TY - JOUR
T1 - Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Cages Versus Uncoated Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Spinal Fusion
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Mariscal, Gonzalo
AU - Vyas, Praveer S.
AU - Cheng, Boyle C.
AU - Arts, Jacobus J.
AU - Hoelen, Thomay Claire A.
AU - Xu, Chen
AU - Chaput, Christopher D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies was performed to compare the fusion rates, functional outcomes, and complications between Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone (TiPEEK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. Methods: Four databases were systematically searched according to PRISMA. Adult patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusion with TiPEEK or PEEK cages were included in the study. Studies that reported radiographic fusion and functional or complication outcomes were also included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and MINORS criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2, and random effects were used to analyze the heterogeneity. Results: 8 studies (n = 670) were analyzed. TiPEEK showed a significantly higher overall fusion rate (OR 1.83, 95% CI: 1.18-2.83). TiPEEK cages presented significantly higher fusion rates at 6 months (OR 2.52, 95% CI: 1.11 to 5.72), but there were no significant differences at 12 months (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.73). No differences were observed in the global ODI (SMD -0.04, 95% CI: −0.15-0.06). There were no significant differences regarding overall subsidence (OR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.07), screw complications (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.30-5.27) or reoperations (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.11-3.37). Conclusions: The results from this study suggest that TiPEEK cages may demonstrate earlier fusion as compared to PEEK cages, particularly at 6 months. However, the functional outcomes and safety profiles were comparable.
AB - Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies was performed to compare the fusion rates, functional outcomes, and complications between Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone (TiPEEK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. Methods: Four databases were systematically searched according to PRISMA. Adult patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusion with TiPEEK or PEEK cages were included in the study. Studies that reported radiographic fusion and functional or complication outcomes were also included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and MINORS criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2, and random effects were used to analyze the heterogeneity. Results: 8 studies (n = 670) were analyzed. TiPEEK showed a significantly higher overall fusion rate (OR 1.83, 95% CI: 1.18-2.83). TiPEEK cages presented significantly higher fusion rates at 6 months (OR 2.52, 95% CI: 1.11 to 5.72), but there were no significant differences at 12 months (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.73). No differences were observed in the global ODI (SMD -0.04, 95% CI: −0.15-0.06). There were no significant differences regarding overall subsidence (OR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.07), screw complications (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.30-5.27) or reoperations (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.11-3.37). Conclusions: The results from this study suggest that TiPEEK cages may demonstrate earlier fusion as compared to PEEK cages, particularly at 6 months. However, the functional outcomes and safety profiles were comparable.
KW - PEEK
KW - coated
KW - meta-analysis
KW - polyetheretherketone
KW - spinal fusion
KW - titanium
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007434540
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105007434540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/21925682251336716
DO - 10.1177/21925682251336716
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40459546
AN - SCOPUS:105007434540
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 15
SP - 3479
EP - 3494
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 7
ER -