US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations.

Shawn C. Nessen, Daniel R. Cronk, Jason Edens, Brian J. Eastridge, Todd R. Little, Jason Windsor, Lorne H. Blackbourne, John B. Holcomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: United States Army Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs) consist of twenty personnel and are the Army's smallest surgical units. Currently, they provide the majority of resuscitative surgical care for combat casualties in Afghanistan where the mission of the FST has been further extended to include "split-based operations." The effectiveness of these 10-person teams is unknown and outcome data has not been previously reported in the literature. This article evaluates the effectiveness of one split FST during a 14-month period in remote Afghanistan. METHODS: The primary endpoint was died of wounds (DOW) outcomes among United States Forces, Coalition Afghani Forces, and local national citizens. Mortality was evaluated separately for patients who received a blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints of the study included number of blood products transfused, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-one patients were treated and 327 patients underwent an immediate surgery. The average ISS was 12.05, and the DOW percentage was 2.36%. There were 61 patients with an ISS of greater than 24 (mortality = 23.0%), and 47 patients with an ISS of 16 to 24 (mortality = 2.13%). Nine of 121 patients transfused (7.4%) died. A total of 27 patients required massive blood transfusion and on average received 12.6 units of fresh frozen plasma and 18.2 units of packed red blood cell (ratio 1:1.49). Seven of 27 patients who received massive blood transfusion (25.9%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Small two-surgeon surgical teams can achieve acceptable DOW rates when compared with other larger surgical units currently operating in the Global War on Terror.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalThe Journal of trauma
Volume66
Issue number4 Suppl
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Afghanistan
Injury Severity Score
Blood Transfusion
Wounds and Injuries
Mortality
Surgeons
Military Personnel
Erythrocytes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nessen, S. C., Cronk, D. R., Edens, J., Eastridge, B. J., Little, T. R., Windsor, J., ... Holcomb, J. B. (2009). US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations. The Journal of trauma, 66(4 Suppl).

US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations. / Nessen, Shawn C.; Cronk, Daniel R.; Edens, Jason; Eastridge, Brian J.; Little, Todd R.; Windsor, Jason; Blackbourne, Lorne H.; Holcomb, John B.

In: The Journal of trauma, Vol. 66, No. 4 Suppl, 04.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nessen, SC, Cronk, DR, Edens, J, Eastridge, BJ, Little, TR, Windsor, J, Blackbourne, LH & Holcomb, JB 2009, 'US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations.', The Journal of trauma, vol. 66, no. 4 Suppl.
Nessen SC, Cronk DR, Edens J, Eastridge BJ, Little TR, Windsor J et al. US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations. The Journal of trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4 Suppl).
Nessen, Shawn C. ; Cronk, Daniel R. ; Edens, Jason ; Eastridge, Brian J. ; Little, Todd R. ; Windsor, Jason ; Blackbourne, Lorne H. ; Holcomb, John B. / US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations. In: The Journal of trauma. 2009 ; Vol. 66, No. 4 Suppl.
@article{1e293df4398a42ffa31e04a226b6e779,
title = "US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: United States Army Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs) consist of twenty personnel and are the Army's smallest surgical units. Currently, they provide the majority of resuscitative surgical care for combat casualties in Afghanistan where the mission of the FST has been further extended to include {"}split-based operations.{"} The effectiveness of these 10-person teams is unknown and outcome data has not been previously reported in the literature. This article evaluates the effectiveness of one split FST during a 14-month period in remote Afghanistan. METHODS: The primary endpoint was died of wounds (DOW) outcomes among United States Forces, Coalition Afghani Forces, and local national citizens. Mortality was evaluated separately for patients who received a blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints of the study included number of blood products transfused, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-one patients were treated and 327 patients underwent an immediate surgery. The average ISS was 12.05, and the DOW percentage was 2.36{\%}. There were 61 patients with an ISS of greater than 24 (mortality = 23.0{\%}), and 47 patients with an ISS of 16 to 24 (mortality = 2.13{\%}). Nine of 121 patients transfused (7.4{\%}) died. A total of 27 patients required massive blood transfusion and on average received 12.6 units of fresh frozen plasma and 18.2 units of packed red blood cell (ratio 1:1.49). Seven of 27 patients who received massive blood transfusion (25.9{\%}) died. CONCLUSIONS: Small two-surgeon surgical teams can achieve acceptable DOW rates when compared with other larger surgical units currently operating in the Global War on Terror.",
author = "Nessen, {Shawn C.} and Cronk, {Daniel R.} and Jason Edens and Eastridge, {Brian J.} and Little, {Todd R.} and Jason Windsor and Blackbourne, {Lorne H.} and Holcomb, {John B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4 Suppl",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations.

AU - Nessen, Shawn C.

AU - Cronk, Daniel R.

AU - Edens, Jason

AU - Eastridge, Brian J.

AU - Little, Todd R.

AU - Windsor, Jason

AU - Blackbourne, Lorne H.

AU - Holcomb, John B.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: United States Army Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs) consist of twenty personnel and are the Army's smallest surgical units. Currently, they provide the majority of resuscitative surgical care for combat casualties in Afghanistan where the mission of the FST has been further extended to include "split-based operations." The effectiveness of these 10-person teams is unknown and outcome data has not been previously reported in the literature. This article evaluates the effectiveness of one split FST during a 14-month period in remote Afghanistan. METHODS: The primary endpoint was died of wounds (DOW) outcomes among United States Forces, Coalition Afghani Forces, and local national citizens. Mortality was evaluated separately for patients who received a blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints of the study included number of blood products transfused, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-one patients were treated and 327 patients underwent an immediate surgery. The average ISS was 12.05, and the DOW percentage was 2.36%. There were 61 patients with an ISS of greater than 24 (mortality = 23.0%), and 47 patients with an ISS of 16 to 24 (mortality = 2.13%). Nine of 121 patients transfused (7.4%) died. A total of 27 patients required massive blood transfusion and on average received 12.6 units of fresh frozen plasma and 18.2 units of packed red blood cell (ratio 1:1.49). Seven of 27 patients who received massive blood transfusion (25.9%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Small two-surgeon surgical teams can achieve acceptable DOW rates when compared with other larger surgical units currently operating in the Global War on Terror.

AB - BACKGROUND: United States Army Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs) consist of twenty personnel and are the Army's smallest surgical units. Currently, they provide the majority of resuscitative surgical care for combat casualties in Afghanistan where the mission of the FST has been further extended to include "split-based operations." The effectiveness of these 10-person teams is unknown and outcome data has not been previously reported in the literature. This article evaluates the effectiveness of one split FST during a 14-month period in remote Afghanistan. METHODS: The primary endpoint was died of wounds (DOW) outcomes among United States Forces, Coalition Afghani Forces, and local national citizens. Mortality was evaluated separately for patients who received a blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints of the study included number of blood products transfused, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-one patients were treated and 327 patients underwent an immediate surgery. The average ISS was 12.05, and the DOW percentage was 2.36%. There were 61 patients with an ISS of greater than 24 (mortality = 23.0%), and 47 patients with an ISS of 16 to 24 (mortality = 2.13%). Nine of 121 patients transfused (7.4%) died. A total of 27 patients required massive blood transfusion and on average received 12.6 units of fresh frozen plasma and 18.2 units of packed red blood cell (ratio 1:1.49). Seven of 27 patients who received massive blood transfusion (25.9%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Small two-surgeon surgical teams can achieve acceptable DOW rates when compared with other larger surgical units currently operating in the Global War on Terror.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649201381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649201381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 66

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4 Suppl

ER -