The validity of self-rated health as a measure of health status among young military personnel: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey

Christopher K. Haddock, Walker S.C. Poston, Sara A. Pyle, Robert C. Klesges, Mark W. Vander Weg, Alan Peterson, Margaret Debon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Single item questions about self ratings of overall health status are widely used in both military and civilian surveys. Limited information is available to date that examines what relationships exist between self-rated health, health status and health related behaviors among relatively young, healthy individuals. Methods: The current study uses the population of active duty United States Air Force recruits (N = 31,108). Participants completed surveys that asked about health behaviors and health states and were rated their health on a continuum from poor to excellent. Results: Ratings of health were consistently lower for those who used tobacco (F = 241.7, p < .001), reported binge drinking (F = 69.0, p < .001), reported drinking and driving (F = 19.4, p < .001), reported taking health risks (F = 109.4, p < .001), were depressed (F = 256.1, p < .001) and were overweight (F = 39.5, p < .001). Conclusion: Given the consistent relationship between self-rated overall health and factors important to military health and fitness, self-rated health appears to be a valid measure of health status among young military troops.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number57
JournalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 29 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The validity of self-rated health as a measure of health status among young military personnel: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this