TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity of a telemedicine system for the evaluation of acute-phase retinopathy of prematurity
AU - e-ROP Cooperative Group
AU - Quinn, Graham E.
AU - Ying, Gui Shuang
AU - Daniel, Ebenezer
AU - Hildebrand, P. Lloyd
AU - Ells, Anna
AU - Baumritter, Agnieshka
AU - Kemper, Alex R.
AU - Schron, Eleanor B.
AU - Wade, Kelly
AU - Duros, Trang B.
AU - Erbring, Lisa
AU - Repka, Michael X.
AU - Shepard, Jennifer A.
AU - Donohue, Pamela
AU - Emmert, David
AU - Herring, C. Mark
AU - VanderVeen, Deborah
AU - Johnston, Suzanne
AU - Wu, Carolyn
AU - Mantagos, Jason
AU - Ledoux, Danielle
AU - Winter, Tamar
AU - Weng, Frank
AU - Mansfield, Theresa
AU - Bremer, Don L.
AU - Golden, Richard
AU - McGregor, Mary Lou
AU - Jordan, Catherine Olson
AU - Rogers, David L.
AU - Fellows, Rae R.
AU - Brandt, Suzanne
AU - Mann, Brenda
AU - Wallace, David
AU - Freedman, Sharon
AU - Jones, Sarah K.
AU - Tran-Viet, Du
AU - Young, Rhonda Michelle
AU - Barr, Charles C.
AU - Bhola, Rahul
AU - Douglas, Craig
AU - Fishman, Peggy
AU - Bottorff, Michelle
AU - Hubbuch, Brandi
AU - Keith, Rachel
AU - Bothun, Erick D.
AU - DeBecker, Inge
AU - Anderson, Jill
AU - Holleschau, Ann Marie
AU - Gong, Alice
AU - Harper, Clio Armitage
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: When compared with the criterion standard diagnostic examination, these results provide strong support for the validity of remote evaluation by trained nonphysician readers of digital retinal images taken by trained nonphysician imagers from infants at risk for RW-ROP.INTERVENTIONS: Infants underwent regularly scheduled diagnostic examinations by an ophthalmologist and digital imaging by nonphysician staff using a wide-field digital camera. Ophthalmologists documented findings consistent with referral-warranted (RW) ROP (ie, zone I ROP, stage 3 ROP or worse, or plus disease). A standard 6-image set per eye was sent to a central server and graded by 2 trained, masked, nonphysician readers. A reading supervisor adjudicated disagreements.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The validity of grading retinal image setswas based on the sensitivity and specificity for detecting RW-ROP compared with the criterion standard diagnostic examination.ESULTS A total of 1257 infants (mean birth weight, 864 g; mean gestational age, 27 weeks) underwent a median of 3 sessions of examinations and imaging. Diagnostic examination identified characteristics of RW-ROP in 18.2%of eyes (19.4%of infants). Remote grading of images of an eye at a single session had sensitivity of 81.9% (95%CI, 77.4-85.6) and specificity of 90.1% (95%CI, 87.9-91.8). When both eyes were considered for the presence of RW-ROP, as would routinely be done in a screening, the sensitivity was 90.0%(95%CI, 85.4-93.5), with specificity of 87.0% (95%CI, 84.0-89.5), negative predictive value of 97.3%, and positive predictive value of 62.5%at the observed RW-ROP rate of 19.4%.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational study of premature infants starting at 32 weeks' postmenstrual age was conducted. This study involved 1257 infants with birth weight less than 1251 g in neonatal intensive care units in 13 North American centers enrolled from May 25, 2011, through October 31, 2013.IMPORTANCE: The present strategy to identify infants needing treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requires repeated examinations of at-risk infants by physicians. However, less than 10% ultimately require treatment. Retinal imaging by nonphysicians with remote image interpretation by nonphysicians may provide a more efficient strategy.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a telemedicine system to identify infants who have sufficiently severe ROP to require evaluation by an ophthalmologist.
AB - CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: When compared with the criterion standard diagnostic examination, these results provide strong support for the validity of remote evaluation by trained nonphysician readers of digital retinal images taken by trained nonphysician imagers from infants at risk for RW-ROP.INTERVENTIONS: Infants underwent regularly scheduled diagnostic examinations by an ophthalmologist and digital imaging by nonphysician staff using a wide-field digital camera. Ophthalmologists documented findings consistent with referral-warranted (RW) ROP (ie, zone I ROP, stage 3 ROP or worse, or plus disease). A standard 6-image set per eye was sent to a central server and graded by 2 trained, masked, nonphysician readers. A reading supervisor adjudicated disagreements.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The validity of grading retinal image setswas based on the sensitivity and specificity for detecting RW-ROP compared with the criterion standard diagnostic examination.ESULTS A total of 1257 infants (mean birth weight, 864 g; mean gestational age, 27 weeks) underwent a median of 3 sessions of examinations and imaging. Diagnostic examination identified characteristics of RW-ROP in 18.2%of eyes (19.4%of infants). Remote grading of images of an eye at a single session had sensitivity of 81.9% (95%CI, 77.4-85.6) and specificity of 90.1% (95%CI, 87.9-91.8). When both eyes were considered for the presence of RW-ROP, as would routinely be done in a screening, the sensitivity was 90.0%(95%CI, 85.4-93.5), with specificity of 87.0% (95%CI, 84.0-89.5), negative predictive value of 97.3%, and positive predictive value of 62.5%at the observed RW-ROP rate of 19.4%.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational study of premature infants starting at 32 weeks' postmenstrual age was conducted. This study involved 1257 infants with birth weight less than 1251 g in neonatal intensive care units in 13 North American centers enrolled from May 25, 2011, through October 31, 2013.IMPORTANCE: The present strategy to identify infants needing treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requires repeated examinations of at-risk infants by physicians. However, less than 10% ultimately require treatment. Retinal imaging by nonphysicians with remote image interpretation by nonphysicians may provide a more efficient strategy.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a telemedicine system to identify infants who have sufficiently severe ROP to require evaluation by an ophthalmologist.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908110206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908110206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1604
DO - 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1604
M3 - Article
C2 - 24970095
AN - SCOPUS:84908110206
SN - 2168-6165
VL - 132
SP - 1178
EP - 1184
JO - JAMA Ophthalmology
JF - JAMA Ophthalmology
IS - 10
ER -