Surgically induced necrotizing scleritis (SINS): Is it a standalone condition or a variant of necrotizing scleritis?

  • Kowsigan Magesan
  • , Parthopratim Dutta Majumder
  • , Mamta Agarwal
  • , Amala E. George
  • , Vinita Nair
  • , Sudha K. Ganesh
  • , Jyotirmay Biswas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To report the clinical pattern of surgically induced necrotizing scleritis (SINS) in a tertiary eye care center in Southern India. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all SINS cases visiting the uveitis clinic of a tertiary eye institute between January 2009 and April 2019. Results: In total, 15 patients with a median age of 65 (IQR: 52-70) years were included in the study. Male (53%) predominance was noted, and SINS was unilateral (100%) in all cases. Most (87%) of the patients developed SINS after a single surgical procedure, with a median onset period of 251 (IQR: 127-1095) days. None of these patients had any evidence of systemic association. Ocular hypertension (n = 3, 20%), and cataract (n = 5, 33%) were the most common complications. When compared with a cohort of patients with idiopathic necrotizing scleritis, the index study did not find any statistically significant difference between SINS and idiopathic scleritis. Conclusion: SINS is idiopathic necrotizing scleritis rather than an independent entity of scleritis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S592-S595
JournalIndian Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume72
Issue numberSuppl 4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Corticosteroid
  • immunosuppression
  • necrotizing scleritis
  • surgically induced necrotizing scleritis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgically induced necrotizing scleritis (SINS): Is it a standalone condition or a variant of necrotizing scleritis?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this