The general surgery workforce shortage is worse when assessed at county level

Ronald M Stewart, Lillian Liao, Molly West, Kenneth R Sirinek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Multiple studies have documented a significant decrease in the general surgery workforce in the United States, both rural and urban, for the past 3 decades. This 11-year study evaluates the Texas general surgery workforce at both the state and local level in 2002 and 2012. Methods Data were obtained from the Texas Medical Board, the United States Census Bureau/Texas State Library and Archives Commission, and the Texas Department of State Health Services for 2002 and 2012. A benchmark target of 7 general surgeons per 100,000 population was used. Results During the study period, the Texas population increased 21%, and actively practicing physicians increased 44%. All surgical specialists increased by 26%. General surgeons increased 4%; however, the number of general surgeons per 100,000 population decreased 14% (from 6.7 to 5.8/105). Using the total Texas population for 2012, an additional 329 general surgeons are needed by benchmark standards. However, when analyzed by individual county population, 449 additional general surgeons are needed in the individual counties. These effects were greater in the nonmetropolitan areas of Texas where per capita general surgeons decreased by 21%. Conclusions The absolute increase in Texas general surgeons over the past decade has not kept pace with an increase in the Texas population. The general surgery workforce deficit based on the Texas state population underestimates the local workforce shortage, particularly in the nonmetropolitan areas of Texas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1016-1023
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume206
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Population
Benchmarking
Censuses
Surgeons
Libraries
Health Services
Physicians

Keywords

  • General surgery
  • Physician recruitment and retention
  • Rural
  • Surgery
  • Texas
  • Workforce

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The general surgery workforce shortage is worse when assessed at county level. / Stewart, Ronald M; Liao, Lillian; West, Molly; Sirinek, Kenneth R.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 206, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 1016-1023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c247ff771e6546408c8ab7eddb93339c,
title = "The general surgery workforce shortage is worse when assessed at county level",
abstract = "Background Multiple studies have documented a significant decrease in the general surgery workforce in the United States, both rural and urban, for the past 3 decades. This 11-year study evaluates the Texas general surgery workforce at both the state and local level in 2002 and 2012. Methods Data were obtained from the Texas Medical Board, the United States Census Bureau/Texas State Library and Archives Commission, and the Texas Department of State Health Services for 2002 and 2012. A benchmark target of 7 general surgeons per 100,000 population was used. Results During the study period, the Texas population increased 21{\%}, and actively practicing physicians increased 44{\%}. All surgical specialists increased by 26{\%}. General surgeons increased 4{\%}; however, the number of general surgeons per 100,000 population decreased 14{\%} (from 6.7 to 5.8/105). Using the total Texas population for 2012, an additional 329 general surgeons are needed by benchmark standards. However, when analyzed by individual county population, 449 additional general surgeons are needed in the individual counties. These effects were greater in the nonmetropolitan areas of Texas where per capita general surgeons decreased by 21{\%}. Conclusions The absolute increase in Texas general surgeons over the past decade has not kept pace with an increase in the Texas population. The general surgery workforce deficit based on the Texas state population underestimates the local workforce shortage, particularly in the nonmetropolitan areas of Texas.",
keywords = "General surgery, Physician recruitment and retention, Rural, Surgery, Texas, Workforce",
author = "Stewart, {Ronald M} and Lillian Liao and Molly West and Sirinek, {Kenneth R}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "206",
pages = "1016--1023",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The general surgery workforce shortage is worse when assessed at county level

AU - Stewart, Ronald M

AU - Liao, Lillian

AU - West, Molly

AU - Sirinek, Kenneth R

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Background Multiple studies have documented a significant decrease in the general surgery workforce in the United States, both rural and urban, for the past 3 decades. This 11-year study evaluates the Texas general surgery workforce at both the state and local level in 2002 and 2012. Methods Data were obtained from the Texas Medical Board, the United States Census Bureau/Texas State Library and Archives Commission, and the Texas Department of State Health Services for 2002 and 2012. A benchmark target of 7 general surgeons per 100,000 population was used. Results During the study period, the Texas population increased 21%, and actively practicing physicians increased 44%. All surgical specialists increased by 26%. General surgeons increased 4%; however, the number of general surgeons per 100,000 population decreased 14% (from 6.7 to 5.8/105). Using the total Texas population for 2012, an additional 329 general surgeons are needed by benchmark standards. However, when analyzed by individual county population, 449 additional general surgeons are needed in the individual counties. These effects were greater in the nonmetropolitan areas of Texas where per capita general surgeons decreased by 21%. Conclusions The absolute increase in Texas general surgeons over the past decade has not kept pace with an increase in the Texas population. The general surgery workforce deficit based on the Texas state population underestimates the local workforce shortage, particularly in the nonmetropolitan areas of Texas.

AB - Background Multiple studies have documented a significant decrease in the general surgery workforce in the United States, both rural and urban, for the past 3 decades. This 11-year study evaluates the Texas general surgery workforce at both the state and local level in 2002 and 2012. Methods Data were obtained from the Texas Medical Board, the United States Census Bureau/Texas State Library and Archives Commission, and the Texas Department of State Health Services for 2002 and 2012. A benchmark target of 7 general surgeons per 100,000 population was used. Results During the study period, the Texas population increased 21%, and actively practicing physicians increased 44%. All surgical specialists increased by 26%. General surgeons increased 4%; however, the number of general surgeons per 100,000 population decreased 14% (from 6.7 to 5.8/105). Using the total Texas population for 2012, an additional 329 general surgeons are needed by benchmark standards. However, when analyzed by individual county population, 449 additional general surgeons are needed in the individual counties. These effects were greater in the nonmetropolitan areas of Texas where per capita general surgeons decreased by 21%. Conclusions The absolute increase in Texas general surgeons over the past decade has not kept pace with an increase in the Texas population. The general surgery workforce deficit based on the Texas state population underestimates the local workforce shortage, particularly in the nonmetropolitan areas of Texas.

KW - General surgery

KW - Physician recruitment and retention

KW - Rural

KW - Surgery

KW - Texas

KW - Workforce

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889099778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889099778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.018

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 24124658

AN - SCOPUS:84889099778

VL - 206

SP - 1016

EP - 1023

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 6

ER -