Abstract
Objectives: With the increasing emphasis on evidence-based medicine, the urology literature has seen a rapid growth in the number of high-quality randomized controlled trials along with increased statistical rigor in the reporting of study results. P-values, CI, and number needed to treat (NNT) are becoming increasingly common in the literature. This paper seeks to familiarize the reader with statistical measures commonly used in the evidence-based literature. Materials and Methods: The meaning and appropriate interpretation of these statistical measures is reviewed through the use of a clinical scenario. Results: The reader will be better able to understand such statistical measures and apply them to the critical appraisal of the literature. Conclusions: P-values, CI, and NNT each provide a slightly different estimate of statistical truth. Together, they provide a more complete picture of the true effect observed in a study. An understanding of these measures is essential to the critical appraisal of study results in evidence-based medicine.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 532-535 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Indian Journal of Urology |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2011 |
Keywords
- Confidence intervals
- evidence-based medicine
- number needed to treat
- statistical significance
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Urology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding results: P-values, confidence intervals, and number need to treat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS