SU‐E‐I‐69

Improving Image Quality in Brain MRI Using Blade Sequences

P. Mavroidis, E. Lavdas, S. Kostopoulos, D. Glotsos, V. Roka, T. Topalzikis, A. Bakas, G. Oikonomou, Sotirios Stathakis, Nikos Papanikolaou, G. Batsikas, I. Kaffes, D. Kechagias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two types of sequences for brain MR examination of uncooperative and cooperative patients. For each group of patients, the pairs of sequences that were compared were two T2‐weighted (T2‐W) fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with different k‐space trajectories (conventional Cartesian and BLADE) and two T2‐TSE weighted (T2‐W) with different k‐space trajectories (conventional Cartesian and BLADE). Methods: Twenty three consecutive unccoperative patients and forty four cooperative patients, who routinely underwent brain MRI examination, participated in the study. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed based on the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and relative contrast (ReCon) measures of normal anatomic structures. The qualitative analysis was performed by experienced radiologists. Also, the presence of motion artifacts, other artifacts (e.g. Gibbs, susceptibility artifacts, phase encoding from vessels) and pulsatile flow artifacts was evaluated. Results: In the uncooperative group of patients, BLADE sequences were superior to the corresponding conventional sequences in all the cases. Furthermore, the differences were found to be statistically significant in almost all the cases. In the cooperative group of patients, BLADE sequences were superior to the conventional sequences with the differences of the CNR and ReCon values in nine cases being statistically significant. Furthermore, the BLADE sequences eliminated motion and other artifacts and T2 Flair BLADE sequences eliminated pulsatile flow artifacts. Conclusion: BLADE sequences (T2 TSE and T2 Flair) should be used in brain MR examinations of uncooperative patients. In cooperative patients, T2 TSE BLADE sequences may be used as part of the routine protocol and orbital examinations. T2 Flair BLADE sequences may be used optionally in examinations of AVM, orbits, hemorrhages, ventricular lesions, lesions in the frontal lobe, periventricular lesions, lesions in regions close to artifacts and lesions in posterior fossa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Artifacts
Brain
Pulsatile Flow
Sequence Inversion
Frontal Lobe
Orbit
Hemorrhage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Mavroidis, P., Lavdas, E., Kostopoulos, S., Glotsos, D., Roka, V., Topalzikis, T., ... Kechagias, D. (2013). SU‐E‐I‐69: Improving Image Quality in Brain MRI Using Blade Sequences. Medical Physics, 40(6), 141. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4814180

SU‐E‐I‐69 : Improving Image Quality in Brain MRI Using Blade Sequences. / Mavroidis, P.; Lavdas, E.; Kostopoulos, S.; Glotsos, D.; Roka, V.; Topalzikis, T.; Bakas, A.; Oikonomou, G.; Stathakis, Sotirios; Papanikolaou, Nikos; Batsikas, G.; Kaffes, I.; Kechagias, D.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2013, p. 141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mavroidis, P, Lavdas, E, Kostopoulos, S, Glotsos, D, Roka, V, Topalzikis, T, Bakas, A, Oikonomou, G, Stathakis, S, Papanikolaou, N, Batsikas, G, Kaffes, I & Kechagias, D 2013, 'SU‐E‐I‐69: Improving Image Quality in Brain MRI Using Blade Sequences', Medical Physics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 141. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4814180
Mavroidis P, Lavdas E, Kostopoulos S, Glotsos D, Roka V, Topalzikis T et al. SU‐E‐I‐69: Improving Image Quality in Brain MRI Using Blade Sequences. Medical Physics. 2013;40(6):141. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4814180
Mavroidis, P. ; Lavdas, E. ; Kostopoulos, S. ; Glotsos, D. ; Roka, V. ; Topalzikis, T. ; Bakas, A. ; Oikonomou, G. ; Stathakis, Sotirios ; Papanikolaou, Nikos ; Batsikas, G. ; Kaffes, I. ; Kechagias, D. / SU‐E‐I‐69 : Improving Image Quality in Brain MRI Using Blade Sequences. In: Medical Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 141.
@article{b8bbac438bd641fd9cdb0ab3e90db618,
title = "SU‐E‐I‐69: Improving Image Quality in Brain MRI Using Blade Sequences",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two types of sequences for brain MR examination of uncooperative and cooperative patients. For each group of patients, the pairs of sequences that were compared were two T2‐weighted (T2‐W) fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with different k‐space trajectories (conventional Cartesian and BLADE) and two T2‐TSE weighted (T2‐W) with different k‐space trajectories (conventional Cartesian and BLADE). Methods: Twenty three consecutive unccoperative patients and forty four cooperative patients, who routinely underwent brain MRI examination, participated in the study. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed based on the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and relative contrast (ReCon) measures of normal anatomic structures. The qualitative analysis was performed by experienced radiologists. Also, the presence of motion artifacts, other artifacts (e.g. Gibbs, susceptibility artifacts, phase encoding from vessels) and pulsatile flow artifacts was evaluated. Results: In the uncooperative group of patients, BLADE sequences were superior to the corresponding conventional sequences in all the cases. Furthermore, the differences were found to be statistically significant in almost all the cases. In the cooperative group of patients, BLADE sequences were superior to the conventional sequences with the differences of the CNR and ReCon values in nine cases being statistically significant. Furthermore, the BLADE sequences eliminated motion and other artifacts and T2 Flair BLADE sequences eliminated pulsatile flow artifacts. Conclusion: BLADE sequences (T2 TSE and T2 Flair) should be used in brain MR examinations of uncooperative patients. In cooperative patients, T2 TSE BLADE sequences may be used as part of the routine protocol and orbital examinations. T2 Flair BLADE sequences may be used optionally in examinations of AVM, orbits, hemorrhages, ventricular lesions, lesions in the frontal lobe, periventricular lesions, lesions in regions close to artifacts and lesions in posterior fossa.",
author = "P. Mavroidis and E. Lavdas and S. Kostopoulos and D. Glotsos and V. Roka and T. Topalzikis and A. Bakas and G. Oikonomou and Sotirios Stathakis and Nikos Papanikolaou and G. Batsikas and I. Kaffes and D. Kechagias",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1118/1.4814180",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "141",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐I‐69

T2 - Improving Image Quality in Brain MRI Using Blade Sequences

AU - Mavroidis, P.

AU - Lavdas, E.

AU - Kostopoulos, S.

AU - Glotsos, D.

AU - Roka, V.

AU - Topalzikis, T.

AU - Bakas, A.

AU - Oikonomou, G.

AU - Stathakis, Sotirios

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

AU - Batsikas, G.

AU - Kaffes, I.

AU - Kechagias, D.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two types of sequences for brain MR examination of uncooperative and cooperative patients. For each group of patients, the pairs of sequences that were compared were two T2‐weighted (T2‐W) fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with different k‐space trajectories (conventional Cartesian and BLADE) and two T2‐TSE weighted (T2‐W) with different k‐space trajectories (conventional Cartesian and BLADE). Methods: Twenty three consecutive unccoperative patients and forty four cooperative patients, who routinely underwent brain MRI examination, participated in the study. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed based on the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and relative contrast (ReCon) measures of normal anatomic structures. The qualitative analysis was performed by experienced radiologists. Also, the presence of motion artifacts, other artifacts (e.g. Gibbs, susceptibility artifacts, phase encoding from vessels) and pulsatile flow artifacts was evaluated. Results: In the uncooperative group of patients, BLADE sequences were superior to the corresponding conventional sequences in all the cases. Furthermore, the differences were found to be statistically significant in almost all the cases. In the cooperative group of patients, BLADE sequences were superior to the conventional sequences with the differences of the CNR and ReCon values in nine cases being statistically significant. Furthermore, the BLADE sequences eliminated motion and other artifacts and T2 Flair BLADE sequences eliminated pulsatile flow artifacts. Conclusion: BLADE sequences (T2 TSE and T2 Flair) should be used in brain MR examinations of uncooperative patients. In cooperative patients, T2 TSE BLADE sequences may be used as part of the routine protocol and orbital examinations. T2 Flair BLADE sequences may be used optionally in examinations of AVM, orbits, hemorrhages, ventricular lesions, lesions in the frontal lobe, periventricular lesions, lesions in regions close to artifacts and lesions in posterior fossa.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two types of sequences for brain MR examination of uncooperative and cooperative patients. For each group of patients, the pairs of sequences that were compared were two T2‐weighted (T2‐W) fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with different k‐space trajectories (conventional Cartesian and BLADE) and two T2‐TSE weighted (T2‐W) with different k‐space trajectories (conventional Cartesian and BLADE). Methods: Twenty three consecutive unccoperative patients and forty four cooperative patients, who routinely underwent brain MRI examination, participated in the study. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed based on the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and relative contrast (ReCon) measures of normal anatomic structures. The qualitative analysis was performed by experienced radiologists. Also, the presence of motion artifacts, other artifacts (e.g. Gibbs, susceptibility artifacts, phase encoding from vessels) and pulsatile flow artifacts was evaluated. Results: In the uncooperative group of patients, BLADE sequences were superior to the corresponding conventional sequences in all the cases. Furthermore, the differences were found to be statistically significant in almost all the cases. In the cooperative group of patients, BLADE sequences were superior to the conventional sequences with the differences of the CNR and ReCon values in nine cases being statistically significant. Furthermore, the BLADE sequences eliminated motion and other artifacts and T2 Flair BLADE sequences eliminated pulsatile flow artifacts. Conclusion: BLADE sequences (T2 TSE and T2 Flair) should be used in brain MR examinations of uncooperative patients. In cooperative patients, T2 TSE BLADE sequences may be used as part of the routine protocol and orbital examinations. T2 Flair BLADE sequences may be used optionally in examinations of AVM, orbits, hemorrhages, ventricular lesions, lesions in the frontal lobe, periventricular lesions, lesions in regions close to artifacts and lesions in posterior fossa.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024799238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024799238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4814180

DO - 10.1118/1.4814180

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 141

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -