The Risks of Lone Atrial Fibrillation

David H. Spodick, Palle Petersen, Gudrun Boysen, Henry I. Bussey, Raylene M. Rospond, Christine M. Quandt, Robert L. Talbert, Bernard J. Gersh, Michael D. McGoon, Stephen L. Kopecky, Jack Whisnant, David R. Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

To the Editor: Kopecky and his colleagues (Sept. 10 issue)1 contribute a careful study of lone atrial fibrillation, distinguished by its quasi-prospective design. However, the authors may wish to address a problem of definition. They refer to Evans and Swann's classic paper defining “lone” as “in the absence of any other clinical evidence to suggest a primary cardiac disorder.”2 The implications of “clinical” become crucial, because 21 of the patients in the series of Kopecky et al. had interventricular conduction delay, 10 had axis deviations, and 2 had bundle-branch blocks. Why were such electrocardiographic abnormalities not cause for exclusion? Had.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-640
Number of pages2
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume318
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 10 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Risks of Lone Atrial Fibrillation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Spodick, D. H., Petersen, P., Boysen, G., Bussey, H. I., Rospond, R. M., Quandt, C. M., Talbert, R. L., Gersh, B. J., McGoon, M. D., Kopecky, S. L., Whisnant, J., & Holmes, D. R. (1988). The Risks of Lone Atrial Fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 318(10), 639-640. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198803103181013