Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction

I. Lehr Brisbin, Steven N. Austad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the scent had been collected. The dogs were successful at distinguishing scent obtained from the hand of their handler from that from the hands of strangers, but could not similarly distinguish their handler's scent when it was obtained from the crook of his arm. These results suggest either that there is no such thing as an individual human odour or that dogs trained with standard methods do not spontaneously identify individual odour components of scents taken from different parts of the body. The results also call into question the practice of using dogs to identify individuals from scented objects in law enforcement, unless the dogs used can be shown to be capable of performing discriminations of the type unsuccessfully attempted by the animals in the present study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-69
Number of pages7
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

olfaction
smell
odor
odors
dogs
testing
law enforcement
hands
dog
animal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction. / Brisbin, I. Lehr; Austad, Steven N.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1991, p. 63-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brisbin, I. Lehr ; Austad, Steven N. / Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction. In: Animal Behaviour. 1991 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 63-69.
@article{14287c8f2fbc48f882188c85c6652c5e,
title = "Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction",
abstract = "Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the scent had been collected. The dogs were successful at distinguishing scent obtained from the hand of their handler from that from the hands of strangers, but could not similarly distinguish their handler's scent when it was obtained from the crook of his arm. These results suggest either that there is no such thing as an individual human odour or that dogs trained with standard methods do not spontaneously identify individual odour components of scents taken from different parts of the body. The results also call into question the practice of using dogs to identify individuals from scented objects in law enforcement, unless the dogs used can be shown to be capable of performing discriminations of the type unsuccessfully attempted by the animals in the present study.",
author = "Brisbin, {I. Lehr} and Austad, {Steven N.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80606-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "63--69",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction

AU - Brisbin, I. Lehr

AU - Austad, Steven N.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the scent had been collected. The dogs were successful at distinguishing scent obtained from the hand of their handler from that from the hands of strangers, but could not similarly distinguish their handler's scent when it was obtained from the crook of his arm. These results suggest either that there is no such thing as an individual human odour or that dogs trained with standard methods do not spontaneously identify individual odour components of scents taken from different parts of the body. The results also call into question the practice of using dogs to identify individuals from scented objects in law enforcement, unless the dogs used can be shown to be capable of performing discriminations of the type unsuccessfully attempted by the animals in the present study.

AB - Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the scent had been collected. The dogs were successful at distinguishing scent obtained from the hand of their handler from that from the hands of strangers, but could not similarly distinguish their handler's scent when it was obtained from the crook of his arm. These results suggest either that there is no such thing as an individual human odour or that dogs trained with standard methods do not spontaneously identify individual odour components of scents taken from different parts of the body. The results also call into question the practice of using dogs to identify individuals from scented objects in law enforcement, unless the dogs used can be shown to be capable of performing discriminations of the type unsuccessfully attempted by the animals in the present study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025955161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025955161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80606-2

DO - 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80606-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025955161

VL - 42

SP - 63

EP - 69

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

IS - 1

ER -