The effect of framing incentives as either losses or gains with contingency management for smoking cessation

Paul Romanowich, Richard J Lamb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cumulative prospect theory predicts that losses motivate behavior more than equal gains. Contingency management procedures effectively reduce drug use by placing incentives in direct competition with the drug taking behavior. Therefore, framing incentives as losses, rather than gains should decrease drug use to a greater extent, given equivalent incentives. We examined whether contingent vouchers described as either losses or gains differentially affected smoking abstinence rates. Over 5 consecutive days, participants could either gain $75 per day for verified abstinence or lose $75 per day (initial endowment = $375) for continuing to smoke. As a result, loss-framed participants were more likely to achieve at least one day of abstinence. There was a trend towards loss-framed participants reducing the amount smoked more than gain-framed participants. However, participants in the gain-framed group were more likely to maintain abstinence, once initiated. The results partially support cumulative prospect theory and suggest additional ways to initiate behavior change using incentives, outside of using larger magnitude incentives in contingency management procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2084-2088
Number of pages5
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Smoking Cessation
Motivation
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Financial Management
Smoke
Smoking

Keywords

  • Cigarette smoking
  • Contingency management
  • Cumulative prospect theory
  • Smoking cessation
  • Verbal contingency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Toxicology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The effect of framing incentives as either losses or gains with contingency management for smoking cessation. / Romanowich, Paul; Lamb, Richard J.

In: Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 38, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 2084-2088.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e173fb6202945228ffdd419960f78fc,
title = "The effect of framing incentives as either losses or gains with contingency management for smoking cessation",
abstract = "Cumulative prospect theory predicts that losses motivate behavior more than equal gains. Contingency management procedures effectively reduce drug use by placing incentives in direct competition with the drug taking behavior. Therefore, framing incentives as losses, rather than gains should decrease drug use to a greater extent, given equivalent incentives. We examined whether contingent vouchers described as either losses or gains differentially affected smoking abstinence rates. Over 5 consecutive days, participants could either gain $75 per day for verified abstinence or lose $75 per day (initial endowment = $375) for continuing to smoke. As a result, loss-framed participants were more likely to achieve at least one day of abstinence. There was a trend towards loss-framed participants reducing the amount smoked more than gain-framed participants. However, participants in the gain-framed group were more likely to maintain abstinence, once initiated. The results partially support cumulative prospect theory and suggest additional ways to initiate behavior change using incentives, outside of using larger magnitude incentives in contingency management procedures.",
keywords = "Cigarette smoking, Contingency management, Cumulative prospect theory, Smoking cessation, Verbal contingency",
author = "Paul Romanowich and Lamb, {Richard J}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "2084--2088",
journal = "Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0306-4603",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of framing incentives as either losses or gains with contingency management for smoking cessation

AU - Romanowich, Paul

AU - Lamb, Richard J

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Cumulative prospect theory predicts that losses motivate behavior more than equal gains. Contingency management procedures effectively reduce drug use by placing incentives in direct competition with the drug taking behavior. Therefore, framing incentives as losses, rather than gains should decrease drug use to a greater extent, given equivalent incentives. We examined whether contingent vouchers described as either losses or gains differentially affected smoking abstinence rates. Over 5 consecutive days, participants could either gain $75 per day for verified abstinence or lose $75 per day (initial endowment = $375) for continuing to smoke. As a result, loss-framed participants were more likely to achieve at least one day of abstinence. There was a trend towards loss-framed participants reducing the amount smoked more than gain-framed participants. However, participants in the gain-framed group were more likely to maintain abstinence, once initiated. The results partially support cumulative prospect theory and suggest additional ways to initiate behavior change using incentives, outside of using larger magnitude incentives in contingency management procedures.

AB - Cumulative prospect theory predicts that losses motivate behavior more than equal gains. Contingency management procedures effectively reduce drug use by placing incentives in direct competition with the drug taking behavior. Therefore, framing incentives as losses, rather than gains should decrease drug use to a greater extent, given equivalent incentives. We examined whether contingent vouchers described as either losses or gains differentially affected smoking abstinence rates. Over 5 consecutive days, participants could either gain $75 per day for verified abstinence or lose $75 per day (initial endowment = $375) for continuing to smoke. As a result, loss-framed participants were more likely to achieve at least one day of abstinence. There was a trend towards loss-framed participants reducing the amount smoked more than gain-framed participants. However, participants in the gain-framed group were more likely to maintain abstinence, once initiated. The results partially support cumulative prospect theory and suggest additional ways to initiate behavior change using incentives, outside of using larger magnitude incentives in contingency management procedures.

KW - Cigarette smoking

KW - Contingency management

KW - Cumulative prospect theory

KW - Smoking cessation

KW - Verbal contingency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873591344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873591344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 23403276

AN - SCOPUS:84873591344

VL - 38

SP - 2084

EP - 2088

JO - Addictive Behaviors

JF - Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0306-4603

IS - 4

ER -