The number of deformed joints as a surrogate measure of damage in rheumatoid arthritis

Carlos H. Orces, Inmaculada Del Rincon, Michael P. Abel, Agustin Escalante

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the reliability and validity of the number of deformed joints (NDJ) as a surrogate measure of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. We tested interrater reliability and validity in determining the NDJ as a surrogate for joint damage in consecutive patients with RA. We rated each of 48 joints as normal or abnormal in terms of alignment and range of motion, and expressed the results as the total number of deformed joints. We compared the NDJ with the severity of damage on a plain radiograph of the hands, scored using Sharp's technique, as the gold standard measure of joint damage. We also compared the correlation between the NDJ and radiographic joint damage, on the one hand, and disease duration, performance-based measures of physical function, and the self-reported level of disability. Results. The interrater reliability of the NDJ was excellent, with an intraclass correlation among four examiners of 0.94. To assess validity of the NDJ, we studied 273 RA patients from 5 clinical settings. Their average NDJ was 14 (range 0-43), and their average Sharp's score for joint space narrowing and erosions combined was 106 (range 4-309). The NDJ and the total Sharp's score were highly correlated (r = 0.83). Both measures were correlated to a similar degree with disease duration (r = 0.51 for each measure), grip strength (r = -0.49 for NDJ, and r = -0.51 for Sharp's score), walking velocity (r = -0.44 for NDJ, and r = -0.45 for Sharp's score), the timed button test (r = -0.62 for NDJ, and r = -0.57 for Sharp's score), and the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (r = 0.38 for NDJ, and r = 0.38 for Sharp's score). Both the Sharp's score and the NDJ worsened significantly in 38 patients for whom 1-2 year followup data were available. Conclusion. The NDJ is reliable and is strongly associated with the standard measure of joint damage in RA. Because it is easily performed in a clinical setting, it could be used as an economical surrogate of joint damage in studies of the long-term outcome of RA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-72
Number of pages6
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Volume47
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Rheumatoid Arthritis
Joints
Reproducibility of Results
Hand Strength
Articular Range of Motion

Keywords

  • Joint counts
  • Joint damage
  • Joint deformity
  • Rheumatoid arthritis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Cite this

The number of deformed joints as a surrogate measure of damage in rheumatoid arthritis. / Orces, Carlos H.; Del Rincon, Inmaculada; Abel, Michael P.; Escalante, Agustin.

In: Arthritis Care and Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2002, p. 67-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{22dff15215084862b2bcb21e9c492ade,
title = "The number of deformed joints as a surrogate measure of damage in rheumatoid arthritis",
abstract = "Objective. To evaluate the reliability and validity of the number of deformed joints (NDJ) as a surrogate measure of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. We tested interrater reliability and validity in determining the NDJ as a surrogate for joint damage in consecutive patients with RA. We rated each of 48 joints as normal or abnormal in terms of alignment and range of motion, and expressed the results as the total number of deformed joints. We compared the NDJ with the severity of damage on a plain radiograph of the hands, scored using Sharp's technique, as the gold standard measure of joint damage. We also compared the correlation between the NDJ and radiographic joint damage, on the one hand, and disease duration, performance-based measures of physical function, and the self-reported level of disability. Results. The interrater reliability of the NDJ was excellent, with an intraclass correlation among four examiners of 0.94. To assess validity of the NDJ, we studied 273 RA patients from 5 clinical settings. Their average NDJ was 14 (range 0-43), and their average Sharp's score for joint space narrowing and erosions combined was 106 (range 4-309). The NDJ and the total Sharp's score were highly correlated (r = 0.83). Both measures were correlated to a similar degree with disease duration (r = 0.51 for each measure), grip strength (r = -0.49 for NDJ, and r = -0.51 for Sharp's score), walking velocity (r = -0.44 for NDJ, and r = -0.45 for Sharp's score), the timed button test (r = -0.62 for NDJ, and r = -0.57 for Sharp's score), and the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (r = 0.38 for NDJ, and r = 0.38 for Sharp's score). Both the Sharp's score and the NDJ worsened significantly in 38 patients for whom 1-2 year followup data were available. Conclusion. The NDJ is reliable and is strongly associated with the standard measure of joint damage in RA. Because it is easily performed in a clinical setting, it could be used as an economical surrogate of joint damage in studies of the long-term outcome of RA.",
keywords = "Joint counts, Joint damage, Joint deformity, Rheumatoid arthritis",
author = "Orces, {Carlos H.} and {Del Rincon}, Inmaculada and Abel, {Michael P.} and Agustin Escalante",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "67--72",
journal = "Arthritis and Rheumatology",
issn = "2326-5191",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The number of deformed joints as a surrogate measure of damage in rheumatoid arthritis

AU - Orces, Carlos H.

AU - Del Rincon, Inmaculada

AU - Abel, Michael P.

AU - Escalante, Agustin

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objective. To evaluate the reliability and validity of the number of deformed joints (NDJ) as a surrogate measure of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. We tested interrater reliability and validity in determining the NDJ as a surrogate for joint damage in consecutive patients with RA. We rated each of 48 joints as normal or abnormal in terms of alignment and range of motion, and expressed the results as the total number of deformed joints. We compared the NDJ with the severity of damage on a plain radiograph of the hands, scored using Sharp's technique, as the gold standard measure of joint damage. We also compared the correlation between the NDJ and radiographic joint damage, on the one hand, and disease duration, performance-based measures of physical function, and the self-reported level of disability. Results. The interrater reliability of the NDJ was excellent, with an intraclass correlation among four examiners of 0.94. To assess validity of the NDJ, we studied 273 RA patients from 5 clinical settings. Their average NDJ was 14 (range 0-43), and their average Sharp's score for joint space narrowing and erosions combined was 106 (range 4-309). The NDJ and the total Sharp's score were highly correlated (r = 0.83). Both measures were correlated to a similar degree with disease duration (r = 0.51 for each measure), grip strength (r = -0.49 for NDJ, and r = -0.51 for Sharp's score), walking velocity (r = -0.44 for NDJ, and r = -0.45 for Sharp's score), the timed button test (r = -0.62 for NDJ, and r = -0.57 for Sharp's score), and the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (r = 0.38 for NDJ, and r = 0.38 for Sharp's score). Both the Sharp's score and the NDJ worsened significantly in 38 patients for whom 1-2 year followup data were available. Conclusion. The NDJ is reliable and is strongly associated with the standard measure of joint damage in RA. Because it is easily performed in a clinical setting, it could be used as an economical surrogate of joint damage in studies of the long-term outcome of RA.

AB - Objective. To evaluate the reliability and validity of the number of deformed joints (NDJ) as a surrogate measure of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. We tested interrater reliability and validity in determining the NDJ as a surrogate for joint damage in consecutive patients with RA. We rated each of 48 joints as normal or abnormal in terms of alignment and range of motion, and expressed the results as the total number of deformed joints. We compared the NDJ with the severity of damage on a plain radiograph of the hands, scored using Sharp's technique, as the gold standard measure of joint damage. We also compared the correlation between the NDJ and radiographic joint damage, on the one hand, and disease duration, performance-based measures of physical function, and the self-reported level of disability. Results. The interrater reliability of the NDJ was excellent, with an intraclass correlation among four examiners of 0.94. To assess validity of the NDJ, we studied 273 RA patients from 5 clinical settings. Their average NDJ was 14 (range 0-43), and their average Sharp's score for joint space narrowing and erosions combined was 106 (range 4-309). The NDJ and the total Sharp's score were highly correlated (r = 0.83). Both measures were correlated to a similar degree with disease duration (r = 0.51 for each measure), grip strength (r = -0.49 for NDJ, and r = -0.51 for Sharp's score), walking velocity (r = -0.44 for NDJ, and r = -0.45 for Sharp's score), the timed button test (r = -0.62 for NDJ, and r = -0.57 for Sharp's score), and the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (r = 0.38 for NDJ, and r = 0.38 for Sharp's score). Both the Sharp's score and the NDJ worsened significantly in 38 patients for whom 1-2 year followup data were available. Conclusion. The NDJ is reliable and is strongly associated with the standard measure of joint damage in RA. Because it is easily performed in a clinical setting, it could be used as an economical surrogate of joint damage in studies of the long-term outcome of RA.

KW - Joint counts

KW - Joint damage

KW - Joint deformity

KW - Rheumatoid arthritis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036167321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036167321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11932880

AN - SCOPUS:0036167321

VL - 47

SP - 67

EP - 72

JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology

JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology

SN - 2326-5191

IS - 1

ER -