The relative significance of thermal and metabolic demands on burn hypermetabolism

L. H. Aulick, E. H. Hander, D. W. Wilmore, A. D. Mason, Basil A Pruitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate the claim that burn hypermetabolism can be eliminated by making patients warm and comfortable, respiratory gas exchange was measured, using a canopy hood system, in 20 burn patients and five normal controls resting in a 30°C ambient environment. Metabolic rates of burn patients determined by the canopy hood system were comparable to previous values obtained using Douglas bag techniques. In another study, the effects of induced hyperthermia were evaluated in seven febrile, hypermetabolic burn patients. External heating elevated rectal temperatures from 38.6 ± 0.3 to 39.4 ± 0.2 (mean ± S.E.M., p<0.001) but did not significantly reduce metabolic rate (76.5 ± 3.7 kcal/m 2 x hr vs. 73.9 ± 3.5). When five normals and seven burn patients adjusted room temperature until they were comfortable, the 'preferred' environmental temperature selected by the burn patients was 31.5 ± 0.7°C, significantly warmer than the 28.6 ± 0.7°C selected by the controls. In this comfortable environment the sleeping, febrile burn patients remained hypermetabolic (63.9 ± 5.7) and the Q(10) effect of the hyperpyrexia accounted for only 20 to 30% of the hypermetabolism observed. These studies demonstrated that the hypermetabolic response to burn injury is not significantly reduced in comfortable patients resting or sleeping in a warm environment, and the increased oxygen consumption cannot be accounted for by elevated body temperature. This evidence does not support the contention that burn hypermetabolism is primarily the result of thermoregulatory drives. The increased heat production following injury is the consequence of an elevated metabolic state.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)559-566
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma
Volume19
Issue number8
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hot Temperature
Temperature
Fever
Patients' Rooms
Induced Hyperthermia
Thermogenesis
Wounds and Injuries
Body Temperature
Oxygen Consumption
Heating
Gases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Aulick, L. H., Hander, E. H., Wilmore, D. W., Mason, A. D., & Pruitt, B. A. (1979). The relative significance of thermal and metabolic demands on burn hypermetabolism. Journal of Trauma, 19(8), 559-566.

The relative significance of thermal and metabolic demands on burn hypermetabolism. / Aulick, L. H.; Hander, E. H.; Wilmore, D. W.; Mason, A. D.; Pruitt, Basil A.

In: Journal of Trauma, Vol. 19, No. 8, 1979, p. 559-566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aulick, LH, Hander, EH, Wilmore, DW, Mason, AD & Pruitt, BA 1979, 'The relative significance of thermal and metabolic demands on burn hypermetabolism', Journal of Trauma, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 559-566.
Aulick LH, Hander EH, Wilmore DW, Mason AD, Pruitt BA. The relative significance of thermal and metabolic demands on burn hypermetabolism. Journal of Trauma. 1979;19(8):559-566.
Aulick, L. H. ; Hander, E. H. ; Wilmore, D. W. ; Mason, A. D. ; Pruitt, Basil A. / The relative significance of thermal and metabolic demands on burn hypermetabolism. In: Journal of Trauma. 1979 ; Vol. 19, No. 8. pp. 559-566.
@article{dc6efc3d7edb48ed90d53c767444f42a,
title = "The relative significance of thermal and metabolic demands on burn hypermetabolism",
abstract = "To evaluate the claim that burn hypermetabolism can be eliminated by making patients warm and comfortable, respiratory gas exchange was measured, using a canopy hood system, in 20 burn patients and five normal controls resting in a 30°C ambient environment. Metabolic rates of burn patients determined by the canopy hood system were comparable to previous values obtained using Douglas bag techniques. In another study, the effects of induced hyperthermia were evaluated in seven febrile, hypermetabolic burn patients. External heating elevated rectal temperatures from 38.6 ± 0.3 to 39.4 ± 0.2 (mean ± S.E.M., p<0.001) but did not significantly reduce metabolic rate (76.5 ± 3.7 kcal/m 2 x hr vs. 73.9 ± 3.5). When five normals and seven burn patients adjusted room temperature until they were comfortable, the 'preferred' environmental temperature selected by the burn patients was 31.5 ± 0.7°C, significantly warmer than the 28.6 ± 0.7°C selected by the controls. In this comfortable environment the sleeping, febrile burn patients remained hypermetabolic (63.9 ± 5.7) and the Q(10) effect of the hyperpyrexia accounted for only 20 to 30{\%} of the hypermetabolism observed. These studies demonstrated that the hypermetabolic response to burn injury is not significantly reduced in comfortable patients resting or sleeping in a warm environment, and the increased oxygen consumption cannot be accounted for by elevated body temperature. This evidence does not support the contention that burn hypermetabolism is primarily the result of thermoregulatory drives. The increased heat production following injury is the consequence of an elevated metabolic state.",
author = "Aulick, {L. H.} and Hander, {E. H.} and Wilmore, {D. W.} and Mason, {A. D.} and Pruitt, {Basil A}",
year = "1979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "559--566",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relative significance of thermal and metabolic demands on burn hypermetabolism

AU - Aulick, L. H.

AU - Hander, E. H.

AU - Wilmore, D. W.

AU - Mason, A. D.

AU - Pruitt, Basil A

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - To evaluate the claim that burn hypermetabolism can be eliminated by making patients warm and comfortable, respiratory gas exchange was measured, using a canopy hood system, in 20 burn patients and five normal controls resting in a 30°C ambient environment. Metabolic rates of burn patients determined by the canopy hood system were comparable to previous values obtained using Douglas bag techniques. In another study, the effects of induced hyperthermia were evaluated in seven febrile, hypermetabolic burn patients. External heating elevated rectal temperatures from 38.6 ± 0.3 to 39.4 ± 0.2 (mean ± S.E.M., p<0.001) but did not significantly reduce metabolic rate (76.5 ± 3.7 kcal/m 2 x hr vs. 73.9 ± 3.5). When five normals and seven burn patients adjusted room temperature until they were comfortable, the 'preferred' environmental temperature selected by the burn patients was 31.5 ± 0.7°C, significantly warmer than the 28.6 ± 0.7°C selected by the controls. In this comfortable environment the sleeping, febrile burn patients remained hypermetabolic (63.9 ± 5.7) and the Q(10) effect of the hyperpyrexia accounted for only 20 to 30% of the hypermetabolism observed. These studies demonstrated that the hypermetabolic response to burn injury is not significantly reduced in comfortable patients resting or sleeping in a warm environment, and the increased oxygen consumption cannot be accounted for by elevated body temperature. This evidence does not support the contention that burn hypermetabolism is primarily the result of thermoregulatory drives. The increased heat production following injury is the consequence of an elevated metabolic state.

AB - To evaluate the claim that burn hypermetabolism can be eliminated by making patients warm and comfortable, respiratory gas exchange was measured, using a canopy hood system, in 20 burn patients and five normal controls resting in a 30°C ambient environment. Metabolic rates of burn patients determined by the canopy hood system were comparable to previous values obtained using Douglas bag techniques. In another study, the effects of induced hyperthermia were evaluated in seven febrile, hypermetabolic burn patients. External heating elevated rectal temperatures from 38.6 ± 0.3 to 39.4 ± 0.2 (mean ± S.E.M., p<0.001) but did not significantly reduce metabolic rate (76.5 ± 3.7 kcal/m 2 x hr vs. 73.9 ± 3.5). When five normals and seven burn patients adjusted room temperature until they were comfortable, the 'preferred' environmental temperature selected by the burn patients was 31.5 ± 0.7°C, significantly warmer than the 28.6 ± 0.7°C selected by the controls. In this comfortable environment the sleeping, febrile burn patients remained hypermetabolic (63.9 ± 5.7) and the Q(10) effect of the hyperpyrexia accounted for only 20 to 30% of the hypermetabolism observed. These studies demonstrated that the hypermetabolic response to burn injury is not significantly reduced in comfortable patients resting or sleeping in a warm environment, and the increased oxygen consumption cannot be accounted for by elevated body temperature. This evidence does not support the contention that burn hypermetabolism is primarily the result of thermoregulatory drives. The increased heat production following injury is the consequence of an elevated metabolic state.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018648148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018648148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 469968

AN - SCOPUS:0018648148

VL - 19

SP - 559

EP - 566

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 8

ER -