Three-dimensional laser imaging system for measuring wound geometry

R. Brian Smith, William E Rogers, Gleb P. Tolstykh, Nicolas E Walsh, Merritt G Davis, Leonid Bunegin, R. Lee Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objective: A low cost laser imager was designed and fabricated for measurement of wound geometry. Methods: The accuracy of the imager was validated using reference depressions of known dimensions. Perimeter, area, and volume were compared to planimetric and packing techniques on simulated wound models. Results: Wound tracing and alginate measurement methods required approximately 20 times longer for the reference standards, and 11 times longer for the simulated wounds than with the laser scanning method (LSM). LSM consistently overestimated the reference perimeter by 0.73 ± 0.20 cm and the area by 0.98 ± 0.62 cm2. Volume estimates were not statistically different. The tracing method underestimated the perimeter by 0.34 ± 0.27 cm and the area by 1.07 ± 1.09 cm2. Volume measurements by the alginate method were not statistically different. The perimeters of the simulated wounds averaged 1.29 ± 0.27 cm greater using the LSM than obtained by the tracing method, and areas greater by 2.02 ± 1.30 cm2. Volume scans averaged 1.04 ± 0.61 cm3 greater than by the alginate method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-93
Number of pages7
JournalLasers in Surgery and Medicine
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Three-Dimensional Imaging
Lasers
Wounds and Injuries
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Area
  • Perimeter
  • Volume
  • Wound care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Three-dimensional laser imaging system for measuring wound geometry. / Smith, R. Brian; Rogers, William E; Tolstykh, Gleb P.; Walsh, Nicolas E; Davis, Merritt G; Bunegin, Leonid; Williams, R. Lee.

In: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1998, p. 87-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, R. Brian ; Rogers, William E ; Tolstykh, Gleb P. ; Walsh, Nicolas E ; Davis, Merritt G ; Bunegin, Leonid ; Williams, R. Lee. / Three-dimensional laser imaging system for measuring wound geometry. In: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 87-93.
@article{fc576b80c4b144cb95d4d7845fd37083,
title = "Three-dimensional laser imaging system for measuring wound geometry",
abstract = "Background and Objective: A low cost laser imager was designed and fabricated for measurement of wound geometry. Methods: The accuracy of the imager was validated using reference depressions of known dimensions. Perimeter, area, and volume were compared to planimetric and packing techniques on simulated wound models. Results: Wound tracing and alginate measurement methods required approximately 20 times longer for the reference standards, and 11 times longer for the simulated wounds than with the laser scanning method (LSM). LSM consistently overestimated the reference perimeter by 0.73 ± 0.20 cm and the area by 0.98 ± 0.62 cm2. Volume estimates were not statistically different. The tracing method underestimated the perimeter by 0.34 ± 0.27 cm and the area by 1.07 ± 1.09 cm2. Volume measurements by the alginate method were not statistically different. The perimeters of the simulated wounds averaged 1.29 ± 0.27 cm greater using the LSM than obtained by the tracing method, and areas greater by 2.02 ± 1.30 cm2. Volume scans averaged 1.04 ± 0.61 cm3 greater than by the alginate method.",
keywords = "Area, Perimeter, Volume, Wound care",
author = "Smith, {R. Brian} and Rogers, {William E} and Tolstykh, {Gleb P.} and Walsh, {Nicolas E} and Davis, {Merritt G} and Leonid Bunegin and Williams, {R. Lee}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1998)23:2<87::AID-LSM6>3.0.CO;2-R",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "87--93",
journal = "Lasers in Surgery and Medicine",
issn = "0196-8092",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional laser imaging system for measuring wound geometry

AU - Smith, R. Brian

AU - Rogers, William E

AU - Tolstykh, Gleb P.

AU - Walsh, Nicolas E

AU - Davis, Merritt G

AU - Bunegin, Leonid

AU - Williams, R. Lee

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Background and Objective: A low cost laser imager was designed and fabricated for measurement of wound geometry. Methods: The accuracy of the imager was validated using reference depressions of known dimensions. Perimeter, area, and volume were compared to planimetric and packing techniques on simulated wound models. Results: Wound tracing and alginate measurement methods required approximately 20 times longer for the reference standards, and 11 times longer for the simulated wounds than with the laser scanning method (LSM). LSM consistently overestimated the reference perimeter by 0.73 ± 0.20 cm and the area by 0.98 ± 0.62 cm2. Volume estimates were not statistically different. The tracing method underestimated the perimeter by 0.34 ± 0.27 cm and the area by 1.07 ± 1.09 cm2. Volume measurements by the alginate method were not statistically different. The perimeters of the simulated wounds averaged 1.29 ± 0.27 cm greater using the LSM than obtained by the tracing method, and areas greater by 2.02 ± 1.30 cm2. Volume scans averaged 1.04 ± 0.61 cm3 greater than by the alginate method.

AB - Background and Objective: A low cost laser imager was designed and fabricated for measurement of wound geometry. Methods: The accuracy of the imager was validated using reference depressions of known dimensions. Perimeter, area, and volume were compared to planimetric and packing techniques on simulated wound models. Results: Wound tracing and alginate measurement methods required approximately 20 times longer for the reference standards, and 11 times longer for the simulated wounds than with the laser scanning method (LSM). LSM consistently overestimated the reference perimeter by 0.73 ± 0.20 cm and the area by 0.98 ± 0.62 cm2. Volume estimates were not statistically different. The tracing method underestimated the perimeter by 0.34 ± 0.27 cm and the area by 1.07 ± 1.09 cm2. Volume measurements by the alginate method were not statistically different. The perimeters of the simulated wounds averaged 1.29 ± 0.27 cm greater using the LSM than obtained by the tracing method, and areas greater by 2.02 ± 1.30 cm2. Volume scans averaged 1.04 ± 0.61 cm3 greater than by the alginate method.

KW - Area

KW - Perimeter

KW - Volume

KW - Wound care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031720042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031720042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1998)23:2<87::AID-LSM6>3.0.CO;2-R

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1998)23:2<87::AID-LSM6>3.0.CO;2-R

M3 - Article

C2 - 9738543

AN - SCOPUS:0031720042

VL - 23

SP - 87

EP - 93

JO - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

JF - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

SN - 0196-8092

IS - 2

ER -