The effect of sterile inflammation on skin flap survival

R. N. Gaughan, Randal A Otto, G. J. Renner, J. W. Templer, W. E. Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several investigations have suggested that a sterile inflammatory reaction in a skin flap enhances flap survival. A chemical peel produces a mild chemical burn, which is one form of nonbacterial inflammatory response. Some authors advocate the concomitant use of face lift and chemical peel, while others caution that the peel might jeopardize the facial flaps. To determine whether the reaction caused by a chemical peel enhances or impairs skin flap survival, a study using miniature pigs was undertaken. Survival length of flaps treated with a chemical peel was compared to that of untreated flaps. A total of 36 dorsally based random flaps were used on three miniature pigs. Six identical 14 x 4 cm flaps were designed on each side of the pigs. A chemical peel was applied to the area of 18 of the proposed flaps 2 days prior to elevation. Alternate flaps on each side of the pigs were treated. As the flaps were elevated, the tips were examined to document the inflammatory response histologically. After 14 days, the surviving length of the flaps was measured. As determined by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, there was no significant difference between the treated and untreated groups. Our study shows that a nonbacterial inflammatory response produced by a chemical peel does not improve skin flap survival, at least not in pigs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)90-93
Number of pages4
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume95
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Swine
Inflammation
Skin
Chemical Burns
Rhytidoplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Gaughan, R. N., Otto, R. A., Renner, G. J., Templer, J. W., & Davis, W. E. (1986). The effect of sterile inflammation on skin flap survival. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 95(1), 90-93.

The effect of sterile inflammation on skin flap survival. / Gaughan, R. N.; Otto, Randal A; Renner, G. J.; Templer, J. W.; Davis, W. E.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 95, No. 1, 1986, p. 90-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gaughan, RN, Otto, RA, Renner, GJ, Templer, JW & Davis, WE 1986, 'The effect of sterile inflammation on skin flap survival', Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 90-93.
Gaughan, R. N. ; Otto, Randal A ; Renner, G. J. ; Templer, J. W. ; Davis, W. E. / The effect of sterile inflammation on skin flap survival. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 1986 ; Vol. 95, No. 1. pp. 90-93.
@article{eec58eab0e2e4b1281a7e76dcff9b29a,
title = "The effect of sterile inflammation on skin flap survival",
abstract = "Several investigations have suggested that a sterile inflammatory reaction in a skin flap enhances flap survival. A chemical peel produces a mild chemical burn, which is one form of nonbacterial inflammatory response. Some authors advocate the concomitant use of face lift and chemical peel, while others caution that the peel might jeopardize the facial flaps. To determine whether the reaction caused by a chemical peel enhances or impairs skin flap survival, a study using miniature pigs was undertaken. Survival length of flaps treated with a chemical peel was compared to that of untreated flaps. A total of 36 dorsally based random flaps were used on three miniature pigs. Six identical 14 x 4 cm flaps were designed on each side of the pigs. A chemical peel was applied to the area of 18 of the proposed flaps 2 days prior to elevation. Alternate flaps on each side of the pigs were treated. As the flaps were elevated, the tips were examined to document the inflammatory response histologically. After 14 days, the surviving length of the flaps was measured. As determined by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, there was no significant difference between the treated and untreated groups. Our study shows that a nonbacterial inflammatory response produced by a chemical peel does not improve skin flap survival, at least not in pigs.",
author = "Gaughan, {R. N.} and Otto, {Randal A} and Renner, {G. J.} and Templer, {J. W.} and Davis, {W. E.}",
year = "1986",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "90--93",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of sterile inflammation on skin flap survival

AU - Gaughan, R. N.

AU - Otto, Randal A

AU - Renner, G. J.

AU - Templer, J. W.

AU - Davis, W. E.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Several investigations have suggested that a sterile inflammatory reaction in a skin flap enhances flap survival. A chemical peel produces a mild chemical burn, which is one form of nonbacterial inflammatory response. Some authors advocate the concomitant use of face lift and chemical peel, while others caution that the peel might jeopardize the facial flaps. To determine whether the reaction caused by a chemical peel enhances or impairs skin flap survival, a study using miniature pigs was undertaken. Survival length of flaps treated with a chemical peel was compared to that of untreated flaps. A total of 36 dorsally based random flaps were used on three miniature pigs. Six identical 14 x 4 cm flaps were designed on each side of the pigs. A chemical peel was applied to the area of 18 of the proposed flaps 2 days prior to elevation. Alternate flaps on each side of the pigs were treated. As the flaps were elevated, the tips were examined to document the inflammatory response histologically. After 14 days, the surviving length of the flaps was measured. As determined by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, there was no significant difference between the treated and untreated groups. Our study shows that a nonbacterial inflammatory response produced by a chemical peel does not improve skin flap survival, at least not in pigs.

AB - Several investigations have suggested that a sterile inflammatory reaction in a skin flap enhances flap survival. A chemical peel produces a mild chemical burn, which is one form of nonbacterial inflammatory response. Some authors advocate the concomitant use of face lift and chemical peel, while others caution that the peel might jeopardize the facial flaps. To determine whether the reaction caused by a chemical peel enhances or impairs skin flap survival, a study using miniature pigs was undertaken. Survival length of flaps treated with a chemical peel was compared to that of untreated flaps. A total of 36 dorsally based random flaps were used on three miniature pigs. Six identical 14 x 4 cm flaps were designed on each side of the pigs. A chemical peel was applied to the area of 18 of the proposed flaps 2 days prior to elevation. Alternate flaps on each side of the pigs were treated. As the flaps were elevated, the tips were examined to document the inflammatory response histologically. After 14 days, the surviving length of the flaps was measured. As determined by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, there was no significant difference between the treated and untreated groups. Our study shows that a nonbacterial inflammatory response produced by a chemical peel does not improve skin flap survival, at least not in pigs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022541316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022541316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3106901

AN - SCOPUS:0022541316

VL - 95

SP - 90

EP - 93

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 1

ER -