TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity of diabetes self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative
T2 - Comparison with medication inventories and fasting glucose measurements
AU - Margolis, Karen L.
AU - Qi, Lihong
AU - Brzyski, Robert
AU - Bonds, Denise E.
AU - Howard, Barbara V.
AU - Kempainen, Sarah
AU - Liu, Simin
AU - Robinson, Jennifer G.
AU - Safford, Monika M.
AU - Tinker, Lesley T.
AU - Phillips, Lawrence S.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Objective: Although diabetes is conveniently assessed by self-report, few validation studies have been performed. Therefore, we studied whether self-report of prevalent and incident diabetes in Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participants was concordant with other diagnostic evidence of diabetes. Study Design and Setting: A total of 161 808 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 were enrolled at 40 clinical centers in the U.S. in 1993-1998 and followed prospectively. At baseline, prevalent medication treated diabetes was defined as a self-report of physician diagnosis and treatment with insulin or oral antidiabetic drugs. During followup, incident treated diabetes was defined as a self-report of a new physician diagnosis of diabetes treated with insulin or oral drugs. Diabetes self-reports were compared with medication inventories and fasting glucose levels at baseline and during follow-up. Results: At baseline, self-reported treated diabetes was concordant with the medication inventory in 79% of clinical trial, and 77% of observational study participants. Self-reported incident treated diabetes was concordant with the medication inventory in 78% between baseline and Year 1 in the clinical trials, in 62% between Year 1 and Year 3 in the clinical trials, and in 72% between baseline and Year 3 in the observational study. Over similar periods, 99.9% of those who did not report treated diabetes had no oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin in the medication inventory. At baseline, about 3% not reporting diabetes had fasting glucose >126 mg/dl, and 88% of these subjects subsequently reported treated diabetes during 6.9 years of follow-up. Limitations: Incident self-reported diabetes treated by lifestyle alone was not determined in WHI. Medication inventories may have been incomplete and fasting glucose may have been lowered by treatment; therefore, concordance with self-reported treatment or fasting glucose ≥ 126 may have been underestimated. Conclusion: In the WHI, self-reported prevalent and incident diabetes was consistent with medication inventories, and a high proportion of those with undiagnosed diabetes subsequently reported diabetes treatment. Self-reports of 'treated diabetes' are sufficiently accurate to allow use in epidemiologic studies.
AB - Objective: Although diabetes is conveniently assessed by self-report, few validation studies have been performed. Therefore, we studied whether self-report of prevalent and incident diabetes in Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participants was concordant with other diagnostic evidence of diabetes. Study Design and Setting: A total of 161 808 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 were enrolled at 40 clinical centers in the U.S. in 1993-1998 and followed prospectively. At baseline, prevalent medication treated diabetes was defined as a self-report of physician diagnosis and treatment with insulin or oral antidiabetic drugs. During followup, incident treated diabetes was defined as a self-report of a new physician diagnosis of diabetes treated with insulin or oral drugs. Diabetes self-reports were compared with medication inventories and fasting glucose levels at baseline and during follow-up. Results: At baseline, self-reported treated diabetes was concordant with the medication inventory in 79% of clinical trial, and 77% of observational study participants. Self-reported incident treated diabetes was concordant with the medication inventory in 78% between baseline and Year 1 in the clinical trials, in 62% between Year 1 and Year 3 in the clinical trials, and in 72% between baseline and Year 3 in the observational study. Over similar periods, 99.9% of those who did not report treated diabetes had no oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin in the medication inventory. At baseline, about 3% not reporting diabetes had fasting glucose >126 mg/dl, and 88% of these subjects subsequently reported treated diabetes during 6.9 years of follow-up. Limitations: Incident self-reported diabetes treated by lifestyle alone was not determined in WHI. Medication inventories may have been incomplete and fasting glucose may have been lowered by treatment; therefore, concordance with self-reported treatment or fasting glucose ≥ 126 may have been underestimated. Conclusion: In the WHI, self-reported prevalent and incident diabetes was consistent with medication inventories, and a high proportion of those with undiagnosed diabetes subsequently reported diabetes treatment. Self-reports of 'treated diabetes' are sufficiently accurate to allow use in epidemiologic studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54549121500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54549121500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1740774508091749
DO - 10.1177/1740774508091749
M3 - Article
C2 - 18559413
AN - SCOPUS:54549121500
VL - 5
SP - 240
EP - 247
JO - Clinical Trials
JF - Clinical Trials
SN - 1740-7745
IS - 3
ER -