The framingham heart study clock drawing performance: Normative data from the offspring Cohort

Justin A. Nyborn, Jayandra J. Himali, Alexa S. Beiser, Sherral A. Devine, Yangchun Du, Edith Kaplan, Maureen K. O'Connor, William E. Rinn, Helen S. Denison, Sudha Seshadri, Philip A. Wolf, Rhoda Au

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Study Context: Although the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a popular tool used to assess cognitive function, limited normative data on CDT performance exist. The objective of the current study was to provide normative data on an expanded version of previous CDT scoring protocols from a large community-based sample of middle to older adults (aged 43 to 91) from the Framingham Heart Study. Methods: The CDT was administered to 1476 Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort participants using a scoring protocol that assigned error scores to drawn features. Total error scores were computed, as well as for subscales pertaining to outline, numeral placement, time-setting, center, and "other." Results: Higher levels of education were significantly associated with fewer errors for time-setting (Command: p <.001; Copy: p =.003), numerals (Command: p <.001), and "other" (Command: p <.001) subscales. Older age was significantly associated with more errors for time-setting (Command: p <.001; Copy: p =.003), numerals (Command: p <.001), and "other" (Command: p <.001) subscales. Significant differences were also found between education groups on the Command condition for all but the oldest age group (75+). Conclusion: Results provide normative data on CDT performance within a community-based cohort. Errors appear to be more prevalent in older compared with younger individuals, and may be less prevalent in individuals who completed at least some college compared with those who did not. Future studies are needed to determine whether this expanded scoring system allows detection of preclinical symptoms of future risk for dementia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-108
Number of pages29
JournalExperimental Aging Research
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Education
Cognition
Dementia
Cohort Studies
Age Groups
Clock
Cohort
Offspring
Scoring
Numerals
Performance Test
Cognitive Function
Level of Education
Placement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Nyborn, J. A., Himali, J. J., Beiser, A. S., Devine, S. A., Du, Y., Kaplan, E., ... Au, R. (2013). The framingham heart study clock drawing performance: Normative data from the offspring Cohort. Experimental Aging Research, 39(1), 80-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2013.741996

The framingham heart study clock drawing performance : Normative data from the offspring Cohort. / Nyborn, Justin A.; Himali, Jayandra J.; Beiser, Alexa S.; Devine, Sherral A.; Du, Yangchun; Kaplan, Edith; O'Connor, Maureen K.; Rinn, William E.; Denison, Helen S.; Seshadri, Sudha; Wolf, Philip A.; Au, Rhoda.

In: Experimental Aging Research, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 80-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nyborn, JA, Himali, JJ, Beiser, AS, Devine, SA, Du, Y, Kaplan, E, O'Connor, MK, Rinn, WE, Denison, HS, Seshadri, S, Wolf, PA & Au, R 2013, 'The framingham heart study clock drawing performance: Normative data from the offspring Cohort', Experimental Aging Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 80-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2013.741996
Nyborn, Justin A. ; Himali, Jayandra J. ; Beiser, Alexa S. ; Devine, Sherral A. ; Du, Yangchun ; Kaplan, Edith ; O'Connor, Maureen K. ; Rinn, William E. ; Denison, Helen S. ; Seshadri, Sudha ; Wolf, Philip A. ; Au, Rhoda. / The framingham heart study clock drawing performance : Normative data from the offspring Cohort. In: Experimental Aging Research. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 80-108.
@article{1d07e6321e744e619eae7a65aadd921d,
title = "The framingham heart study clock drawing performance: Normative data from the offspring Cohort",
abstract = "Background/Study Context: Although the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a popular tool used to assess cognitive function, limited normative data on CDT performance exist. The objective of the current study was to provide normative data on an expanded version of previous CDT scoring protocols from a large community-based sample of middle to older adults (aged 43 to 91) from the Framingham Heart Study. Methods: The CDT was administered to 1476 Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort participants using a scoring protocol that assigned error scores to drawn features. Total error scores were computed, as well as for subscales pertaining to outline, numeral placement, time-setting, center, and {"}other.{"} Results: Higher levels of education were significantly associated with fewer errors for time-setting (Command: p <.001; Copy: p =.003), numerals (Command: p <.001), and {"}other{"} (Command: p <.001) subscales. Older age was significantly associated with more errors for time-setting (Command: p <.001; Copy: p =.003), numerals (Command: p <.001), and {"}other{"} (Command: p <.001) subscales. Significant differences were also found between education groups on the Command condition for all but the oldest age group (75+). Conclusion: Results provide normative data on CDT performance within a community-based cohort. Errors appear to be more prevalent in older compared with younger individuals, and may be less prevalent in individuals who completed at least some college compared with those who did not. Future studies are needed to determine whether this expanded scoring system allows detection of preclinical symptoms of future risk for dementia.",
author = "Nyborn, {Justin A.} and Himali, {Jayandra J.} and Beiser, {Alexa S.} and Devine, {Sherral A.} and Yangchun Du and Edith Kaplan and O'Connor, {Maureen K.} and Rinn, {William E.} and Denison, {Helen S.} and Sudha Seshadri and Wolf, {Philip A.} and Rhoda Au",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0361073X.2013.741996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "80--108",
journal = "Experimental Aging Research",
issn = "0361-073X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The framingham heart study clock drawing performance

T2 - Normative data from the offspring Cohort

AU - Nyborn, Justin A.

AU - Himali, Jayandra J.

AU - Beiser, Alexa S.

AU - Devine, Sherral A.

AU - Du, Yangchun

AU - Kaplan, Edith

AU - O'Connor, Maureen K.

AU - Rinn, William E.

AU - Denison, Helen S.

AU - Seshadri, Sudha

AU - Wolf, Philip A.

AU - Au, Rhoda

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Background/Study Context: Although the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a popular tool used to assess cognitive function, limited normative data on CDT performance exist. The objective of the current study was to provide normative data on an expanded version of previous CDT scoring protocols from a large community-based sample of middle to older adults (aged 43 to 91) from the Framingham Heart Study. Methods: The CDT was administered to 1476 Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort participants using a scoring protocol that assigned error scores to drawn features. Total error scores were computed, as well as for subscales pertaining to outline, numeral placement, time-setting, center, and "other." Results: Higher levels of education were significantly associated with fewer errors for time-setting (Command: p <.001; Copy: p =.003), numerals (Command: p <.001), and "other" (Command: p <.001) subscales. Older age was significantly associated with more errors for time-setting (Command: p <.001; Copy: p =.003), numerals (Command: p <.001), and "other" (Command: p <.001) subscales. Significant differences were also found between education groups on the Command condition for all but the oldest age group (75+). Conclusion: Results provide normative data on CDT performance within a community-based cohort. Errors appear to be more prevalent in older compared with younger individuals, and may be less prevalent in individuals who completed at least some college compared with those who did not. Future studies are needed to determine whether this expanded scoring system allows detection of preclinical symptoms of future risk for dementia.

AB - Background/Study Context: Although the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a popular tool used to assess cognitive function, limited normative data on CDT performance exist. The objective of the current study was to provide normative data on an expanded version of previous CDT scoring protocols from a large community-based sample of middle to older adults (aged 43 to 91) from the Framingham Heart Study. Methods: The CDT was administered to 1476 Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort participants using a scoring protocol that assigned error scores to drawn features. Total error scores were computed, as well as for subscales pertaining to outline, numeral placement, time-setting, center, and "other." Results: Higher levels of education were significantly associated with fewer errors for time-setting (Command: p <.001; Copy: p =.003), numerals (Command: p <.001), and "other" (Command: p <.001) subscales. Older age was significantly associated with more errors for time-setting (Command: p <.001; Copy: p =.003), numerals (Command: p <.001), and "other" (Command: p <.001) subscales. Significant differences were also found between education groups on the Command condition for all but the oldest age group (75+). Conclusion: Results provide normative data on CDT performance within a community-based cohort. Errors appear to be more prevalent in older compared with younger individuals, and may be less prevalent in individuals who completed at least some college compared with those who did not. Future studies are needed to determine whether this expanded scoring system allows detection of preclinical symptoms of future risk for dementia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872857485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872857485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0361073X.2013.741996

DO - 10.1080/0361073X.2013.741996

M3 - Article

C2 - 23316738

AN - SCOPUS:84872857485

VL - 39

SP - 80

EP - 108

JO - Experimental Aging Research

JF - Experimental Aging Research

SN - 0361-073X

IS - 1

ER -