SU‐C‐211‐05: Evaluation of the Dosimetric Effects of Delivering a VMAT Plan Optimized for a Straight‐Beam Linac on a Bent‐Beam Linac

N. Nayebi, C. Esquivel, A. Patel, R. Mckinsey, Nikos Papanikolaou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the dosimetric effects of delivering a VMAT plan optimized for a straight‐beam linac on a bent‐beam linac. Methods: When a linac is unavailable to treat, it is common practice to transfer patients to another machine that has been dosimetrically matched. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in the dose to organs at risk (OAR) and planned target volumes (PTV) due to a patient transfer from Clinac 600C/D to Clinac 23EX. The former is a straight beam machine (no bending magnet) and the latter has an achromatic bending magnet. Both machines are equipped with 120 Millennium MLCs. Nine VMAT plans (three treatment sites) originally optimized for the Clinac 600C/D were recalculated for the Clinac 23EX. Each plan was recomputed with the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system to deliver the same dose to the same treatment volume using the same number of monitor units for the entire treatment regime. To quantify the variations, the dose volume histograms (DVHs) for each plan, V50, mean and maximum dose to the OARs and PTV were compared. Results: The V50 of the OARs in the recalculated plan for the Clinac 23EX increased by an average of 15.2% (STD=15.1%). The increases on the maximum and mean dose to the OARs were on average 2.9±1.4% and 5.9±2.7% respectively. The maximum and mean PTV doses also increased for all of the 9 patients by 2.3±1.2% and 2.5±1.0%. Conclusions: The results indicated that the delivery of a VMAT plan for Clinac 600C/D on Clina c23EX will increase the dose to the PTVs and OARs. In cases where a patient is transferred to another machine for a single or small number of fractions, changes in dose distribution may be clinically insignificant; otherwise dosimetric evaluation of the transferred treatment to on another machine is highly recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3597
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Patient Transfer
Magnets
Organs at Risk
Therapeutics
Sexually Transmitted Diseases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐C‐211‐05 : Evaluation of the Dosimetric Effects of Delivering a VMAT Plan Optimized for a Straight‐Beam Linac on a Bent‐Beam Linac. / Nayebi, N.; Esquivel, C.; Patel, A.; Mckinsey, R.; Papanikolaou, Nikos.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2012, p. 3597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{59022c7e0e614e2781cec3de6dbe20d1,
title = "SU‐C‐211‐05: Evaluation of the Dosimetric Effects of Delivering a VMAT Plan Optimized for a Straight‐Beam Linac on a Bent‐Beam Linac",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the dosimetric effects of delivering a VMAT plan optimized for a straight‐beam linac on a bent‐beam linac. Methods: When a linac is unavailable to treat, it is common practice to transfer patients to another machine that has been dosimetrically matched. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in the dose to organs at risk (OAR) and planned target volumes (PTV) due to a patient transfer from Clinac 600C/D to Clinac 23EX. The former is a straight beam machine (no bending magnet) and the latter has an achromatic bending magnet. Both machines are equipped with 120 Millennium MLCs. Nine VMAT plans (three treatment sites) originally optimized for the Clinac 600C/D were recalculated for the Clinac 23EX. Each plan was recomputed with the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system to deliver the same dose to the same treatment volume using the same number of monitor units for the entire treatment regime. To quantify the variations, the dose volume histograms (DVHs) for each plan, V50, mean and maximum dose to the OARs and PTV were compared. Results: The V50 of the OARs in the recalculated plan for the Clinac 23EX increased by an average of 15.2{\%} (STD=15.1{\%}). The increases on the maximum and mean dose to the OARs were on average 2.9±1.4{\%} and 5.9±2.7{\%} respectively. The maximum and mean PTV doses also increased for all of the 9 patients by 2.3±1.2{\%} and 2.5±1.0{\%}. Conclusions: The results indicated that the delivery of a VMAT plan for Clinac 600C/D on Clina c23EX will increase the dose to the PTVs and OARs. In cases where a patient is transferred to another machine for a single or small number of fractions, changes in dose distribution may be clinically insignificant; otherwise dosimetric evaluation of the transferred treatment to on another machine is highly recommended.",
author = "N. Nayebi and C. Esquivel and A. Patel and R. Mckinsey and Nikos Papanikolaou",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1118/1.4734604",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "3597",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐C‐211‐05

T2 - Evaluation of the Dosimetric Effects of Delivering a VMAT Plan Optimized for a Straight‐Beam Linac on a Bent‐Beam Linac

AU - Nayebi, N.

AU - Esquivel, C.

AU - Patel, A.

AU - Mckinsey, R.

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the dosimetric effects of delivering a VMAT plan optimized for a straight‐beam linac on a bent‐beam linac. Methods: When a linac is unavailable to treat, it is common practice to transfer patients to another machine that has been dosimetrically matched. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in the dose to organs at risk (OAR) and planned target volumes (PTV) due to a patient transfer from Clinac 600C/D to Clinac 23EX. The former is a straight beam machine (no bending magnet) and the latter has an achromatic bending magnet. Both machines are equipped with 120 Millennium MLCs. Nine VMAT plans (three treatment sites) originally optimized for the Clinac 600C/D were recalculated for the Clinac 23EX. Each plan was recomputed with the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system to deliver the same dose to the same treatment volume using the same number of monitor units for the entire treatment regime. To quantify the variations, the dose volume histograms (DVHs) for each plan, V50, mean and maximum dose to the OARs and PTV were compared. Results: The V50 of the OARs in the recalculated plan for the Clinac 23EX increased by an average of 15.2% (STD=15.1%). The increases on the maximum and mean dose to the OARs were on average 2.9±1.4% and 5.9±2.7% respectively. The maximum and mean PTV doses also increased for all of the 9 patients by 2.3±1.2% and 2.5±1.0%. Conclusions: The results indicated that the delivery of a VMAT plan for Clinac 600C/D on Clina c23EX will increase the dose to the PTVs and OARs. In cases where a patient is transferred to another machine for a single or small number of fractions, changes in dose distribution may be clinically insignificant; otherwise dosimetric evaluation of the transferred treatment to on another machine is highly recommended.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the dosimetric effects of delivering a VMAT plan optimized for a straight‐beam linac on a bent‐beam linac. Methods: When a linac is unavailable to treat, it is common practice to transfer patients to another machine that has been dosimetrically matched. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in the dose to organs at risk (OAR) and planned target volumes (PTV) due to a patient transfer from Clinac 600C/D to Clinac 23EX. The former is a straight beam machine (no bending magnet) and the latter has an achromatic bending magnet. Both machines are equipped with 120 Millennium MLCs. Nine VMAT plans (three treatment sites) originally optimized for the Clinac 600C/D were recalculated for the Clinac 23EX. Each plan was recomputed with the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system to deliver the same dose to the same treatment volume using the same number of monitor units for the entire treatment regime. To quantify the variations, the dose volume histograms (DVHs) for each plan, V50, mean and maximum dose to the OARs and PTV were compared. Results: The V50 of the OARs in the recalculated plan for the Clinac 23EX increased by an average of 15.2% (STD=15.1%). The increases on the maximum and mean dose to the OARs were on average 2.9±1.4% and 5.9±2.7% respectively. The maximum and mean PTV doses also increased for all of the 9 patients by 2.3±1.2% and 2.5±1.0%. Conclusions: The results indicated that the delivery of a VMAT plan for Clinac 600C/D on Clina c23EX will increase the dose to the PTVs and OARs. In cases where a patient is transferred to another machine for a single or small number of fractions, changes in dose distribution may be clinically insignificant; otherwise dosimetric evaluation of the transferred treatment to on another machine is highly recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024811732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024811732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4734604

DO - 10.1118/1.4734604

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024811732

VL - 39

SP - 3597

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -