Transplant certification and quality assessment: Time to take the front line?

Janet Tuttle-Newhall, Krista Lentine, David Axelrod, Landon Ware, Jennifer Milton, Mark Schnitzler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the beginning of the past decade, a series of highly publicized events led the general public to question the ability of the transplant community to effectively police itself. Common to the events was the perception that insufficient regulation of the transplant community allowed both unintentional errors and, rarely, purposeful violations of policy, to affect the safety and justice of organ allocation and transplant practice. The goal of this article is to discuss the resulting regulatory responses to these events and to highlight one transplant center's experience with the current external review process. The potential benefits of using process control charts to prospectively monitoring a center's outcomes, as well as the benefits of implementing procedures that ensure the quality of publically reported data, are described. Specifically, the critical need for each center to understand the components, limitations, and implications of public outcome reporting and to define processes that promote real time self-evaluation and quality improvement are demonstrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-212
Number of pages7
JournalProgress in Transplantation
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Certification
Transplants
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Aptitude
Social Justice
Police
Quality Improvement
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Tuttle-Newhall, J., Lentine, K., Axelrod, D., Ware, L., Milton, J., & Schnitzler, M. (2013). Transplant certification and quality assessment: Time to take the front line? Progress in Transplantation, 23(3), 206-212. https://doi.org/10.7182/pit2013193

Transplant certification and quality assessment : Time to take the front line? / Tuttle-Newhall, Janet; Lentine, Krista; Axelrod, David; Ware, Landon; Milton, Jennifer; Schnitzler, Mark.

In: Progress in Transplantation, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 206-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tuttle-Newhall, J, Lentine, K, Axelrod, D, Ware, L, Milton, J & Schnitzler, M 2013, 'Transplant certification and quality assessment: Time to take the front line?', Progress in Transplantation, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 206-212. https://doi.org/10.7182/pit2013193
Tuttle-Newhall J, Lentine K, Axelrod D, Ware L, Milton J, Schnitzler M. Transplant certification and quality assessment: Time to take the front line? Progress in Transplantation. 2013 Sep 1;23(3):206-212. https://doi.org/10.7182/pit2013193
Tuttle-Newhall, Janet ; Lentine, Krista ; Axelrod, David ; Ware, Landon ; Milton, Jennifer ; Schnitzler, Mark. / Transplant certification and quality assessment : Time to take the front line?. In: Progress in Transplantation. 2013 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 206-212.
@article{f644ddce8acf4b34b4addace348d85a0,
title = "Transplant certification and quality assessment: Time to take the front line?",
abstract = "In the beginning of the past decade, a series of highly publicized events led the general public to question the ability of the transplant community to effectively police itself. Common to the events was the perception that insufficient regulation of the transplant community allowed both unintentional errors and, rarely, purposeful violations of policy, to affect the safety and justice of organ allocation and transplant practice. The goal of this article is to discuss the resulting regulatory responses to these events and to highlight one transplant center's experience with the current external review process. The potential benefits of using process control charts to prospectively monitoring a center's outcomes, as well as the benefits of implementing procedures that ensure the quality of publically reported data, are described. Specifically, the critical need for each center to understand the components, limitations, and implications of public outcome reporting and to define processes that promote real time self-evaluation and quality improvement are demonstrated.",
author = "Janet Tuttle-Newhall and Krista Lentine and David Axelrod and Landon Ware and Jennifer Milton and Mark Schnitzler",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7182/pit2013193",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "206--212",
journal = "Progress in Transplantation",
issn = "1526-9248",
publisher = "InnoVision Communications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transplant certification and quality assessment

T2 - Time to take the front line?

AU - Tuttle-Newhall, Janet

AU - Lentine, Krista

AU - Axelrod, David

AU - Ware, Landon

AU - Milton, Jennifer

AU - Schnitzler, Mark

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - In the beginning of the past decade, a series of highly publicized events led the general public to question the ability of the transplant community to effectively police itself. Common to the events was the perception that insufficient regulation of the transplant community allowed both unintentional errors and, rarely, purposeful violations of policy, to affect the safety and justice of organ allocation and transplant practice. The goal of this article is to discuss the resulting regulatory responses to these events and to highlight one transplant center's experience with the current external review process. The potential benefits of using process control charts to prospectively monitoring a center's outcomes, as well as the benefits of implementing procedures that ensure the quality of publically reported data, are described. Specifically, the critical need for each center to understand the components, limitations, and implications of public outcome reporting and to define processes that promote real time self-evaluation and quality improvement are demonstrated.

AB - In the beginning of the past decade, a series of highly publicized events led the general public to question the ability of the transplant community to effectively police itself. Common to the events was the perception that insufficient regulation of the transplant community allowed both unintentional errors and, rarely, purposeful violations of policy, to affect the safety and justice of organ allocation and transplant practice. The goal of this article is to discuss the resulting regulatory responses to these events and to highlight one transplant center's experience with the current external review process. The potential benefits of using process control charts to prospectively monitoring a center's outcomes, as well as the benefits of implementing procedures that ensure the quality of publically reported data, are described. Specifically, the critical need for each center to understand the components, limitations, and implications of public outcome reporting and to define processes that promote real time self-evaluation and quality improvement are demonstrated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883434504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883434504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7182/pit2013193

DO - 10.7182/pit2013193

M3 - Article

C2 - 23996938

AN - SCOPUS:84883434504

VL - 23

SP - 206

EP - 212

JO - Progress in Transplantation

JF - Progress in Transplantation

SN - 1526-9248

IS - 3

ER -