The endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum: CO2 laser versus endoscopic stapling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to analyze the endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum (ZD) using both the CO2 laser and endoscopic stapling techniques. This study compares the two techniques in terms of diverticulum size, onset to oral intake, hospital stay, resolution of symptoms (dysphagia and regurgitation), and complications. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective consecutive case series was performed at an academic medical center. METHODS: Forty patients underwent an attempted endoscopic resection of the ZD using either the CO2 laser or the endoscopic stapling technique. The two techniques were compared on a variety of parameters, including diverticulum size, hospital stay, onset to oral intake, resolution of symptoms, and complications. Symptom scores were obtained before and after surgery with a patient self-reported scoring report (scale 0-3 for both dysphagia and regurgitation with 0 indicating asymptomatic and 3 severe symptoms). RESULTS: Forty patients underwent an attempted endoscopic management of ZD. Five patients (12.5%) failed endoscopic exposure (four converted to open, one observed). Sixteen patients underwent CO2 laser management and 19 underwent endoscopic stapling. The mean diverticulum size (3.8 cm CO 2 laser versus 4.4 cm stapling) was not significantly different for the two groups. Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in preoperative versus postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation symptoms scores, respectively, CO2 laser dysphagia scores decreasing from 2.75 to 1.38 and the regurgitation score dropping from 1.51 to 0.68, whereas endoscopic stapling dysphagia score decreased from 2.74 to 1.21 and the regurgitation score dropped from 1.37 to 0.53. Overall, 86% of patients demonstrated an onset of liquid intake on postoperative day 1 and the average length of stay was 3.4 days in the CO2 laser group and 1.5 days in the endoscopic stapling (P < .0015). Complications included dental trauma in four patients (two CO 2 laser and two stapling) and subcutaneous air in three patients (all three CO2 laser). There were no cases of mediastinitis, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, fistula, or perioperative death. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic management of ZD is a safe and effective technique. The endoscopic stapling technique appears to have an improved efficacy and safety when compared with the CO2 laser technique. The two techniques are compared and contrasted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1608-1611
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume116
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2006

Fingerprint

Zenker Diverticulum
Gas Lasers
Deglutition Disorders
Diverticulum
Length of Stay
Carbon Monoxide
Lasers
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries
Mediastinitis
Fistula
Tooth
Air
Safety

Keywords

  • Diverticulostomy
  • Dysphagia
  • Endoscopy
  • Esophageal diverticulum
  • Pharynx
  • Zenker's diverticulum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum : CO2 laser versus endoscopic stapling. / Miller, Frank R; Bartley, Jess; Otto, Randal A.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 116, No. 9, 09.2006, p. 1608-1611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{defbb3db1cb94d6dba5dd01a24b18e1f,
title = "The endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum: CO2 laser versus endoscopic stapling",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to analyze the endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum (ZD) using both the CO2 laser and endoscopic stapling techniques. This study compares the two techniques in terms of diverticulum size, onset to oral intake, hospital stay, resolution of symptoms (dysphagia and regurgitation), and complications. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective consecutive case series was performed at an academic medical center. METHODS: Forty patients underwent an attempted endoscopic resection of the ZD using either the CO2 laser or the endoscopic stapling technique. The two techniques were compared on a variety of parameters, including diverticulum size, hospital stay, onset to oral intake, resolution of symptoms, and complications. Symptom scores were obtained before and after surgery with a patient self-reported scoring report (scale 0-3 for both dysphagia and regurgitation with 0 indicating asymptomatic and 3 severe symptoms). RESULTS: Forty patients underwent an attempted endoscopic management of ZD. Five patients (12.5{\%}) failed endoscopic exposure (four converted to open, one observed). Sixteen patients underwent CO2 laser management and 19 underwent endoscopic stapling. The mean diverticulum size (3.8 cm CO 2 laser versus 4.4 cm stapling) was not significantly different for the two groups. Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in preoperative versus postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation symptoms scores, respectively, CO2 laser dysphagia scores decreasing from 2.75 to 1.38 and the regurgitation score dropping from 1.51 to 0.68, whereas endoscopic stapling dysphagia score decreased from 2.74 to 1.21 and the regurgitation score dropped from 1.37 to 0.53. Overall, 86{\%} of patients demonstrated an onset of liquid intake on postoperative day 1 and the average length of stay was 3.4 days in the CO2 laser group and 1.5 days in the endoscopic stapling (P < .0015). Complications included dental trauma in four patients (two CO 2 laser and two stapling) and subcutaneous air in three patients (all three CO2 laser). There were no cases of mediastinitis, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, fistula, or perioperative death. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic management of ZD is a safe and effective technique. The endoscopic stapling technique appears to have an improved efficacy and safety when compared with the CO2 laser technique. The two techniques are compared and contrasted.",
keywords = "Diverticulostomy, Dysphagia, Endoscopy, Esophageal diverticulum, Pharynx, Zenker's diverticulum",
author = "Miller, {Frank R} and Jess Bartley and Otto, {Randal A}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/01.mlg.0000233508.06499.41",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "1608--1611",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum

T2 - CO2 laser versus endoscopic stapling

AU - Miller, Frank R

AU - Bartley, Jess

AU - Otto, Randal A

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to analyze the endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum (ZD) using both the CO2 laser and endoscopic stapling techniques. This study compares the two techniques in terms of diverticulum size, onset to oral intake, hospital stay, resolution of symptoms (dysphagia and regurgitation), and complications. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective consecutive case series was performed at an academic medical center. METHODS: Forty patients underwent an attempted endoscopic resection of the ZD using either the CO2 laser or the endoscopic stapling technique. The two techniques were compared on a variety of parameters, including diverticulum size, hospital stay, onset to oral intake, resolution of symptoms, and complications. Symptom scores were obtained before and after surgery with a patient self-reported scoring report (scale 0-3 for both dysphagia and regurgitation with 0 indicating asymptomatic and 3 severe symptoms). RESULTS: Forty patients underwent an attempted endoscopic management of ZD. Five patients (12.5%) failed endoscopic exposure (four converted to open, one observed). Sixteen patients underwent CO2 laser management and 19 underwent endoscopic stapling. The mean diverticulum size (3.8 cm CO 2 laser versus 4.4 cm stapling) was not significantly different for the two groups. Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in preoperative versus postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation symptoms scores, respectively, CO2 laser dysphagia scores decreasing from 2.75 to 1.38 and the regurgitation score dropping from 1.51 to 0.68, whereas endoscopic stapling dysphagia score decreased from 2.74 to 1.21 and the regurgitation score dropped from 1.37 to 0.53. Overall, 86% of patients demonstrated an onset of liquid intake on postoperative day 1 and the average length of stay was 3.4 days in the CO2 laser group and 1.5 days in the endoscopic stapling (P < .0015). Complications included dental trauma in four patients (two CO 2 laser and two stapling) and subcutaneous air in three patients (all three CO2 laser). There were no cases of mediastinitis, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, fistula, or perioperative death. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic management of ZD is a safe and effective technique. The endoscopic stapling technique appears to have an improved efficacy and safety when compared with the CO2 laser technique. The two techniques are compared and contrasted.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to analyze the endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum (ZD) using both the CO2 laser and endoscopic stapling techniques. This study compares the two techniques in terms of diverticulum size, onset to oral intake, hospital stay, resolution of symptoms (dysphagia and regurgitation), and complications. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective consecutive case series was performed at an academic medical center. METHODS: Forty patients underwent an attempted endoscopic resection of the ZD using either the CO2 laser or the endoscopic stapling technique. The two techniques were compared on a variety of parameters, including diverticulum size, hospital stay, onset to oral intake, resolution of symptoms, and complications. Symptom scores were obtained before and after surgery with a patient self-reported scoring report (scale 0-3 for both dysphagia and regurgitation with 0 indicating asymptomatic and 3 severe symptoms). RESULTS: Forty patients underwent an attempted endoscopic management of ZD. Five patients (12.5%) failed endoscopic exposure (four converted to open, one observed). Sixteen patients underwent CO2 laser management and 19 underwent endoscopic stapling. The mean diverticulum size (3.8 cm CO 2 laser versus 4.4 cm stapling) was not significantly different for the two groups. Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in preoperative versus postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation symptoms scores, respectively, CO2 laser dysphagia scores decreasing from 2.75 to 1.38 and the regurgitation score dropping from 1.51 to 0.68, whereas endoscopic stapling dysphagia score decreased from 2.74 to 1.21 and the regurgitation score dropped from 1.37 to 0.53. Overall, 86% of patients demonstrated an onset of liquid intake on postoperative day 1 and the average length of stay was 3.4 days in the CO2 laser group and 1.5 days in the endoscopic stapling (P < .0015). Complications included dental trauma in four patients (two CO 2 laser and two stapling) and subcutaneous air in three patients (all three CO2 laser). There were no cases of mediastinitis, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, fistula, or perioperative death. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic management of ZD is a safe and effective technique. The endoscopic stapling technique appears to have an improved efficacy and safety when compared with the CO2 laser technique. The two techniques are compared and contrasted.

KW - Diverticulostomy

KW - Dysphagia

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Esophageal diverticulum

KW - Pharynx

KW - Zenker's diverticulum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748560485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748560485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mlg.0000233508.06499.41

DO - 10.1097/01.mlg.0000233508.06499.41

M3 - Article

C2 - 16954989

AN - SCOPUS:33748560485

VL - 116

SP - 1608

EP - 1611

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 9

ER -