SU‐E‐T‐212

To Evaluate Significance of Gamma Index Between the Measurement of 2D Detector Arrays and the Calculated Patient 3D Dose Distribution

S. Kim, Y. Qiu, P. Mavroidis, Nikos Papanikolaou, Sotirios Stathakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate significance of gamma index between the measurement of 2D detector arrays and the calculated patient 3D dose distribution. Methods: DMLC (Dynamic Multi‐Leaf Collimator) of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radio Therapy) delivery information recorded in log files during delivery. The Dynalog file includes amongst other, the beam on and off status, segment dose index, and individual leaf positions. In this study, three previous treated IMRT patient plans are selected and delivered using a Varian CLINAC 600 C/D linear accelerator equipped with Millennium 120 MLC. Patient specific measurements were obtained using the PTW OCTAVIUS II system for all individual fields, while simultaneously recording the Dynalog file. Using an in‐house Matlab code, the dynalog data are converted to an adapted format of fluence map to Eclipse v8.9 treatment planning system. Using the Dynalog file based fluence maps we are able to calculate the dose for each field and the also to calculate the patient dose distribution. Comparisons of individual fields and of the patient 3D distribution were then performed and the analysis was based on gamma index passing rate for the individual fields, and DVH and dose differences for the patient dose distributions. Results: Our study confirms that the measured planar dose for individual fields has a good agreement to the calculated dose using the DMLC Dynalog file fluence maps. Filed by field analysis between detector measured and dynalog file fluence based calculations had 94.2% passing pixels using 3mm/3% criteria. Conclusion: Results show that the calculated dose based on Dynalog record is comparable to measured dose on PTW OCTAVIUS II detector. Gamma index values showed the reasonable dosimetric identity between two dose distributions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Radio
Particle Accelerators
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐212 : To Evaluate Significance of Gamma Index Between the Measurement of 2D Detector Arrays and the Calculated Patient 3D Dose Distribution. / Kim, S.; Qiu, Y.; Mavroidis, P.; Papanikolaou, Nikos; Stathakis, Sotirios.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2013, p. 253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f02b84a794442638817d72499d2dc39,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐212: To Evaluate Significance of Gamma Index Between the Measurement of 2D Detector Arrays and the Calculated Patient 3D Dose Distribution",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate significance of gamma index between the measurement of 2D detector arrays and the calculated patient 3D dose distribution. Methods: DMLC (Dynamic Multi‐Leaf Collimator) of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radio Therapy) delivery information recorded in log files during delivery. The Dynalog file includes amongst other, the beam on and off status, segment dose index, and individual leaf positions. In this study, three previous treated IMRT patient plans are selected and delivered using a Varian CLINAC 600 C/D linear accelerator equipped with Millennium 120 MLC. Patient specific measurements were obtained using the PTW OCTAVIUS II system for all individual fields, while simultaneously recording the Dynalog file. Using an in‐house Matlab code, the dynalog data are converted to an adapted format of fluence map to Eclipse v8.9 treatment planning system. Using the Dynalog file based fluence maps we are able to calculate the dose for each field and the also to calculate the patient dose distribution. Comparisons of individual fields and of the patient 3D distribution were then performed and the analysis was based on gamma index passing rate for the individual fields, and DVH and dose differences for the patient dose distributions. Results: Our study confirms that the measured planar dose for individual fields has a good agreement to the calculated dose using the DMLC Dynalog file fluence maps. Filed by field analysis between detector measured and dynalog file fluence based calculations had 94.2{\%} passing pixels using 3mm/3{\%} criteria. Conclusion: Results show that the calculated dose based on Dynalog record is comparable to measured dose on PTW OCTAVIUS II detector. Gamma index values showed the reasonable dosimetric identity between two dose distributions.",
author = "S. Kim and Y. Qiu and P. Mavroidis and Nikos Papanikolaou and Sotirios Stathakis",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1118/1.4814647",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "253",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐212

T2 - To Evaluate Significance of Gamma Index Between the Measurement of 2D Detector Arrays and the Calculated Patient 3D Dose Distribution

AU - Kim, S.

AU - Qiu, Y.

AU - Mavroidis, P.

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

AU - Stathakis, Sotirios

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate significance of gamma index between the measurement of 2D detector arrays and the calculated patient 3D dose distribution. Methods: DMLC (Dynamic Multi‐Leaf Collimator) of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radio Therapy) delivery information recorded in log files during delivery. The Dynalog file includes amongst other, the beam on and off status, segment dose index, and individual leaf positions. In this study, three previous treated IMRT patient plans are selected and delivered using a Varian CLINAC 600 C/D linear accelerator equipped with Millennium 120 MLC. Patient specific measurements were obtained using the PTW OCTAVIUS II system for all individual fields, while simultaneously recording the Dynalog file. Using an in‐house Matlab code, the dynalog data are converted to an adapted format of fluence map to Eclipse v8.9 treatment planning system. Using the Dynalog file based fluence maps we are able to calculate the dose for each field and the also to calculate the patient dose distribution. Comparisons of individual fields and of the patient 3D distribution were then performed and the analysis was based on gamma index passing rate for the individual fields, and DVH and dose differences for the patient dose distributions. Results: Our study confirms that the measured planar dose for individual fields has a good agreement to the calculated dose using the DMLC Dynalog file fluence maps. Filed by field analysis between detector measured and dynalog file fluence based calculations had 94.2% passing pixels using 3mm/3% criteria. Conclusion: Results show that the calculated dose based on Dynalog record is comparable to measured dose on PTW OCTAVIUS II detector. Gamma index values showed the reasonable dosimetric identity between two dose distributions.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate significance of gamma index between the measurement of 2D detector arrays and the calculated patient 3D dose distribution. Methods: DMLC (Dynamic Multi‐Leaf Collimator) of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radio Therapy) delivery information recorded in log files during delivery. The Dynalog file includes amongst other, the beam on and off status, segment dose index, and individual leaf positions. In this study, three previous treated IMRT patient plans are selected and delivered using a Varian CLINAC 600 C/D linear accelerator equipped with Millennium 120 MLC. Patient specific measurements were obtained using the PTW OCTAVIUS II system for all individual fields, while simultaneously recording the Dynalog file. Using an in‐house Matlab code, the dynalog data are converted to an adapted format of fluence map to Eclipse v8.9 treatment planning system. Using the Dynalog file based fluence maps we are able to calculate the dose for each field and the also to calculate the patient dose distribution. Comparisons of individual fields and of the patient 3D distribution were then performed and the analysis was based on gamma index passing rate for the individual fields, and DVH and dose differences for the patient dose distributions. Results: Our study confirms that the measured planar dose for individual fields has a good agreement to the calculated dose using the DMLC Dynalog file fluence maps. Filed by field analysis between detector measured and dynalog file fluence based calculations had 94.2% passing pixels using 3mm/3% criteria. Conclusion: Results show that the calculated dose based on Dynalog record is comparable to measured dose on PTW OCTAVIUS II detector. Gamma index values showed the reasonable dosimetric identity between two dose distributions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024801360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024801360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4814647

DO - 10.1118/1.4814647

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 253

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -