator settings as a major risk factor for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated patients who do not have ARDS from the outset. We tested this hypothesis in a larger sample of patients prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study on mechanical ventilation. Design and setting: From a large international mechanical ventilation study database we identified patients who required mechanical ventilation for 48 h or more but did not have ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation. We extracted information on demographics, initial severity of illness, ventilator settings and major underlying ARDS risk factors. Primary outcome was development of ARDS after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Measurements and results: Of 3,261 mechanically ventilated patients who did not have ARDS at the outset 205 (6.2%) developed ARDS 48 h or more after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, hypoxemia) and underlying ARDS risk factors (sepsis, trauma, pneumonia) found the development of ARDS to be associated with the initial ventilator settings: high tidal volume (odds ratio 2.6 for tidal volume >700 ml), high peak airway pressure (odds ratio 1.6 for peak airway pressure >30 cmH 2O), and high positive end-expiratory pressure (odds ratio 1.7 for end-expiratory pressure >5 cmH2O). Conclusions: The association with the potentially injurious initial ventilator settings, in particular large tidal volumes, suggests that ARDS in mechanically ventilated patients is in part a preventable complication. This hypothesis needs to be tested in a prospective study.

AB - Objective: A single-center retrospective study initial recently identified ventilator settings as a major risk factor for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated patients who do not have ARDS from the outset. We tested this hypothesis in a larger sample of patients prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study on mechanical ventilation. Design and setting: From a large international mechanical ventilation study database we identified patients who required mechanical ventilation for 48 h or more but did not have ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation. We extracted information on demographics, initial severity of illness, ventilator settings and major underlying ARDS risk factors. Primary outcome was development of ARDS after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Measurements and results: Of 3,261 mechanically ventilated patients who did not have ARDS at the outset 205 (6.2%) developed ARDS 48 h or more after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, hypoxemia) and underlying ARDS risk factors (sepsis, trauma, pneumonia) found the development of ARDS to be associated with the initial ventilator settings: high tidal volume (odds ratio 2.6 for tidal volume >700 ml), high peak airway pressure (odds ratio 1.6 for peak airway pressure >30 cmH 2O), and high positive end-expiratory pressure (odds ratio 1.7 for end-expiratory pressure >5 cmH2O). Conclusions: The association with the potentially injurious initial ventilator settings, in particular large tidal volumes, suggests that ARDS in mechanically ventilated patients is in part a preventable complication. This hypothesis needs to be tested in a prospective study.

KW - Pulmonary edema, pneumonia

KW - Respiration Artificial, adverse effects

KW - Respiratory distress syndrome, adult

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21744462913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21744462913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00134-005-2625-1

DO - 10.1007/s00134-005-2625-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 15856172

AN - SCOPUS:21744462913

VL - 31

SP - 922

EP - 926

JO - Intensive Care Medicine

JF - Intensive Care Medicine

SN - 0342-4642

IS - 7

ER -