Treatment of traumatic posterior sternoclavicular dislocations

Gordon I. Groh, Michael A Wirth, Charles A Rockwood Jr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Traumatic posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries are rare, but complications are common and include brachial plexus and vascular injury, esophageal rupture, and death. Materials and methods: The records of 21 patients treated at our institution for a posterior sternoclavicular injury were reviewed. All patients underwent a trial of closed reduction, which was effective in 8 patients (group I). The remaining 13 patients were treated with open reduction and sternoclavicular joint reconstruction (group II). Results: Closed reduction was more likely to be successful (P < .05) in dislocations treated within 10 days of injury. Patients were evaluated by use of the University of California, Los Angeles rating scale. Overall, 18 of 21 patients were graded as good or excellent. Patients treated with either open or closed reduction as their definitive management compared favorably in terms of ratings for pain, strength, and motion. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that closed reduction compares favorably with open reduction. Of patients treated, 38% required only closed reduction as their definitive treatment. In this series early closed reduction was successful and obviated the risks of surgery. Patients who in whom closed reduction failed obtained good results with operative treatment aimed at reconstruction of the costoclavicular ligaments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-113
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Sternoclavicular Joint
Therapeutics
Arm Injuries
Wounds and Injuries
Los Angeles
Brachial Plexus
Vascular System Injuries
Ligaments
Rupture
Pain

Keywords

  • Case Series
  • Closed reduction
  • Hilar decompression
  • Level IV
  • Open reduction
  • Posterior sternoclavicular injury
  • Sternoclavicular reconstruction
  • Trauma
  • Treatment Study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Treatment of traumatic posterior sternoclavicular dislocations. / Groh, Gordon I.; Wirth, Michael A; Rockwood Jr, Charles A.

In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 107-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Groh, Gordon I. ; Wirth, Michael A ; Rockwood Jr, Charles A. / Treatment of traumatic posterior sternoclavicular dislocations. In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 107-113.
@article{a0e583d2b04f47dbbda5336c533c6f05,
title = "Treatment of traumatic posterior sternoclavicular dislocations",
abstract = "Background: Traumatic posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries are rare, but complications are common and include brachial plexus and vascular injury, esophageal rupture, and death. Materials and methods: The records of 21 patients treated at our institution for a posterior sternoclavicular injury were reviewed. All patients underwent a trial of closed reduction, which was effective in 8 patients (group I). The remaining 13 patients were treated with open reduction and sternoclavicular joint reconstruction (group II). Results: Closed reduction was more likely to be successful (P < .05) in dislocations treated within 10 days of injury. Patients were evaluated by use of the University of California, Los Angeles rating scale. Overall, 18 of 21 patients were graded as good or excellent. Patients treated with either open or closed reduction as their definitive management compared favorably in terms of ratings for pain, strength, and motion. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that closed reduction compares favorably with open reduction. Of patients treated, 38{\%} required only closed reduction as their definitive treatment. In this series early closed reduction was successful and obviated the risks of surgery. Patients who in whom closed reduction failed obtained good results with operative treatment aimed at reconstruction of the costoclavicular ligaments.",
keywords = "Case Series, Closed reduction, Hilar decompression, Level IV, Open reduction, Posterior sternoclavicular injury, Sternoclavicular reconstruction, Trauma, Treatment Study",
author = "Groh, {Gordon I.} and Wirth, {Michael A} and {Rockwood Jr}, {Charles A}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2010.03.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "107--113",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of traumatic posterior sternoclavicular dislocations

AU - Groh, Gordon I.

AU - Wirth, Michael A

AU - Rockwood Jr, Charles A

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Background: Traumatic posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries are rare, but complications are common and include brachial plexus and vascular injury, esophageal rupture, and death. Materials and methods: The records of 21 patients treated at our institution for a posterior sternoclavicular injury were reviewed. All patients underwent a trial of closed reduction, which was effective in 8 patients (group I). The remaining 13 patients were treated with open reduction and sternoclavicular joint reconstruction (group II). Results: Closed reduction was more likely to be successful (P < .05) in dislocations treated within 10 days of injury. Patients were evaluated by use of the University of California, Los Angeles rating scale. Overall, 18 of 21 patients were graded as good or excellent. Patients treated with either open or closed reduction as their definitive management compared favorably in terms of ratings for pain, strength, and motion. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that closed reduction compares favorably with open reduction. Of patients treated, 38% required only closed reduction as their definitive treatment. In this series early closed reduction was successful and obviated the risks of surgery. Patients who in whom closed reduction failed obtained good results with operative treatment aimed at reconstruction of the costoclavicular ligaments.

AB - Background: Traumatic posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries are rare, but complications are common and include brachial plexus and vascular injury, esophageal rupture, and death. Materials and methods: The records of 21 patients treated at our institution for a posterior sternoclavicular injury were reviewed. All patients underwent a trial of closed reduction, which was effective in 8 patients (group I). The remaining 13 patients were treated with open reduction and sternoclavicular joint reconstruction (group II). Results: Closed reduction was more likely to be successful (P < .05) in dislocations treated within 10 days of injury. Patients were evaluated by use of the University of California, Los Angeles rating scale. Overall, 18 of 21 patients were graded as good or excellent. Patients treated with either open or closed reduction as their definitive management compared favorably in terms of ratings for pain, strength, and motion. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that closed reduction compares favorably with open reduction. Of patients treated, 38% required only closed reduction as their definitive treatment. In this series early closed reduction was successful and obviated the risks of surgery. Patients who in whom closed reduction failed obtained good results with operative treatment aimed at reconstruction of the costoclavicular ligaments.

KW - Case Series

KW - Closed reduction

KW - Hilar decompression

KW - Level IV

KW - Open reduction

KW - Posterior sternoclavicular injury

KW - Sternoclavicular reconstruction

KW - Trauma

KW - Treatment Study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649826182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649826182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2010.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2010.03.009

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 107

EP - 113

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 1

ER -