The unproven utility of the preoperative urinalysis: Economic evaluation

V. A. Lawrence, A. Gafni, M. Gross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The clinical effectiveness of the preoperative urinalysis is unproven, yet it is routinely obtained before surgery. To determine if the routine urinalysis might be economically beneficial, we evaluated its cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit. In the setting of elective clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee procedures, we estimated that: (1) nearly U.S. $7,000,000 is spent annually on preoperative urinalyses and associated costs; (2) given the best estimate of the increase in risk of wound infection attributable to urinary tract infection, 4.58 wound infections may be prevented annually, at a cost of $1,500,000 per wound infection prevented; (3) the cost of treating additional cases of wound infection, given no preoperative urinalysis, is approximately five hundred-fold less than the cost of screening with routine urinalyses. We conclude that the routine preoperative urinalysis is clinically and economically unsound before clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee surgery and probably before other types of clean-wound surgery. For this relatively inexpensive test, aggregate costs are disproportionately high and appear to outweigh clinical benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1185-1192
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume42
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Urinalysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Wound Infection
Costs and Cost Analysis
Knee
Wounds and Injuries
Urinary Tract Infections

Keywords

  • Cost-benefit
  • Preoperative screening
  • Urinalysis
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Wound infection Cost-effectiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The unproven utility of the preoperative urinalysis : Economic evaluation. / Lawrence, V. A.; Gafni, A.; Gross, M.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 42, No. 12, 1989, p. 1185-1192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lawrence, V. A. ; Gafni, A. ; Gross, M. / The unproven utility of the preoperative urinalysis : Economic evaluation. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1989 ; Vol. 42, No. 12. pp. 1185-1192.
@article{eb5ed7277355456e990b07af83691b59,
title = "The unproven utility of the preoperative urinalysis: Economic evaluation",
abstract = "The clinical effectiveness of the preoperative urinalysis is unproven, yet it is routinely obtained before surgery. To determine if the routine urinalysis might be economically beneficial, we evaluated its cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit. In the setting of elective clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee procedures, we estimated that: (1) nearly U.S. $7,000,000 is spent annually on preoperative urinalyses and associated costs; (2) given the best estimate of the increase in risk of wound infection attributable to urinary tract infection, 4.58 wound infections may be prevented annually, at a cost of $1,500,000 per wound infection prevented; (3) the cost of treating additional cases of wound infection, given no preoperative urinalysis, is approximately five hundred-fold less than the cost of screening with routine urinalyses. We conclude that the routine preoperative urinalysis is clinically and economically unsound before clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee surgery and probably before other types of clean-wound surgery. For this relatively inexpensive test, aggregate costs are disproportionately high and appear to outweigh clinical benefits.",
keywords = "Cost-benefit, Preoperative screening, Urinalysis, Urinary tract infection, Wound infection Cost-effectiveness",
author = "Lawrence, {V. A.} and A. Gafni and M. Gross",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(89)90117-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1185--1192",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unproven utility of the preoperative urinalysis

T2 - Economic evaluation

AU - Lawrence, V. A.

AU - Gafni, A.

AU - Gross, M.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - The clinical effectiveness of the preoperative urinalysis is unproven, yet it is routinely obtained before surgery. To determine if the routine urinalysis might be economically beneficial, we evaluated its cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit. In the setting of elective clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee procedures, we estimated that: (1) nearly U.S. $7,000,000 is spent annually on preoperative urinalyses and associated costs; (2) given the best estimate of the increase in risk of wound infection attributable to urinary tract infection, 4.58 wound infections may be prevented annually, at a cost of $1,500,000 per wound infection prevented; (3) the cost of treating additional cases of wound infection, given no preoperative urinalysis, is approximately five hundred-fold less than the cost of screening with routine urinalyses. We conclude that the routine preoperative urinalysis is clinically and economically unsound before clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee surgery and probably before other types of clean-wound surgery. For this relatively inexpensive test, aggregate costs are disproportionately high and appear to outweigh clinical benefits.

AB - The clinical effectiveness of the preoperative urinalysis is unproven, yet it is routinely obtained before surgery. To determine if the routine urinalysis might be economically beneficial, we evaluated its cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit. In the setting of elective clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee procedures, we estimated that: (1) nearly U.S. $7,000,000 is spent annually on preoperative urinalyses and associated costs; (2) given the best estimate of the increase in risk of wound infection attributable to urinary tract infection, 4.58 wound infections may be prevented annually, at a cost of $1,500,000 per wound infection prevented; (3) the cost of treating additional cases of wound infection, given no preoperative urinalysis, is approximately five hundred-fold less than the cost of screening with routine urinalyses. We conclude that the routine preoperative urinalysis is clinically and economically unsound before clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee surgery and probably before other types of clean-wound surgery. For this relatively inexpensive test, aggregate costs are disproportionately high and appear to outweigh clinical benefits.

KW - Cost-benefit

KW - Preoperative screening

KW - Urinalysis

KW - Urinary tract infection

KW - Wound infection Cost-effectiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024810918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024810918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90117-0

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90117-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 2511275

AN - SCOPUS:0024810918

VL - 42

SP - 1185

EP - 1192

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 12

ER -