TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of a limited number of projections and reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of megavoltage digital tomosynthesis
AU - Sarkar, Vikren
AU - Shi, Chengyu
AU - Rassiah-Szegedi, Prema
AU - Diaz, Aidnag
AU - Eng, Tony
AU - Papanikolaou, Niko
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - In order to investigate the effect of the number of projections on digital tomosynthesis image quality, images were acquired over a 40 degree arc and sampled into sets of 2 to 41 projections used as input to three different reconstruction algorithms: the shift-and-add, the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress filtered back projection algorithms, and the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique. The variation of several image characteristics, such as in-plane resolution, contrast to noise ratio, artifact spread, volumetric accuracy, and dose, are investigated based on the reconstruction algorithms used and also the number of projections used as source data. The results suggest that only 11 projections are required since the various parameters checked do not improve much past that number. As a reconstruction algorithm, SART did best but took much longer to reconstruct images. Thus, if reconstruction time is a determining factor, filtered back-projection looks like a better compromise.
AB - In order to investigate the effect of the number of projections on digital tomosynthesis image quality, images were acquired over a 40 degree arc and sampled into sets of 2 to 41 projections used as input to three different reconstruction algorithms: the shift-and-add, the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress filtered back projection algorithms, and the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique. The variation of several image characteristics, such as in-plane resolution, contrast to noise ratio, artifact spread, volumetric accuracy, and dose, are investigated based on the reconstruction algorithms used and also the number of projections used as source data. The results suggest that only 11 projections are required since the various parameters checked do not improve much past that number. As a reconstruction algorithm, SART did best but took much longer to reconstruct images. Thus, if reconstruction time is a determining factor, filtered back-projection looks like a better compromise.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77749270511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77749270511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2970
DO - 10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2970
M3 - Article
C2 - 19692978
AN - SCOPUS:77749270511
SN - 1526-9914
VL - 10
SP - 155
EP - 172
JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
IS - 3
ER -