The PTSD Criterion A debate: A brief history, current status, and recommendations for moving forward

Brian P. Marx, Brittany Hall-Clark, Matthew J. Friedman, Paul Holtzheimer, Paula P. Schnurr

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Criterion A, also known as the “stressor criterion,” has been a major source of debate ever since PTSD was added to the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM) in 1980. Since then, the traumatic stress field has held an ongoing debate about how to best define Criterion A and the events that it covers. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic and recent race-based incidents, the Criterion A debate has been reinvigorated. In this paper, we review briefly the history of Criterion A and changes in its language across different editions of the DSM. We then describe the four main positions held by scholars involved in the Criterion A debate and carefully examine the support for those positions. We conclude by offering recommendations for moving forward.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-15
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Traumatic Stress
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The PTSD Criterion A debate: A brief history, current status, and recommendations for moving forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this