Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumours categorised by R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score

  • Ryan P. Kopp
  • , Reza Mehrazin
  • , Kerrin L. Palazzi
  • , Michael A. Liss
  • , Ramzi Jabaji
  • , Hossein S. Mirheydar
  • , Hak J. Lee
  • , Nishant Patel
  • , Fuad Elkhoury
  • , Anthony L. Patterson
  • , Ithaar H. Derweesh

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objective We evaluated survival outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for clinical T2 renal masses (cT2RM) controlling for R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Patients and Methods A two-centre study comprised of 202 patients with cT2RM who underwent RN (122) or PN (80) between July 2002 and June 2012 (median follow-up 41.5 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis compared overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among the entire cohort and within categories of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of ≥10 and <10. Association between procedure and PFS and OS was analysed using Cox-proportional hazard. Results There were no significant differences between PN and RN in clinical T stage and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores. For RN and PN, the 5-year PFS was 69.8% and 79.9% (P = 0.115), CSS was 82.5% and 86.7% (P = 0.407), and OS was 80% and 83.3% (P = 0.291). Cox regression showed no association between RN vs PN and PFS; a R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of ≥10 was associated with a shorter PFS (hazard ratio 6.69, P = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis for RN vs PN showed no difference in PFS for entire cohort or within the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score categories of ≥10 and <10. The PFS was better for those with R.E.N.A.L nephrometry scores of <10 vs ≥10 (P < 0.001) and for cT2a vs cT2b tumours (P = 0.012). OS was no different between cT2a and cT2b tumours; patients with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of ≥10 were more likely to die from disease (P < 0.001) or any cause (P < 0.001) vs those with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of <10. Conclusions PN may be oncologically effective for cT2RM. A R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score of ≥10 is negatively associated with OS among cT2RM compared with a score of <10 and provides additional risk assessment beyond clinical T stage. Further follow-up and prospective randomised investigation is requisite to confirm efficacy of PN for cT2RM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)708-718
Number of pages11
JournalBJU International
Volume114
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry
  • Stage 2
  • carcinoma
  • disease-free survival
  • nephrectomy
  • progression-free survival
  • renal cell

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumours categorised by R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this