The reliability and validity of the MATRICS functional assessment battery

Dawn I Velligan, Megan Fredrick, Jim Mintz, Xueying Li, Maureen Rubin, Sanjay Dube, Smita N. Deshpande, Jitendra K. Trivedi, Shiv Gautam, Ajit Avasthi, Robert S. Kern, Stephen R. Marder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative was designed to encourage the development of cognitive enhancing agents for schizophrenia. For a medication to receive this indication, regulatory agencies require evidence of improvement in both cognition and functional outcome. Functional capacity measures typically used in clinical trials as intermediate measures of functional outcome must be adapted to fit different cultural contexts for use internationally. We examined the psychometric properties of the MATRICS Functional Assessment Battery (MFAB), comprised of 2 subtests from the UCSD Performancebased Skills Assessment (UPSA) and one from the Test of Adaptive Behavior in Schizophrenia (TABS) that were rated by experts in a previous study to be the most appropriate functional capacity assessments across different cultural contexts. Method: Four sites in India administered the MFAB, a brief version of the UPSA, the MATRICS Cognitive Consensus Battery, measures of symptomatology, and a measure of global functional outcome to 141 individuals with schizophrenia at a baseline assessment and at 4 weeks later. Results: Test-retest reliability based on the intraclass correlation coefficient was significantly better for the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment- Brief (UPSA-B). Pearson correlation coefficients over time were not significantly different for the 2 measures. Only the MFAB was significantly correlated with functional outcome as measured by the Specific Levels of Functioning Scale. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of the MFAB and UPSA-B were similar. The MATRICS scientific board chose to translate the MFAB into multiple languages for potential use in studies of novel medications seeking an indication for improving cognition in schizophrenia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1047-1052
Number of pages6
JournalSchizophrenia Bulletin
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Cognition
Schizophrenia
Research
Psychometrics
Psychological Adaptation
India
Consensus
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Co-primary measures
  • Cognitive impairments
  • Functional capacity measures
  • Intermediate measures
  • International clinical trials
  • Schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Velligan, D. I., Fredrick, M., Mintz, J., Li, X., Rubin, M., Dube, S., ... Marder, S. R. (2014). The reliability and validity of the MATRICS functional assessment battery. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(5), 1047-1052. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbt148

The reliability and validity of the MATRICS functional assessment battery. / Velligan, Dawn I; Fredrick, Megan; Mintz, Jim; Li, Xueying; Rubin, Maureen; Dube, Sanjay; Deshpande, Smita N.; Trivedi, Jitendra K.; Gautam, Shiv; Avasthi, Ajit; Kern, Robert S.; Marder, Stephen R.

In: Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2014, p. 1047-1052.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Velligan, DI, Fredrick, M, Mintz, J, Li, X, Rubin, M, Dube, S, Deshpande, SN, Trivedi, JK, Gautam, S, Avasthi, A, Kern, RS & Marder, SR 2014, 'The reliability and validity of the MATRICS functional assessment battery', Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1047-1052. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbt148
Velligan, Dawn I ; Fredrick, Megan ; Mintz, Jim ; Li, Xueying ; Rubin, Maureen ; Dube, Sanjay ; Deshpande, Smita N. ; Trivedi, Jitendra K. ; Gautam, Shiv ; Avasthi, Ajit ; Kern, Robert S. ; Marder, Stephen R. / The reliability and validity of the MATRICS functional assessment battery. In: Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2014 ; Vol. 40, No. 5. pp. 1047-1052.
@article{013df6a7acc54f62a093f0f11c35b1b4,
title = "The reliability and validity of the MATRICS functional assessment battery",
abstract = "Objectives: The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative was designed to encourage the development of cognitive enhancing agents for schizophrenia. For a medication to receive this indication, regulatory agencies require evidence of improvement in both cognition and functional outcome. Functional capacity measures typically used in clinical trials as intermediate measures of functional outcome must be adapted to fit different cultural contexts for use internationally. We examined the psychometric properties of the MATRICS Functional Assessment Battery (MFAB), comprised of 2 subtests from the UCSD Performancebased Skills Assessment (UPSA) and one from the Test of Adaptive Behavior in Schizophrenia (TABS) that were rated by experts in a previous study to be the most appropriate functional capacity assessments across different cultural contexts. Method: Four sites in India administered the MFAB, a brief version of the UPSA, the MATRICS Cognitive Consensus Battery, measures of symptomatology, and a measure of global functional outcome to 141 individuals with schizophrenia at a baseline assessment and at 4 weeks later. Results: Test-retest reliability based on the intraclass correlation coefficient was significantly better for the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment- Brief (UPSA-B). Pearson correlation coefficients over time were not significantly different for the 2 measures. Only the MFAB was significantly correlated with functional outcome as measured by the Specific Levels of Functioning Scale. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of the MFAB and UPSA-B were similar. The MATRICS scientific board chose to translate the MFAB into multiple languages for potential use in studies of novel medications seeking an indication for improving cognition in schizophrenia.",
keywords = "Co-primary measures, Cognitive impairments, Functional capacity measures, Intermediate measures, International clinical trials, Schizophrenia",
author = "Velligan, {Dawn I} and Megan Fredrick and Jim Mintz and Xueying Li and Maureen Rubin and Sanjay Dube and Deshpande, {Smita N.} and Trivedi, {Jitendra K.} and Shiv Gautam and Ajit Avasthi and Kern, {Robert S.} and Marder, {Stephen R.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1093/schbul/sbt148",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1047--1052",
journal = "Schizophrenia Bulletin",
issn = "0586-7614",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reliability and validity of the MATRICS functional assessment battery

AU - Velligan, Dawn I

AU - Fredrick, Megan

AU - Mintz, Jim

AU - Li, Xueying

AU - Rubin, Maureen

AU - Dube, Sanjay

AU - Deshpande, Smita N.

AU - Trivedi, Jitendra K.

AU - Gautam, Shiv

AU - Avasthi, Ajit

AU - Kern, Robert S.

AU - Marder, Stephen R.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative was designed to encourage the development of cognitive enhancing agents for schizophrenia. For a medication to receive this indication, regulatory agencies require evidence of improvement in both cognition and functional outcome. Functional capacity measures typically used in clinical trials as intermediate measures of functional outcome must be adapted to fit different cultural contexts for use internationally. We examined the psychometric properties of the MATRICS Functional Assessment Battery (MFAB), comprised of 2 subtests from the UCSD Performancebased Skills Assessment (UPSA) and one from the Test of Adaptive Behavior in Schizophrenia (TABS) that were rated by experts in a previous study to be the most appropriate functional capacity assessments across different cultural contexts. Method: Four sites in India administered the MFAB, a brief version of the UPSA, the MATRICS Cognitive Consensus Battery, measures of symptomatology, and a measure of global functional outcome to 141 individuals with schizophrenia at a baseline assessment and at 4 weeks later. Results: Test-retest reliability based on the intraclass correlation coefficient was significantly better for the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment- Brief (UPSA-B). Pearson correlation coefficients over time were not significantly different for the 2 measures. Only the MFAB was significantly correlated with functional outcome as measured by the Specific Levels of Functioning Scale. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of the MFAB and UPSA-B were similar. The MATRICS scientific board chose to translate the MFAB into multiple languages for potential use in studies of novel medications seeking an indication for improving cognition in schizophrenia.

AB - Objectives: The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative was designed to encourage the development of cognitive enhancing agents for schizophrenia. For a medication to receive this indication, regulatory agencies require evidence of improvement in both cognition and functional outcome. Functional capacity measures typically used in clinical trials as intermediate measures of functional outcome must be adapted to fit different cultural contexts for use internationally. We examined the psychometric properties of the MATRICS Functional Assessment Battery (MFAB), comprised of 2 subtests from the UCSD Performancebased Skills Assessment (UPSA) and one from the Test of Adaptive Behavior in Schizophrenia (TABS) that were rated by experts in a previous study to be the most appropriate functional capacity assessments across different cultural contexts. Method: Four sites in India administered the MFAB, a brief version of the UPSA, the MATRICS Cognitive Consensus Battery, measures of symptomatology, and a measure of global functional outcome to 141 individuals with schizophrenia at a baseline assessment and at 4 weeks later. Results: Test-retest reliability based on the intraclass correlation coefficient was significantly better for the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment- Brief (UPSA-B). Pearson correlation coefficients over time were not significantly different for the 2 measures. Only the MFAB was significantly correlated with functional outcome as measured by the Specific Levels of Functioning Scale. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of the MFAB and UPSA-B were similar. The MATRICS scientific board chose to translate the MFAB into multiple languages for potential use in studies of novel medications seeking an indication for improving cognition in schizophrenia.

KW - Co-primary measures

KW - Cognitive impairments

KW - Functional capacity measures

KW - Intermediate measures

KW - International clinical trials

KW - Schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907354903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907354903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/schbul/sbt148

DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbt148

M3 - Article

C2 - 24214931

AN - SCOPUS:84907354903

VL - 40

SP - 1047

EP - 1052

JO - Schizophrenia Bulletin

JF - Schizophrenia Bulletin

SN - 0586-7614

IS - 5

ER -