The effect of different needle recording electrodes on somatosensory- evoked potentials and intertrial waveform variation

Daniel Dumitru, G. D. Powell, J. C. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-169
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Needles
Electrodes
Tibial Nerve
Temperature
Stainless Steel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{0128d6c8913840c89dcdd676911c4d50,
title = "The effect of different needle recording electrodes on somatosensory- evoked potentials and intertrial waveform variation",
abstract = "This investigation examined the cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) waveforms obtained from four sets of commercially available subdermal needle electrodes in 19 normal subjects. The composite materials of the four electrodes were stainless steel and a platinum/iridium alloy. Tibial nerve SEP peak latencies for P37 and N45 as well as P37/N45 amplitudes were recorded from each electrode pair in a random fashion. Using nonparametric analysis, no significant differences of waveform parameters were found between electrode pairs (P > 0.01). Correlation evaluation demonstrated values in excess of 0.92. Additionally, intertrial waveform analysis for each of the electrode pairs was performed. Again, nonparametric evaluation demonstrated no statistically significant waveform differences. Correlation coefficients were also highly correlative. Variable temperature response to prolonged tibial nerve stimulation was recorded that did not significantly effect the latencies or amplitudes of the cortical SEP responses. We conclude that within temperature ranges typically encountered in clinical practice, there is no statistically significant waveform differences recorded with commonly available subdermal needle electrodes. Additionally, although intertrial waveform variation may exist during SEP recordings, these differences do not reach statistically significant levels.",
keywords = "Evoked Potentials, Instrumentation, Needle Electrodes, Somatosensory-evoked Potentials",
author = "Daniel Dumitru and Powell, {G. D.} and King, {J. C.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1097/00002060-199206000-00007",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "164--169",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of different needle recording electrodes on somatosensory- evoked potentials and intertrial waveform variation

AU - Dumitru, Daniel

AU - Powell, G. D.

AU - King, J. C.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - This investigation examined the cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) waveforms obtained from four sets of commercially available subdermal needle electrodes in 19 normal subjects. The composite materials of the four electrodes were stainless steel and a platinum/iridium alloy. Tibial nerve SEP peak latencies for P37 and N45 as well as P37/N45 amplitudes were recorded from each electrode pair in a random fashion. Using nonparametric analysis, no significant differences of waveform parameters were found between electrode pairs (P > 0.01). Correlation evaluation demonstrated values in excess of 0.92. Additionally, intertrial waveform analysis for each of the electrode pairs was performed. Again, nonparametric evaluation demonstrated no statistically significant waveform differences. Correlation coefficients were also highly correlative. Variable temperature response to prolonged tibial nerve stimulation was recorded that did not significantly effect the latencies or amplitudes of the cortical SEP responses. We conclude that within temperature ranges typically encountered in clinical practice, there is no statistically significant waveform differences recorded with commonly available subdermal needle electrodes. Additionally, although intertrial waveform variation may exist during SEP recordings, these differences do not reach statistically significant levels.

AB - This investigation examined the cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) waveforms obtained from four sets of commercially available subdermal needle electrodes in 19 normal subjects. The composite materials of the four electrodes were stainless steel and a platinum/iridium alloy. Tibial nerve SEP peak latencies for P37 and N45 as well as P37/N45 amplitudes were recorded from each electrode pair in a random fashion. Using nonparametric analysis, no significant differences of waveform parameters were found between electrode pairs (P > 0.01). Correlation evaluation demonstrated values in excess of 0.92. Additionally, intertrial waveform analysis for each of the electrode pairs was performed. Again, nonparametric evaluation demonstrated no statistically significant waveform differences. Correlation coefficients were also highly correlative. Variable temperature response to prolonged tibial nerve stimulation was recorded that did not significantly effect the latencies or amplitudes of the cortical SEP responses. We conclude that within temperature ranges typically encountered in clinical practice, there is no statistically significant waveform differences recorded with commonly available subdermal needle electrodes. Additionally, although intertrial waveform variation may exist during SEP recordings, these differences do not reach statistically significant levels.

KW - Evoked Potentials

KW - Instrumentation

KW - Needle Electrodes

KW - Somatosensory-evoked Potentials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026769039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026769039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00002060-199206000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00002060-199206000-00007

M3 - Article

C2 - 1627281

AN - SCOPUS:0026769039

VL - 71

SP - 164

EP - 169

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 3

ER -