The role of biofeedback in the operant modification of human heart rate

John P. Hatch, Robert J. Gatchel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent literature on the role played by biofeedback in the modification of human heart rate is reviewed. Emphasis is placed on research pertinent to the issue of whether biofeedback is more productively conceived as a reinforcer of an operant response or as a source of information enabling the development of a voluntary motor skill. Criticisms of the operant paradigm are answered, and limitations of the motor skills analogy are discussed. It is concluded that the operant conditioning paradigm best accounts for most available data on the role of biofeedback in heart rate control, and that it is superior to the motor skills model because it is more parsimonious and makes fewer untestable assumptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-167
Number of pages29
JournalBiofeedback and Self-Regulation
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1981

Fingerprint

Motor Skills
heart rate
Heart Rate
operant conditioning
Operant Conditioning
information sources
Research
Biofeedback (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

The role of biofeedback in the operant modification of human heart rate. / Hatch, John P.; Gatchel, Robert J.

In: Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, Vol. 6, No. 2, 06.1981, p. 139-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hatch, John P. ; Gatchel, Robert J. / The role of biofeedback in the operant modification of human heart rate. In: Biofeedback and Self-Regulation. 1981 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 139-167.
@article{5bc3d5256b354e5f995c6c1f60507332,
title = "The role of biofeedback in the operant modification of human heart rate",
abstract = "The recent literature on the role played by biofeedback in the modification of human heart rate is reviewed. Emphasis is placed on research pertinent to the issue of whether biofeedback is more productively conceived as a reinforcer of an operant response or as a source of information enabling the development of a voluntary motor skill. Criticisms of the operant paradigm are answered, and limitations of the motor skills analogy are discussed. It is concluded that the operant conditioning paradigm best accounts for most available data on the role of biofeedback in heart rate control, and that it is superior to the motor skills model because it is more parsimonious and makes fewer untestable assumptions.",
author = "Hatch, {John P.} and Gatchel, {Robert J.}",
year = "1981",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF00998866",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "139--167",
journal = "Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback",
issn = "1090-0586",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of biofeedback in the operant modification of human heart rate

AU - Hatch, John P.

AU - Gatchel, Robert J.

PY - 1981/6

Y1 - 1981/6

N2 - The recent literature on the role played by biofeedback in the modification of human heart rate is reviewed. Emphasis is placed on research pertinent to the issue of whether biofeedback is more productively conceived as a reinforcer of an operant response or as a source of information enabling the development of a voluntary motor skill. Criticisms of the operant paradigm are answered, and limitations of the motor skills analogy are discussed. It is concluded that the operant conditioning paradigm best accounts for most available data on the role of biofeedback in heart rate control, and that it is superior to the motor skills model because it is more parsimonious and makes fewer untestable assumptions.

AB - The recent literature on the role played by biofeedback in the modification of human heart rate is reviewed. Emphasis is placed on research pertinent to the issue of whether biofeedback is more productively conceived as a reinforcer of an operant response or as a source of information enabling the development of a voluntary motor skill. Criticisms of the operant paradigm are answered, and limitations of the motor skills analogy are discussed. It is concluded that the operant conditioning paradigm best accounts for most available data on the role of biofeedback in heart rate control, and that it is superior to the motor skills model because it is more parsimonious and makes fewer untestable assumptions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019862643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019862643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00998866

DO - 10.1007/BF00998866

M3 - Article

C2 - 7260185

AN - SCOPUS:0019862643

VL - 6

SP - 139

EP - 167

JO - Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback

JF - Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback

SN - 1090-0586

IS - 2

ER -