Taxonomic Validation: An Overview

Mary Kerr; Lois M. Hoskins; Joyce J. Fitzpatrick; Judith J. Warren; Kay C. Avant; Mary Hurley; Margaret Lunney; Winnifred C. Mills; Barbara C. Rottkamp

doi:10.1111/j.1744-618X.1993.tb00078.x

Taxonomic Validation: An Overview

Mary Kerr, Lois M. Hoskins, Joyce J. Fitzpatrick, Judith J. Warren, Kay C. Avant, Mary Hurley, Margaret Lunney, Winnifred C. Mills, Barbara C. Rottkamp

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

A valid taxonomy legitimizes the elements that make up the taxonomy and increases trust in its generalizability and predictability. There is a concern that the NANDA Taxonomy is not a valid taxanomic structure. Despite on‐going work to validate individual nursing diagnoses, there is little research that focuses on validation of groups of diagnoses (taxons) within the NANDA taxonomy. This last article in a series of four will familiarize the readers with why, what, and how a taxonomy of nursing diagnoses can be validated. This article highlights assessment of the validity and reliability of a taxonomy, compares the process of taxonomic validation to the research process, and explores examples of validation design

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	6-14
Number of pages	9
Journal	International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications
Volume	4
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618X.1993.tb00078.x
State	Published - 1993
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

nursing diagnosis
taxonomy
validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)
Fundamentals and skills
Nursing (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1744-618X.1993.tb00078.x

Cite this

@article{96a0293422d5496cade325aafc89aa8a,

title = "Taxonomic Validation: An Overview",

abstract = "A valid taxonomy legitimizes the elements that make up the taxonomy and increases trust in its generalizability and predictability. There is a concern that the NANDA Taxonomy is not a valid taxanomic structure. Despite on‐going work to validate individual nursing diagnoses, there is little research that focuses on validation of groups of diagnoses (taxons) within the NANDA taxonomy. This last article in a series of four will familiarize the readers with why, what, and how a taxonomy of nursing diagnoses can be validated. This article highlights assessment of the validity and reliability of a taxonomy, compares the process of taxonomic validation to the research process, and explores examples of validation design",

keywords = "nursing diagnosis, taxonomy, validation",

author = "Mary Kerr and Hoskins, {Lois M.} and Fitzpatrick, {Joyce J.} and Warren, {Judith J.} and Avant, {Kay C.} and Mary Hurley and Margaret Lunney and Mills, {Winnifred C.} and Rottkamp, {Barbara C.}",

year = "1993",

doi = "10.1111/j.1744-618X.1993.tb00078.x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "4",

pages = "6--14",

journal = "International journal of nursing knowledge",

issn = "2047-3087",

publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taxonomic Validation

T2 - An Overview

AU - Kerr, Mary

AU - Hoskins, Lois M.

AU - Fitzpatrick, Joyce J.

AU - Warren, Judith J.

AU - Avant, Kay C.

AU - Hurley, Mary

AU - Lunney, Margaret

AU - Mills, Winnifred C.

AU - Rottkamp, Barbara C.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - A valid taxonomy legitimizes the elements that make up the taxonomy and increases trust in its generalizability and predictability. There is a concern that the NANDA Taxonomy is not a valid taxanomic structure. Despite on‐going work to validate individual nursing diagnoses, there is little research that focuses on validation of groups of diagnoses (taxons) within the NANDA taxonomy. This last article in a series of four will familiarize the readers with why, what, and how a taxonomy of nursing diagnoses can be validated. This article highlights assessment of the validity and reliability of a taxonomy, compares the process of taxonomic validation to the research process, and explores examples of validation design

AB - A valid taxonomy legitimizes the elements that make up the taxonomy and increases trust in its generalizability and predictability. There is a concern that the NANDA Taxonomy is not a valid taxanomic structure. Despite on‐going work to validate individual nursing diagnoses, there is little research that focuses on validation of groups of diagnoses (taxons) within the NANDA taxonomy. This last article in a series of four will familiarize the readers with why, what, and how a taxonomy of nursing diagnoses can be validated. This article highlights assessment of the validity and reliability of a taxonomy, compares the process of taxonomic validation to the research process, and explores examples of validation design

KW - nursing diagnosis

KW - taxonomy

KW - validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985059192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985059192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-618X.1993.tb00078.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1744-618X.1993.tb00078.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 8363917

AN - SCOPUS:84985059192

VL - 4

SP - 6

EP - 14

JO - International journal of nursing knowledge

JF - International journal of nursing knowledge

SN - 2047-3087

IS - 1

ER -

Taxonomic Validation: An Overview

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this