Abstract
In 2001, Rivers and colleagues published a randomized controlled trial of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for the treatment of sepsis. More than a decade later, it remains a landmark achievement. The study proved the benefits of early aggressive treatment of sepsis. However, many questions remain about specific aspects of the complex EGDT algorithm. Recently, 3 large trials attempted to replicate these results. None of the studies demonstrated a benefit of an EGDT protocol for sepsis. This review explores the physiologic basis of goal-directed therapy, including the hemodynamic targets and the therapeutic interventions. An understanding of the physiologic basis of EGDT helps reconcile the results of the clinical trials.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 567-573 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Intensive Care Medicine |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- goal-directed therapy
- oxygen consumption
- oxygen delivery
- sepsis
- venous oxygen saturation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine