TY - JOUR
T1 - Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance for chemicals, foods, and drugs
T2 - assessing patterns of exposure behind a global phenomenon
AU - Masri, Shahir
AU - Miller, Claudia S.
AU - Palmer, Raymond F.
AU - Ashford, Nicholas
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Carlos Jaen, Chairman of the Dept of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Texas Health Science Center, for his support.
Funding Information:
Although TILT was described only recently, reports of TILT-like illness date back much earlier [, ]. Initially, the condition appeared restricted to North America. However, a study of nine European countries supported by the European Commission documented parallel observations in 1995 [, ]. Interestingly, this cross-country study comparing different presentations of “chemical sensitivity” also revealed different initiating events for chemical sensitivity in each of the nine countries, providing evidence for the two-step disease process that Miller [] described as TILT. Given the abundance of acronyms that accompany the description and discussion of chemical intolerance and environmental chemical exposures that appear in this paper, a list of acronym definitions can be found in Table .
Funding Information:
This work was funded by a grant from the Marilyn Brachman Hoffman Foundation, Fort Worth, Texas (TX).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: Despite 15–36% of the U.S. population reporting Chemical Intolerances (CI) or sensitivity, the condition has been overlooked in medicine and public health. CI is characterized by multisystem symptoms and new-onset intolerances that develop in a subset of individuals following a major chemical exposure event or repeated low-level exposures. While Toxicant-Induced Loss of Tolerance (TILT) is a two-stage disease mechanism proposed to explain CI, less is known about the exposures that initiate the disease, than about the intolerances that have been documented. Methods: We reviewed eight major exposure events that preceded onset of chemical intolerance in groups of individuals sharing the same exposure. Our goal was to identify the chemicals and/or groups of chemicals that were most pervasive during each exposure event as well as identify the concentrations of key chemicals involved in each exposure event and the proportions of exposed individuals who ultimately developed TILT following exposure. Case studies we selected for review included (1) workers at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) headquarters during renovations; (2) Gulf War veterans; (3) pesticide exposure among casino workers; (4) exposure to aircraft oil fumes; (5) the World Trade Center tragedy; (6) surgical implants; (7) moldy environments; and (8) tunnel workers exposed to solvents. Results: Mixed volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), followed by pesticides and combustion products were most prevalent across TILT initiation events. As a broader category, synthetic organic chemicals and their combustion products were the primary exposures associated with chemical intolerance. Such chemicals included pesticides, peroxides, nerve agents, anti-nerve agent drugs, lubricants and additives, xylene, benzene, and acetone. Conclusion: A select group of exposures were predominant in several major initiating events, suggesting their potential role in TILT initiation. Such insights are useful to public health scientists, physicians, and policymakers seeking to minimize harmful exposures and prevent future disease.
AB - Background: Despite 15–36% of the U.S. population reporting Chemical Intolerances (CI) or sensitivity, the condition has been overlooked in medicine and public health. CI is characterized by multisystem symptoms and new-onset intolerances that develop in a subset of individuals following a major chemical exposure event or repeated low-level exposures. While Toxicant-Induced Loss of Tolerance (TILT) is a two-stage disease mechanism proposed to explain CI, less is known about the exposures that initiate the disease, than about the intolerances that have been documented. Methods: We reviewed eight major exposure events that preceded onset of chemical intolerance in groups of individuals sharing the same exposure. Our goal was to identify the chemicals and/or groups of chemicals that were most pervasive during each exposure event as well as identify the concentrations of key chemicals involved in each exposure event and the proportions of exposed individuals who ultimately developed TILT following exposure. Case studies we selected for review included (1) workers at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) headquarters during renovations; (2) Gulf War veterans; (3) pesticide exposure among casino workers; (4) exposure to aircraft oil fumes; (5) the World Trade Center tragedy; (6) surgical implants; (7) moldy environments; and (8) tunnel workers exposed to solvents. Results: Mixed volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), followed by pesticides and combustion products were most prevalent across TILT initiation events. As a broader category, synthetic organic chemicals and their combustion products were the primary exposures associated with chemical intolerance. Such chemicals included pesticides, peroxides, nerve agents, anti-nerve agent drugs, lubricants and additives, xylene, benzene, and acetone. Conclusion: A select group of exposures were predominant in several major initiating events, suggesting their potential role in TILT initiation. Such insights are useful to public health scientists, physicians, and policymakers seeking to minimize harmful exposures and prevent future disease.
KW - Chemical intolerance
KW - Environment
KW - Exposure
KW - Multiple chemical sensitivity
KW - TILT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107001270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107001270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12302-021-00504-z
DO - 10.1186/s12302-021-00504-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107001270
SN - 2190-4707
VL - 33
JO - Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung
JF - Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung
IS - 1
M1 - 65
ER -