TH‐C‐T‐6C‐08

Initial Experiences with a Dynamic Treatment Simulation System

X. Weng, Y. Yan, V. Ratanatharathorn, J. Penagaricano, C. Shi, L. Berkley, E. Youssef, Nikos Papanikolaou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To present our initial experience with an in‐house developed dynamic treatment simulation platform, PortSim, and evaluate its performance characteristics in the context of conventional and IMRT simulation. Method and Materials: PortSim is a software package that interfaces with a conventional simulator that operates in fluoroscopic mode. A frame grabber is used to obtain live images from the image intensifier (II). The patient's treatment plan, including DRRs, beams, contours and MLCs can be imported into the PortSim environment. The distortion corrected fluoroscopic images can be compared against the DDRs and verify beam and isocenter placement. Both static and dynamic MLCs can be superimposed on the fluoroscopic images to verify beam aperture prior to treatment. Volume contours can also be projected to verify target position and coverage. Patient setup and targeting uncertainty can be quantified at the time of the simulation. The complete simulation process can be recorded for later review and analysis. Results: The PortSim system enabled us to increase our simulation throughput by 30%. It provided a film‐less environment for patient simulation and verification. The maximum image distortion correction error is less than 2 mm, making the digital images readily usable for review and planning purposes. Physician subjective error in reviewing films was significantly reduced due to the improved image quality, direct overlay of DRR and contours. The software allows for DICOM import and export to other devices, including printers. Conclusion: We have developed a comprehensive software package that allows us to improve significantly our film review during the patient's treatment simulation. With features such as direct overlay, side‐by‐ side display on the same screen and improved image quality we can perform simulations more efficiently and more accurately. The simulation process can be recorded and provide valuable information for improving field design and patient immobilization techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2163
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Simulation
Software
Therapeutics
Motion Pictures
Immobilization
Uncertainty
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Weng, X., Yan, Y., Ratanatharathorn, V., Penagaricano, J., Shi, C., Berkley, L., ... Papanikolaou, N. (2005). TH‐C‐T‐6C‐08: Initial Experiences with a Dynamic Treatment Simulation System. Medical Physics, 32(6), 2163. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1998664

TH‐C‐T‐6C‐08 : Initial Experiences with a Dynamic Treatment Simulation System. / Weng, X.; Yan, Y.; Ratanatharathorn, V.; Penagaricano, J.; Shi, C.; Berkley, L.; Youssef, E.; Papanikolaou, Nikos.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2005, p. 2163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weng, X, Yan, Y, Ratanatharathorn, V, Penagaricano, J, Shi, C, Berkley, L, Youssef, E & Papanikolaou, N 2005, 'TH‐C‐T‐6C‐08: Initial Experiences with a Dynamic Treatment Simulation System', Medical Physics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2163. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1998664
Weng X, Yan Y, Ratanatharathorn V, Penagaricano J, Shi C, Berkley L et al. TH‐C‐T‐6C‐08: Initial Experiences with a Dynamic Treatment Simulation System. Medical Physics. 2005;32(6):2163. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1998664
Weng, X. ; Yan, Y. ; Ratanatharathorn, V. ; Penagaricano, J. ; Shi, C. ; Berkley, L. ; Youssef, E. ; Papanikolaou, Nikos. / TH‐C‐T‐6C‐08 : Initial Experiences with a Dynamic Treatment Simulation System. In: Medical Physics. 2005 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 2163.
@article{b2a2dc95ad5c401d80c6432a9af551b0,
title = "TH‐C‐T‐6C‐08: Initial Experiences with a Dynamic Treatment Simulation System",
abstract = "Purpose: To present our initial experience with an in‐house developed dynamic treatment simulation platform, PortSim, and evaluate its performance characteristics in the context of conventional and IMRT simulation. Method and Materials: PortSim is a software package that interfaces with a conventional simulator that operates in fluoroscopic mode. A frame grabber is used to obtain live images from the image intensifier (II). The patient's treatment plan, including DRRs, beams, contours and MLCs can be imported into the PortSim environment. The distortion corrected fluoroscopic images can be compared against the DDRs and verify beam and isocenter placement. Both static and dynamic MLCs can be superimposed on the fluoroscopic images to verify beam aperture prior to treatment. Volume contours can also be projected to verify target position and coverage. Patient setup and targeting uncertainty can be quantified at the time of the simulation. The complete simulation process can be recorded for later review and analysis. Results: The PortSim system enabled us to increase our simulation throughput by 30{\%}. It provided a film‐less environment for patient simulation and verification. The maximum image distortion correction error is less than 2 mm, making the digital images readily usable for review and planning purposes. Physician subjective error in reviewing films was significantly reduced due to the improved image quality, direct overlay of DRR and contours. The software allows for DICOM import and export to other devices, including printers. Conclusion: We have developed a comprehensive software package that allows us to improve significantly our film review during the patient's treatment simulation. With features such as direct overlay, side‐by‐ side display on the same screen and improved image quality we can perform simulations more efficiently and more accurately. The simulation process can be recorded and provide valuable information for improving field design and patient immobilization techniques.",
author = "X. Weng and Y. Yan and V. Ratanatharathorn and J. Penagaricano and C. Shi and L. Berkley and E. Youssef and Nikos Papanikolaou",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1118/1.1998664",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "2163",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TH‐C‐T‐6C‐08

T2 - Initial Experiences with a Dynamic Treatment Simulation System

AU - Weng, X.

AU - Yan, Y.

AU - Ratanatharathorn, V.

AU - Penagaricano, J.

AU - Shi, C.

AU - Berkley, L.

AU - Youssef, E.

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Purpose: To present our initial experience with an in‐house developed dynamic treatment simulation platform, PortSim, and evaluate its performance characteristics in the context of conventional and IMRT simulation. Method and Materials: PortSim is a software package that interfaces with a conventional simulator that operates in fluoroscopic mode. A frame grabber is used to obtain live images from the image intensifier (II). The patient's treatment plan, including DRRs, beams, contours and MLCs can be imported into the PortSim environment. The distortion corrected fluoroscopic images can be compared against the DDRs and verify beam and isocenter placement. Both static and dynamic MLCs can be superimposed on the fluoroscopic images to verify beam aperture prior to treatment. Volume contours can also be projected to verify target position and coverage. Patient setup and targeting uncertainty can be quantified at the time of the simulation. The complete simulation process can be recorded for later review and analysis. Results: The PortSim system enabled us to increase our simulation throughput by 30%. It provided a film‐less environment for patient simulation and verification. The maximum image distortion correction error is less than 2 mm, making the digital images readily usable for review and planning purposes. Physician subjective error in reviewing films was significantly reduced due to the improved image quality, direct overlay of DRR and contours. The software allows for DICOM import and export to other devices, including printers. Conclusion: We have developed a comprehensive software package that allows us to improve significantly our film review during the patient's treatment simulation. With features such as direct overlay, side‐by‐ side display on the same screen and improved image quality we can perform simulations more efficiently and more accurately. The simulation process can be recorded and provide valuable information for improving field design and patient immobilization techniques.

AB - Purpose: To present our initial experience with an in‐house developed dynamic treatment simulation platform, PortSim, and evaluate its performance characteristics in the context of conventional and IMRT simulation. Method and Materials: PortSim is a software package that interfaces with a conventional simulator that operates in fluoroscopic mode. A frame grabber is used to obtain live images from the image intensifier (II). The patient's treatment plan, including DRRs, beams, contours and MLCs can be imported into the PortSim environment. The distortion corrected fluoroscopic images can be compared against the DDRs and verify beam and isocenter placement. Both static and dynamic MLCs can be superimposed on the fluoroscopic images to verify beam aperture prior to treatment. Volume contours can also be projected to verify target position and coverage. Patient setup and targeting uncertainty can be quantified at the time of the simulation. The complete simulation process can be recorded for later review and analysis. Results: The PortSim system enabled us to increase our simulation throughput by 30%. It provided a film‐less environment for patient simulation and verification. The maximum image distortion correction error is less than 2 mm, making the digital images readily usable for review and planning purposes. Physician subjective error in reviewing films was significantly reduced due to the improved image quality, direct overlay of DRR and contours. The software allows for DICOM import and export to other devices, including printers. Conclusion: We have developed a comprehensive software package that allows us to improve significantly our film review during the patient's treatment simulation. With features such as direct overlay, side‐by‐ side display on the same screen and improved image quality we can perform simulations more efficiently and more accurately. The simulation process can be recorded and provide valuable information for improving field design and patient immobilization techniques.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024790175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024790175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1998664

DO - 10.1118/1.1998664

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 2163

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -