TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of non-insulin anti-diabetic agents to improve glycemia without hypoglycemia in the hospital setting
T2 - Focus on incretins
AU - Schwartz, Stanley
AU - Defronzo, Ralph A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest Stanley Schwartz serves on the Advisory Boards for Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra-Zeneca, Amylin, Santarus, J&J, Merck, Sanofi-Aventis, Genesis Biotechnology Group, Takeda. He serves on the Speaker’s Bureaus for Lilly, Amylin, Santarus, Merck, Sanofi-Aventis, Novo-Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astra-Zeneca, Abbvie, Takeda. He has received grant support from CHOP-NIH for Genetics of LADA. He has received honoraria from Delaware ACP, N. Car. AACE. Ralph A. DeFronzo serves on the Advisory Boards: Amylin, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lexicon, Novo-Nordisk, Janssen. He serves on the Speaker’s Bureaus for Novo-Nordisk, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novo-Nordisk. He has grants from Amylin, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Patients with hyperglycemia in hospital have increased adverse outcomes compared with patients with normoglycemia, and the pathophysiological causes seem relatively well understood. Thus, a rationale for excellent glycemic control exists. Benefits of control with intensive insulin regimes are highly likely based on multiple published studies. However, hypoglycemia frequency increases and adverse outcomes of hypoglycemia accrue. This has resulted in a 'push' for therapeutic nihilism, accepting higher glycemic levels to avoid hypoglycemia. One would ideally prefer to optimize glycemia, treating hyperglycemia while minimizing or avoiding hypoglycemia. Thus, one would welcome therapies and processes of care to optimize this benefit/ risk ratio. We review the logic and early studies that suggest that incretin therapy use in-hospital can achieve this ideal. We strongly urge randomized prospective controlled studies to test our proposal and we offer a process of care to facilitate this research and their use in our hospitalized patients.
AB - Patients with hyperglycemia in hospital have increased adverse outcomes compared with patients with normoglycemia, and the pathophysiological causes seem relatively well understood. Thus, a rationale for excellent glycemic control exists. Benefits of control with intensive insulin regimes are highly likely based on multiple published studies. However, hypoglycemia frequency increases and adverse outcomes of hypoglycemia accrue. This has resulted in a 'push' for therapeutic nihilism, accepting higher glycemic levels to avoid hypoglycemia. One would ideally prefer to optimize glycemia, treating hyperglycemia while minimizing or avoiding hypoglycemia. Thus, one would welcome therapies and processes of care to optimize this benefit/ risk ratio. We review the logic and early studies that suggest that incretin therapy use in-hospital can achieve this ideal. We strongly urge randomized prospective controlled studies to test our proposal and we offer a process of care to facilitate this research and their use in our hospitalized patients.
KW - DPP-4 inhibitors
KW - GLP-1 receptor agonists
KW - Glycemia
KW - Hypoglycemia
KW - In-hospital diabetes control
KW - Incretins
KW - Intensive insulin therapy
KW - Noninsulin anti-diabetic agents
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84893200678
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84893200678#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s11892-013-0466-9
DO - 10.1007/s11892-013-0466-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 24515252
AN - SCOPUS:84893200678
SN - 1534-4827
VL - 14
JO - Current Diabetes Reports
JF - Current Diabetes Reports
IS - 3
M1 - 466
ER -