TY - JOUR
T1 - The challenge of offering long-acting antipsychotic therapies
T2 - A preliminary discourse analysis of psychiatrist recommendations for injectable therapy to patients with schizophrenia
AU - Weiden, Peter J.
AU - Roma, Rebecca S.
AU - Velligan, Dawn I.
AU - Alphs, Larry
AU - DiChiara, Matthew
AU - Davidson, Brad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Objective: To characterize patterns of communication in the offer of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medication made by psychiatrists to patients with schizophrenia by (1) examining the style and content of their interaction and (2) determining how these may have driven the ultimate response to recommendations for LAI therapy. Method: This was an observational study conducted at 10 community mental health centers in 3 waves from July 2010 to May 2011. The final dataset for discourse analysis was 33 recorded conversations in which a psychiatrist offered an injectable antipsychotic to a patient with schizophrenia. These visits were transcribed and analyzed by a team of linguists and social scientists. Results: Our primary finding is that, based on analyses of their language during the interview, psychiatrists presented LAI therapy in a negative light. Supporting this, 11 of 33 recommendations (33%) were accepted during the discussion, whereas in the postvisit interview, 27 of 28 patients (96%) who seemed to decline the initial recommendation said they actually would be willing to try LAI treatment. Conclusions: These data support a preliminary hypothesis that the relatively low use of injectable antipsychotic therapies in the United States relative to other parts of the world is not fully attributable to patient rejection of the injectable modality. Rather, psychiatrists' ambivalence regarding the value of LAIs may play a significant role in the perceived difficulty with patient acceptance of this recommendation.
AB - Objective: To characterize patterns of communication in the offer of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medication made by psychiatrists to patients with schizophrenia by (1) examining the style and content of their interaction and (2) determining how these may have driven the ultimate response to recommendations for LAI therapy. Method: This was an observational study conducted at 10 community mental health centers in 3 waves from July 2010 to May 2011. The final dataset for discourse analysis was 33 recorded conversations in which a psychiatrist offered an injectable antipsychotic to a patient with schizophrenia. These visits were transcribed and analyzed by a team of linguists and social scientists. Results: Our primary finding is that, based on analyses of their language during the interview, psychiatrists presented LAI therapy in a negative light. Supporting this, 11 of 33 recommendations (33%) were accepted during the discussion, whereas in the postvisit interview, 27 of 28 patients (96%) who seemed to decline the initial recommendation said they actually would be willing to try LAI treatment. Conclusions: These data support a preliminary hypothesis that the relatively low use of injectable antipsychotic therapies in the United States relative to other parts of the world is not fully attributable to patient rejection of the injectable modality. Rather, psychiatrists' ambivalence regarding the value of LAIs may play a significant role in the perceived difficulty with patient acceptance of this recommendation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932598804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932598804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4088/JCP.13m08946
DO - 10.4088/JCP.13m08946
M3 - Article
C2 - 25939027
AN - SCOPUS:84932598804
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 76
SP - 684
EP - 690
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -