SU‐E‐T‐379: Assessment of the Dosimetric Significance of Isocenter Shift by Means of EPIDQA

Nikos Papanikolaou, l. Vazquez Quino, Sotirios Stathakis, A. Gutierrez, C. Esquivel, H. Alkhatib

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: An EPID based tool for IMRT quality assurance was used to investigate the dosimestric significance of an isocenter shift. Methods: The MU‐EPID software was used to calculate the dose of the measured QA and compare this against the TPS dose calculation in the original CT patient anatomy. Once the dose has been calculated, the isocenter is shifted and a new dose calculation was obtained and compared against the original dose calculation of the plan. Isocenter shifts ranged from 1mm to 5mm were introduced in order to compute the dose based on the EPID based QA images. Once the dose with the isocenter shift was calculated, a dose comparison against the un‐shifted plan was performed. In addition, a gamma index analysis was performed between the two plans. Results: Preliminary results comparing the percent dose difference of the shifted plan to the original plan show that lateral shift of the isocenter has the maximum impact in the absolute point dose at the isocenter with a maximum percent difference of 4.58%. Anterior‐posterior shifts exhibit minimum variation in the dose calculation of the dose at isocenter with an average of 1.69 % dose differences at the isocenter. For the gamma analysis, the lateral shift had the minimum impact while anterior‐posterior isocenter shift had the greatest impact with a gamma of 89.9% passing with a 3% dose and 3mm distance to agreement criteria. Deviation of the original QA results is detectable down to a shift that is as small as 1mm based on our results. Conclusions: The present investigation shows the importance of the patient positioning during treatment delivery since very small deviation of the isocenter can have a great impact in the dosimetry of the IMRT plan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3791
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Patient Positioning
Anatomy
Software
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐379 : Assessment of the Dosimetric Significance of Isocenter Shift by Means of EPIDQA. / Papanikolaou, Nikos; Quino, l. Vazquez; Stathakis, Sotirios; Gutierrez, A.; Esquivel, C.; Alkhatib, H.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2012, p. 3791.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Papanikolaou, Nikos ; Quino, l. Vazquez ; Stathakis, Sotirios ; Gutierrez, A. ; Esquivel, C. ; Alkhatib, H. / SU‐E‐T‐379 : Assessment of the Dosimetric Significance of Isocenter Shift by Means of EPIDQA. In: Medical Physics. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 3791.
@article{21e1701e5f514abf9b5d53737edadff7,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐379: Assessment of the Dosimetric Significance of Isocenter Shift by Means of EPIDQA",
abstract = "Purpose: An EPID based tool for IMRT quality assurance was used to investigate the dosimestric significance of an isocenter shift. Methods: The MU‐EPID software was used to calculate the dose of the measured QA and compare this against the TPS dose calculation in the original CT patient anatomy. Once the dose has been calculated, the isocenter is shifted and a new dose calculation was obtained and compared against the original dose calculation of the plan. Isocenter shifts ranged from 1mm to 5mm were introduced in order to compute the dose based on the EPID based QA images. Once the dose with the isocenter shift was calculated, a dose comparison against the un‐shifted plan was performed. In addition, a gamma index analysis was performed between the two plans. Results: Preliminary results comparing the percent dose difference of the shifted plan to the original plan show that lateral shift of the isocenter has the maximum impact in the absolute point dose at the isocenter with a maximum percent difference of 4.58{\%}. Anterior‐posterior shifts exhibit minimum variation in the dose calculation of the dose at isocenter with an average of 1.69 {\%} dose differences at the isocenter. For the gamma analysis, the lateral shift had the minimum impact while anterior‐posterior isocenter shift had the greatest impact with a gamma of 89.9{\%} passing with a 3{\%} dose and 3mm distance to agreement criteria. Deviation of the original QA results is detectable down to a shift that is as small as 1mm based on our results. Conclusions: The present investigation shows the importance of the patient positioning during treatment delivery since very small deviation of the isocenter can have a great impact in the dosimetry of the IMRT plan.",
author = "Nikos Papanikolaou and Quino, {l. Vazquez} and Sotirios Stathakis and A. Gutierrez and C. Esquivel and H. Alkhatib",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1118/1.4735466",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "3791",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐379

T2 - Assessment of the Dosimetric Significance of Isocenter Shift by Means of EPIDQA

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

AU - Quino, l. Vazquez

AU - Stathakis, Sotirios

AU - Gutierrez, A.

AU - Esquivel, C.

AU - Alkhatib, H.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: An EPID based tool for IMRT quality assurance was used to investigate the dosimestric significance of an isocenter shift. Methods: The MU‐EPID software was used to calculate the dose of the measured QA and compare this against the TPS dose calculation in the original CT patient anatomy. Once the dose has been calculated, the isocenter is shifted and a new dose calculation was obtained and compared against the original dose calculation of the plan. Isocenter shifts ranged from 1mm to 5mm were introduced in order to compute the dose based on the EPID based QA images. Once the dose with the isocenter shift was calculated, a dose comparison against the un‐shifted plan was performed. In addition, a gamma index analysis was performed between the two plans. Results: Preliminary results comparing the percent dose difference of the shifted plan to the original plan show that lateral shift of the isocenter has the maximum impact in the absolute point dose at the isocenter with a maximum percent difference of 4.58%. Anterior‐posterior shifts exhibit minimum variation in the dose calculation of the dose at isocenter with an average of 1.69 % dose differences at the isocenter. For the gamma analysis, the lateral shift had the minimum impact while anterior‐posterior isocenter shift had the greatest impact with a gamma of 89.9% passing with a 3% dose and 3mm distance to agreement criteria. Deviation of the original QA results is detectable down to a shift that is as small as 1mm based on our results. Conclusions: The present investigation shows the importance of the patient positioning during treatment delivery since very small deviation of the isocenter can have a great impact in the dosimetry of the IMRT plan.

AB - Purpose: An EPID based tool for IMRT quality assurance was used to investigate the dosimestric significance of an isocenter shift. Methods: The MU‐EPID software was used to calculate the dose of the measured QA and compare this against the TPS dose calculation in the original CT patient anatomy. Once the dose has been calculated, the isocenter is shifted and a new dose calculation was obtained and compared against the original dose calculation of the plan. Isocenter shifts ranged from 1mm to 5mm were introduced in order to compute the dose based on the EPID based QA images. Once the dose with the isocenter shift was calculated, a dose comparison against the un‐shifted plan was performed. In addition, a gamma index analysis was performed between the two plans. Results: Preliminary results comparing the percent dose difference of the shifted plan to the original plan show that lateral shift of the isocenter has the maximum impact in the absolute point dose at the isocenter with a maximum percent difference of 4.58%. Anterior‐posterior shifts exhibit minimum variation in the dose calculation of the dose at isocenter with an average of 1.69 % dose differences at the isocenter. For the gamma analysis, the lateral shift had the minimum impact while anterior‐posterior isocenter shift had the greatest impact with a gamma of 89.9% passing with a 3% dose and 3mm distance to agreement criteria. Deviation of the original QA results is detectable down to a shift that is as small as 1mm based on our results. Conclusions: The present investigation shows the importance of the patient positioning during treatment delivery since very small deviation of the isocenter can have a great impact in the dosimetry of the IMRT plan.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024803455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024803455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4735466

DO - 10.1118/1.4735466

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024803455

VL - 39

SP - 3791

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -