TY - JOUR
T1 - Suicide Intervention Practices
T2 - What Is Being Used by Mental Health Clinicians and Mental Health Allies?
AU - Rozek, David C.
AU - Tyler, Hannah
AU - Fina, Brooke A.
AU - Baker, Shelby N.
AU - Moring, John C.
AU - Smith, Noelle B.
AU - Baker, Justin C.
AU - Bryan, Annabelle O.
AU - Bryan, Craig J.
AU - Dondanville, Katherine A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Academy for Suicide Research.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objective: Implementation of evidence-based suicide prevention is critical to prevent death by suicide. Contrary to previously held beliefs, interventions including contracting for safety, no-harm contracts, and no-suicide contracts are not best practices and are considered contraindicated. Little is known about the current use of best practices and contraindicated interventions for suicide prevention in community settings. Methods: Data were collected from 771 individuals enrolled in a suicide prevention training. Both mental health clinicians (n = 613) and mental health allies (e.g., teachers, first responders) (n = 158) reported which best practices (i.e., safety plan, crisis response plan) and contraindicated interventions (i.e., contracting for safety, no-harm contract, no-suicide contract) they use with individuals who presents with risk for suicide. Results: The majority of both mental health clinicians (89.7%) and mental health allies (67.1%) endorsed using at least one evidence-based practice. However, of those who endorsed using evidence-based interventions, ∼40% of both mental health clinicians and allies endorsed using contraindicated interventions as well. Conclusion: Contraindicated interventions are being used at high rates and suicide prevention trainings for evidence-based interventions should include a focus on de-implementation of contraindicated interventions. This study examined only a snapshot of what clinicians and allies endorsed using. Additional in depth information about each intervention and when it is used would provide helpful information and should be considered in future studies. Future research is needed to ensure only evidence-based interventions are being used to help prevent death by suicide.Highlights: The majority of both mental health clinicians and mental health allies use evidence-based practices for suicide prevention. This indicates good implementation rates of evidence-based interventions for suicide prevention. Approximately 40% of both mental health clinicians and mental health allies who endorsed using evidence-based practices for suicide preventions also endorsed using contraindicated interventions. A focus on de-implementation of contraindicated suicide interventions is warranted and should be part of the focus on suicide prevention efforts.
AB - Objective: Implementation of evidence-based suicide prevention is critical to prevent death by suicide. Contrary to previously held beliefs, interventions including contracting for safety, no-harm contracts, and no-suicide contracts are not best practices and are considered contraindicated. Little is known about the current use of best practices and contraindicated interventions for suicide prevention in community settings. Methods: Data were collected from 771 individuals enrolled in a suicide prevention training. Both mental health clinicians (n = 613) and mental health allies (e.g., teachers, first responders) (n = 158) reported which best practices (i.e., safety plan, crisis response plan) and contraindicated interventions (i.e., contracting for safety, no-harm contract, no-suicide contract) they use with individuals who presents with risk for suicide. Results: The majority of both mental health clinicians (89.7%) and mental health allies (67.1%) endorsed using at least one evidence-based practice. However, of those who endorsed using evidence-based interventions, ∼40% of both mental health clinicians and allies endorsed using contraindicated interventions as well. Conclusion: Contraindicated interventions are being used at high rates and suicide prevention trainings for evidence-based interventions should include a focus on de-implementation of contraindicated interventions. This study examined only a snapshot of what clinicians and allies endorsed using. Additional in depth information about each intervention and when it is used would provide helpful information and should be considered in future studies. Future research is needed to ensure only evidence-based interventions are being used to help prevent death by suicide.Highlights: The majority of both mental health clinicians and mental health allies use evidence-based practices for suicide prevention. This indicates good implementation rates of evidence-based interventions for suicide prevention. Approximately 40% of both mental health clinicians and mental health allies who endorsed using evidence-based practices for suicide preventions also endorsed using contraindicated interventions. A focus on de-implementation of contraindicated suicide interventions is warranted and should be part of the focus on suicide prevention efforts.
KW - Crisis response planning
KW - safety planning
KW - suicide
KW - suicide prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164977758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164977758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13811118.2022.2106923
DO - 10.1080/13811118.2022.2106923
M3 - Article
C2 - 35943133
AN - SCOPUS:85164977758
SN - 1381-1118
VL - 27
SP - 1034
EP - 1046
JO - Archives of Suicide Research
JF - Archives of Suicide Research
IS - 3
ER -