Abstract
The ability of both the non-credible score of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT NC) and the recognition score of the RAVLT (RAVLTRecog)topredictcredible versusnon-credible neuropsychological test performance was examined.Credibleversus non-credible group membership was determined according to diagnostic criteria with consideration of performance on two stand-alone performance validity tests. Findings from this retrospective data analysis of outpatients seen for neuropsychological testing within a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (N = 175) showed that RAVLT Recog demonstrated better classification accuracy than RAVLTNC in predicting credible versus non-credible neuropsychological test performance. Specifically, an RAVLT Recog cutoff of =9 resulted in reasonable sensitivity (48%) and acceptable specificity (91%) in predicting non-credible neuropsychological test performance. Implications for clinical practice are discussed. Note: The views contained here within are those of the authors and not representative of the institutions with which they are associated.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 130-138 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Malingering
- Memory
- Military veterans
- Neuropsychology
- Test validity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health