Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion

M. J. Simmonds, S. Kumar, E. Lechelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose. Despite the widespread use of spinal mobilization, little is known about the forces used or the accuracy of therapists in estimating the forces they use in administering the technique. The purposes of this study were to quantify the forces used and to determine the accuracy of therapists in applying forces on a mechanical model. Subjects. Ten physical therapists participated. Methods. A spinal model was used to measure applied force and displacements under different conditions of stiffness. The therapists applied oscillatory posteroanterior mobilizations to the model under three different conditions of stiffness. Results. Mean peak forces across grades and stiffness levels ranged between 57.59 and 178.27 N. The forces were generally lower in the least stiff condition. Displacement varied with stiffness and mobilization grade. In the least stiff condition, the mean displacement varied between 2.25 and 3.45 mm for grades 1 to 4, respectively. Conclusion and Discussion. Inter-therapist variability was high, and there was a systematic bias in underestimating the magnitude of applied force and in overestimating motion. The variability in force application and the general overestimation of motion detection may explain the poor reliability of measurements obtained with clinical tests based on motion palpation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-222
Number of pages11
JournalPhysical Therapy
Volume75
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Palpation
Physical Therapists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion. / Simmonds, M. J.; Kumar, S.; Lechelt, E.

In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 75, No. 3, 1995, p. 212-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simmonds, M. J. ; Kumar, S. ; Lechelt, E. / Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion. In: Physical Therapy. 1995 ; Vol. 75, No. 3. pp. 212-222.
@article{c98bff0602224ade879060cdfa251aa3,
title = "Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion",
abstract = "Background and Purpose. Despite the widespread use of spinal mobilization, little is known about the forces used or the accuracy of therapists in estimating the forces they use in administering the technique. The purposes of this study were to quantify the forces used and to determine the accuracy of therapists in applying forces on a mechanical model. Subjects. Ten physical therapists participated. Methods. A spinal model was used to measure applied force and displacements under different conditions of stiffness. The therapists applied oscillatory posteroanterior mobilizations to the model under three different conditions of stiffness. Results. Mean peak forces across grades and stiffness levels ranged between 57.59 and 178.27 N. The forces were generally lower in the least stiff condition. Displacement varied with stiffness and mobilization grade. In the least stiff condition, the mean displacement varied between 2.25 and 3.45 mm for grades 1 to 4, respectively. Conclusion and Discussion. Inter-therapist variability was high, and there was a systematic bias in underestimating the magnitude of applied force and in overestimating motion. The variability in force application and the general overestimation of motion detection may explain the poor reliability of measurements obtained with clinical tests based on motion palpation.",
author = "Simmonds, {M. J.} and S. Kumar and E. Lechelt",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "212--222",
journal = "Physical Therapy",
issn = "0031-9023",
publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion

AU - Simmonds, M. J.

AU - Kumar, S.

AU - Lechelt, E.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Background and Purpose. Despite the widespread use of spinal mobilization, little is known about the forces used or the accuracy of therapists in estimating the forces they use in administering the technique. The purposes of this study were to quantify the forces used and to determine the accuracy of therapists in applying forces on a mechanical model. Subjects. Ten physical therapists participated. Methods. A spinal model was used to measure applied force and displacements under different conditions of stiffness. The therapists applied oscillatory posteroanterior mobilizations to the model under three different conditions of stiffness. Results. Mean peak forces across grades and stiffness levels ranged between 57.59 and 178.27 N. The forces were generally lower in the least stiff condition. Displacement varied with stiffness and mobilization grade. In the least stiff condition, the mean displacement varied between 2.25 and 3.45 mm for grades 1 to 4, respectively. Conclusion and Discussion. Inter-therapist variability was high, and there was a systematic bias in underestimating the magnitude of applied force and in overestimating motion. The variability in force application and the general overestimation of motion detection may explain the poor reliability of measurements obtained with clinical tests based on motion palpation.

AB - Background and Purpose. Despite the widespread use of spinal mobilization, little is known about the forces used or the accuracy of therapists in estimating the forces they use in administering the technique. The purposes of this study were to quantify the forces used and to determine the accuracy of therapists in applying forces on a mechanical model. Subjects. Ten physical therapists participated. Methods. A spinal model was used to measure applied force and displacements under different conditions of stiffness. The therapists applied oscillatory posteroanterior mobilizations to the model under three different conditions of stiffness. Results. Mean peak forces across grades and stiffness levels ranged between 57.59 and 178.27 N. The forces were generally lower in the least stiff condition. Displacement varied with stiffness and mobilization grade. In the least stiff condition, the mean displacement varied between 2.25 and 3.45 mm for grades 1 to 4, respectively. Conclusion and Discussion. Inter-therapist variability was high, and there was a systematic bias in underestimating the magnitude of applied force and in overestimating motion. The variability in force application and the general overestimation of motion detection may explain the poor reliability of measurements obtained with clinical tests based on motion palpation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028943751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028943751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7870752

AN - SCOPUS:0028943751

VL - 75

SP - 212

EP - 222

JO - Physical Therapy

JF - Physical Therapy

SN - 0031-9023

IS - 3

ER -