Abstract
This article examines certain critical aspects relating to the clinical competency of professionalism. A discussion is presented which is centered on an analysis of two fictional scenarios explored from the standpoint of a current and a former program director, an associate dean, a department chair, and a lawyer. These cases are followed by a series of questions and a legal discussion which can then be used for either individual study or group discussion.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 494-500 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Academic Radiology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2008 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- physician misconduct
- probation
- professionalism
- Sexual harassment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cite this
The Disruptive Professional. Case Scenarios. / Metter, Darlene F; Harolds, Jay; Rumack, Carol M.; Relyea-Chew, Annemarie; Arenson, Ronald.
In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 494-500.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Disruptive Professional. Case Scenarios
AU - Metter, Darlene F
AU - Harolds, Jay
AU - Rumack, Carol M.
AU - Relyea-Chew, Annemarie
AU - Arenson, Ronald
PY - 2008/4
Y1 - 2008/4
N2 - This article examines certain critical aspects relating to the clinical competency of professionalism. A discussion is presented which is centered on an analysis of two fictional scenarios explored from the standpoint of a current and a former program director, an associate dean, a department chair, and a lawyer. These cases are followed by a series of questions and a legal discussion which can then be used for either individual study or group discussion.
AB - This article examines certain critical aspects relating to the clinical competency of professionalism. A discussion is presented which is centered on an analysis of two fictional scenarios explored from the standpoint of a current and a former program director, an associate dean, a department chair, and a lawyer. These cases are followed by a series of questions and a legal discussion which can then be used for either individual study or group discussion.
KW - physician misconduct
KW - probation
KW - professionalism
KW - Sexual harassment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40649097540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40649097540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.015
DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 18342775
AN - SCOPUS:40649097540
VL - 15
SP - 494
EP - 500
JO - Academic Radiology
JF - Academic Radiology
SN - 1076-6332
IS - 4
ER -