Teaching Quality Measurement and Improvement, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction in Undergraduate Medical Education: The UME-21 Experience

Bruce E. Gould, Mark T. O'Connell, Margaret T. Russell, Catherine F. Pipas, Fredrick A. McCurdy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The health care system in the United States is changing at an ever-increasing rate. Recent reports by the Institute of Medicine raising concerns regarding rates of medical errors and suggesting the need for reengineering of the health care delivery system have focused attention on the need for quality measurement and improvement. Methods: We abstracted data from final written reports submitted by 18 Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) schools, as well as other materials available from participating UME-21 schools. Specific curricular innovations developed and implemented were identified. Additionally, senior medical students' responses to the annual Graduation Questionnaire administered by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) were available for analysis. The change from 1999 to 2001 in the proportion of seniors rating instruction in quality assurance as adequate was compared among four groups of UME-21 schools and the other 107 US medical schools. Results: Eleven of the 18 schools specifically addressed the content areas of quality measurement and improvement, including utilization management (27% of schools), cost-effectiveness (45% of schools), use of clinical practice guidelines (73% of schools), and patient satisfaction assessment (45% of schools). Each school developed unique approaches and educational materials pertinent to the content area. Overall, the percentage of seniors rating the relative amount of instructional time devoted to quality assurance in medicine by their school's curriculum as adequate or better rose from 49% to 66% between 1999 and 2001 at the 11 UME-21 schools that introduced initiatives in quality improvement into their curricula. This change was significantly higher than the pattern at other US medical schools between 1999 and 2001, at which seniors' ratings rose only from 43% to 56%. Conclusions: Curriculum development and implementation addressing quality improvement in medical practice accelerate improvement of students' perception that their education has adequately addressed this subject area. This article summarizes some of the experiences, curricular approaches, successes, failures, and lessons learned in quality improvement by schools participating in the UME-21 project.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume36
Issue numberSUPPL.
StatePublished - Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Undergraduate Medical Education
Quality Improvement
Patient Satisfaction
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Teaching
Curriculum
Delivery of Health Care
Medical Schools
Medical Errors
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
American Medical Association
Medical Students
Practice Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Teaching Quality Measurement and Improvement, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction in Undergraduate Medical Education : The UME-21 Experience. / Gould, Bruce E.; O'Connell, Mark T.; Russell, Margaret T.; Pipas, Catherine F.; McCurdy, Fredrick A.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 36, No. SUPPL., 01.2004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gould, Bruce E. ; O'Connell, Mark T. ; Russell, Margaret T. ; Pipas, Catherine F. ; McCurdy, Fredrick A. / Teaching Quality Measurement and Improvement, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction in Undergraduate Medical Education : The UME-21 Experience. In: Family Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 36, No. SUPPL.
@article{32b6ded82157426d9976adf51909997d,
title = "Teaching Quality Measurement and Improvement, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction in Undergraduate Medical Education: The UME-21 Experience",
abstract = "Background: The health care system in the United States is changing at an ever-increasing rate. Recent reports by the Institute of Medicine raising concerns regarding rates of medical errors and suggesting the need for reengineering of the health care delivery system have focused attention on the need for quality measurement and improvement. Methods: We abstracted data from final written reports submitted by 18 Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) schools, as well as other materials available from participating UME-21 schools. Specific curricular innovations developed and implemented were identified. Additionally, senior medical students' responses to the annual Graduation Questionnaire administered by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) were available for analysis. The change from 1999 to 2001 in the proportion of seniors rating instruction in quality assurance as adequate was compared among four groups of UME-21 schools and the other 107 US medical schools. Results: Eleven of the 18 schools specifically addressed the content areas of quality measurement and improvement, including utilization management (27{\%} of schools), cost-effectiveness (45{\%} of schools), use of clinical practice guidelines (73{\%} of schools), and patient satisfaction assessment (45{\%} of schools). Each school developed unique approaches and educational materials pertinent to the content area. Overall, the percentage of seniors rating the relative amount of instructional time devoted to quality assurance in medicine by their school's curriculum as adequate or better rose from 49{\%} to 66{\%} between 1999 and 2001 at the 11 UME-21 schools that introduced initiatives in quality improvement into their curricula. This change was significantly higher than the pattern at other US medical schools between 1999 and 2001, at which seniors' ratings rose only from 43{\%} to 56{\%}. Conclusions: Curriculum development and implementation addressing quality improvement in medical practice accelerate improvement of students' perception that their education has adequately addressed this subject area. This article summarizes some of the experiences, curricular approaches, successes, failures, and lessons learned in quality improvement by schools participating in the UME-21 project.",
author = "Gould, {Bruce E.} and O'Connell, {Mark T.} and Russell, {Margaret T.} and Pipas, {Catherine F.} and McCurdy, {Fredrick A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching Quality Measurement and Improvement, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction in Undergraduate Medical Education

T2 - The UME-21 Experience

AU - Gould, Bruce E.

AU - O'Connell, Mark T.

AU - Russell, Margaret T.

AU - Pipas, Catherine F.

AU - McCurdy, Fredrick A.

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Background: The health care system in the United States is changing at an ever-increasing rate. Recent reports by the Institute of Medicine raising concerns regarding rates of medical errors and suggesting the need for reengineering of the health care delivery system have focused attention on the need for quality measurement and improvement. Methods: We abstracted data from final written reports submitted by 18 Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) schools, as well as other materials available from participating UME-21 schools. Specific curricular innovations developed and implemented were identified. Additionally, senior medical students' responses to the annual Graduation Questionnaire administered by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) were available for analysis. The change from 1999 to 2001 in the proportion of seniors rating instruction in quality assurance as adequate was compared among four groups of UME-21 schools and the other 107 US medical schools. Results: Eleven of the 18 schools specifically addressed the content areas of quality measurement and improvement, including utilization management (27% of schools), cost-effectiveness (45% of schools), use of clinical practice guidelines (73% of schools), and patient satisfaction assessment (45% of schools). Each school developed unique approaches and educational materials pertinent to the content area. Overall, the percentage of seniors rating the relative amount of instructional time devoted to quality assurance in medicine by their school's curriculum as adequate or better rose from 49% to 66% between 1999 and 2001 at the 11 UME-21 schools that introduced initiatives in quality improvement into their curricula. This change was significantly higher than the pattern at other US medical schools between 1999 and 2001, at which seniors' ratings rose only from 43% to 56%. Conclusions: Curriculum development and implementation addressing quality improvement in medical practice accelerate improvement of students' perception that their education has adequately addressed this subject area. This article summarizes some of the experiences, curricular approaches, successes, failures, and lessons learned in quality improvement by schools participating in the UME-21 project.

AB - Background: The health care system in the United States is changing at an ever-increasing rate. Recent reports by the Institute of Medicine raising concerns regarding rates of medical errors and suggesting the need for reengineering of the health care delivery system have focused attention on the need for quality measurement and improvement. Methods: We abstracted data from final written reports submitted by 18 Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) schools, as well as other materials available from participating UME-21 schools. Specific curricular innovations developed and implemented were identified. Additionally, senior medical students' responses to the annual Graduation Questionnaire administered by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) were available for analysis. The change from 1999 to 2001 in the proportion of seniors rating instruction in quality assurance as adequate was compared among four groups of UME-21 schools and the other 107 US medical schools. Results: Eleven of the 18 schools specifically addressed the content areas of quality measurement and improvement, including utilization management (27% of schools), cost-effectiveness (45% of schools), use of clinical practice guidelines (73% of schools), and patient satisfaction assessment (45% of schools). Each school developed unique approaches and educational materials pertinent to the content area. Overall, the percentage of seniors rating the relative amount of instructional time devoted to quality assurance in medicine by their school's curriculum as adequate or better rose from 49% to 66% between 1999 and 2001 at the 11 UME-21 schools that introduced initiatives in quality improvement into their curricula. This change was significantly higher than the pattern at other US medical schools between 1999 and 2001, at which seniors' ratings rose only from 43% to 56%. Conclusions: Curriculum development and implementation addressing quality improvement in medical practice accelerate improvement of students' perception that their education has adequately addressed this subject area. This article summarizes some of the experiences, curricular approaches, successes, failures, and lessons learned in quality improvement by schools participating in the UME-21 project.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0442326330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0442326330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14961404

AN - SCOPUS:0442326330

VL - 36

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - SUPPL.

ER -