TY - JOUR
T1 - The infected diabetic foot
T2 - Risk factors for re-infection after treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis
AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.
AU - Reyes, Mario C.
AU - Najafi, Bijan
AU - Coye, Tyler L.
AU - Sideman, Matthew
AU - Siah, Michael C.
AU - Tarricone, Arthur N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wound Healing Society.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Our objective was to evaluate risk factors for re-infection in patients after treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (OM). We used pooled patient level data from two RTCs that evaluated patients with diabetic foot infections. We evaluated 171 patients with OM. OM was confirmed with bone culture or histopathology. Data from the 12-month follow-up were used to determine clinical outcomes. Re-infection occurred in 47 (27.5%) patients. Risk factors for re-infection were Toe Brachial Index <0.40 (25.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.02), skin perfusion pressure <40 mmHg (6.3% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.04), wound healing (55.3% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.01), time to heal (156.0, 69.5–365 vs. 91.5, 38.8–365, p = 0.001), and history of MI (14.9% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.005). During 12-month follow-up, patients with re-infections were 198.8 times more likely to require a foot related hospitalisation (81.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.001), 10.4 times more likely have an all-cause hospitalisation (70.2% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.001) and 9.4 times more likely to need an amputation (36.2% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.001). Patients with re-infection had a significantly longer median length of hospitalisation (20.0, 13.5–34.5 vs. 14.0, 10.0–22.0, p = 0.003) and median length of antibiotic duration (55.0, 35.0–87.0 vs. 46.0, 22.8–68.0, p = 0.03). Patients with re-infection are less likely to heal and have more foot-related hospitalizations and amputations.
AB - Our objective was to evaluate risk factors for re-infection in patients after treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (OM). We used pooled patient level data from two RTCs that evaluated patients with diabetic foot infections. We evaluated 171 patients with OM. OM was confirmed with bone culture or histopathology. Data from the 12-month follow-up were used to determine clinical outcomes. Re-infection occurred in 47 (27.5%) patients. Risk factors for re-infection were Toe Brachial Index <0.40 (25.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.02), skin perfusion pressure <40 mmHg (6.3% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.04), wound healing (55.3% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.01), time to heal (156.0, 69.5–365 vs. 91.5, 38.8–365, p = 0.001), and history of MI (14.9% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.005). During 12-month follow-up, patients with re-infections were 198.8 times more likely to require a foot related hospitalisation (81.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.001), 10.4 times more likely have an all-cause hospitalisation (70.2% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.001) and 9.4 times more likely to need an amputation (36.2% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.001). Patients with re-infection had a significantly longer median length of hospitalisation (20.0, 13.5–34.5 vs. 14.0, 10.0–22.0, p = 0.003) and median length of antibiotic duration (55.0, 35.0–87.0 vs. 46.0, 22.8–68.0, p = 0.03). Patients with re-infection are less likely to heal and have more foot-related hospitalizations and amputations.
KW - amputation
KW - diabetes
KW - infection
KW - osteomyelitis
KW - ulcer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215656018
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215656018#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1111/wrr.13246
DO - 10.1111/wrr.13246
M3 - Article
C2 - 39835482
AN - SCOPUS:85215656018
SN - 1067-1927
VL - 33
JO - Wound Repair and Regeneration
JF - Wound Repair and Regeneration
IS - 1
M1 - e13246
ER -