TY - JOUR
T1 - Tubal Ligation and Risk of Endometrial Cancer
T2 - Findings from the Women's Health Initiative
AU - Winer, Ira
AU - Lehman, Amy
AU - Wactawski-Wende, Jean
AU - Robinson, Randal
AU - Simon, Michael
AU - Cote, Michele
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by IGCS and ESGO. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Supplemental digital content is available in the text.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Objective Bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) is a common form of birth control in the United States. There are limited, contradictory data examining BTL and the risk of endometrial cancer and none examining type I and type II cancers separately. We investigated the association between BTL and endometrial cancer risk using the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Observational and Dietary Modification Studies. Methods Demographic information and history of BTL were obtained from the baseline questionnaires from 76,483 WHI participants in the Observational and Dietary Modification Studies. Univariable and multivariable models were used to examine the association of BTL with type I and type II endometrial cancers. Results A total of 1137 women were diagnosed with incident endometrial cancer (972 type I and 128 type II) during a mean follow-up of 11.3 years. Overall, 14,499 (19%) women had undergone BTL. There were no statistically significant associations noted between BTL and age at BTL for type I or type II cancers. Conclusions We examined the largest patient cohort to date in an effort to determine the impact of BTL on endometrial cancer risk. In the WHI trial, we observed no overall effect of BTL on the risk of type I or type II endometrial cancer, suggesting that patients undergoing this popular birth control method likely do not have an associated change in their baseline risk for endometrial cancer.
AB - Objective Bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) is a common form of birth control in the United States. There are limited, contradictory data examining BTL and the risk of endometrial cancer and none examining type I and type II cancers separately. We investigated the association between BTL and endometrial cancer risk using the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Observational and Dietary Modification Studies. Methods Demographic information and history of BTL were obtained from the baseline questionnaires from 76,483 WHI participants in the Observational and Dietary Modification Studies. Univariable and multivariable models were used to examine the association of BTL with type I and type II endometrial cancers. Results A total of 1137 women were diagnosed with incident endometrial cancer (972 type I and 128 type II) during a mean follow-up of 11.3 years. Overall, 14,499 (19%) women had undergone BTL. There were no statistically significant associations noted between BTL and age at BTL for type I or type II cancers. Conclusions We examined the largest patient cohort to date in an effort to determine the impact of BTL on endometrial cancer risk. In the WHI trial, we observed no overall effect of BTL on the risk of type I or type II endometrial cancer, suggesting that patients undergoing this popular birth control method likely do not have an associated change in their baseline risk for endometrial cancer.
KW - Endometrial cancer
KW - Tubal ligation
KW - Women's Health Initiative
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962302036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962302036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000651
DO - 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000651
M3 - Article
C2 - 26825831
AN - SCOPUS:84962302036
SN - 1048-891X
VL - 26
SP - 464
EP - 471
JO - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
JF - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
IS - 3
ER -