Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments: a paradigm shift in peri-implant biology.

David L Cochran, Lian Ping Mau, Frank L. Higginbottom, Thomas G. Wilson, Dieter D. Bosshardt, John Schoolfield, Archie A Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate the biologic width dimensions around implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Five canines had their mandibular premolars and first molars removed bilaterally and replaced with 12 implants that had nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. On one side, six implants were placed in a submerged surgical approach, and the other side utilized a nonsubmerged approach. Two of the implants on each side were placed either 1 mm above, even with, or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. Two months later, gold crowns were attached, and the dogs were sacrificed 6 months postloading. Block sections were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. The bone level, connective tissue length, epithelial dimension, and biologic width were not significantly different when the implants were initially placed in a submerged or nonsubmerged surgical approach. The bone level was significantly different around implants placed 1 mm above the crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. The connective tissue dimension was not different for any implant level placement. The epithelial dimension and biologic width were significantly greater for implants placed 1 mm below the alveolar crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm above the alveolar crest. For five of six implant placements, connective tissue covered the implant/abutment interface. This study reveals a fundamental change in the biologic response to implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Unlike implants with matching implant-abutment diameters, the connective tissue extended coronally past the interface (microgap). This morphologic tissue alteration represents a significant change in the biologic reaction to implant-abutment interfaces and suggests that marginal inflammation is eliminated or greatly reduced in these implant designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)494-502
Number of pages9
JournalThe International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants
Volume28
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Dental Implants
Connective Tissue
Canidae
Bone and Bones
Bicuspid
Crowns
Gold
Dogs
Inflammation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments : a paradigm shift in peri-implant biology. / Cochran, David L; Mau, Lian Ping; Higginbottom, Frank L.; Wilson, Thomas G.; Bosshardt, Dieter D.; Schoolfield, John; Jones, Archie A.

In: The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, Vol. 28, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 494-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{528038837df441ed9ed1ea07c2c98d7b,
title = "Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments: a paradigm shift in peri-implant biology.",
abstract = "To evaluate the biologic width dimensions around implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Five canines had their mandibular premolars and first molars removed bilaterally and replaced with 12 implants that had nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. On one side, six implants were placed in a submerged surgical approach, and the other side utilized a nonsubmerged approach. Two of the implants on each side were placed either 1 mm above, even with, or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. Two months later, gold crowns were attached, and the dogs were sacrificed 6 months postloading. Block sections were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. The bone level, connective tissue length, epithelial dimension, and biologic width were not significantly different when the implants were initially placed in a submerged or nonsubmerged surgical approach. The bone level was significantly different around implants placed 1 mm above the crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. The connective tissue dimension was not different for any implant level placement. The epithelial dimension and biologic width were significantly greater for implants placed 1 mm below the alveolar crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm above the alveolar crest. For five of six implant placements, connective tissue covered the implant/abutment interface. This study reveals a fundamental change in the biologic response to implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Unlike implants with matching implant-abutment diameters, the connective tissue extended coronally past the interface (microgap). This morphologic tissue alteration represents a significant change in the biologic reaction to implant-abutment interfaces and suggests that marginal inflammation is eliminated or greatly reduced in these implant designs.",
author = "Cochran, {David L} and Mau, {Lian Ping} and Higginbottom, {Frank L.} and Wilson, {Thomas G.} and Bosshardt, {Dieter D.} and John Schoolfield and Jones, {Archie A}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "494--502",
journal = "The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants",
issn = "0882-2786",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments

T2 - a paradigm shift in peri-implant biology.

AU - Cochran, David L

AU - Mau, Lian Ping

AU - Higginbottom, Frank L.

AU - Wilson, Thomas G.

AU - Bosshardt, Dieter D.

AU - Schoolfield, John

AU - Jones, Archie A

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - To evaluate the biologic width dimensions around implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Five canines had their mandibular premolars and first molars removed bilaterally and replaced with 12 implants that had nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. On one side, six implants were placed in a submerged surgical approach, and the other side utilized a nonsubmerged approach. Two of the implants on each side were placed either 1 mm above, even with, or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. Two months later, gold crowns were attached, and the dogs were sacrificed 6 months postloading. Block sections were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. The bone level, connective tissue length, epithelial dimension, and biologic width were not significantly different when the implants were initially placed in a submerged or nonsubmerged surgical approach. The bone level was significantly different around implants placed 1 mm above the crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. The connective tissue dimension was not different for any implant level placement. The epithelial dimension and biologic width were significantly greater for implants placed 1 mm below the alveolar crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm above the alveolar crest. For five of six implant placements, connective tissue covered the implant/abutment interface. This study reveals a fundamental change in the biologic response to implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Unlike implants with matching implant-abutment diameters, the connective tissue extended coronally past the interface (microgap). This morphologic tissue alteration represents a significant change in the biologic reaction to implant-abutment interfaces and suggests that marginal inflammation is eliminated or greatly reduced in these implant designs.

AB - To evaluate the biologic width dimensions around implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Five canines had their mandibular premolars and first molars removed bilaterally and replaced with 12 implants that had nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. On one side, six implants were placed in a submerged surgical approach, and the other side utilized a nonsubmerged approach. Two of the implants on each side were placed either 1 mm above, even with, or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. Two months later, gold crowns were attached, and the dogs were sacrificed 6 months postloading. Block sections were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. The bone level, connective tissue length, epithelial dimension, and biologic width were not significantly different when the implants were initially placed in a submerged or nonsubmerged surgical approach. The bone level was significantly different around implants placed 1 mm above the crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. The connective tissue dimension was not different for any implant level placement. The epithelial dimension and biologic width were significantly greater for implants placed 1 mm below the alveolar crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm above the alveolar crest. For five of six implant placements, connective tissue covered the implant/abutment interface. This study reveals a fundamental change in the biologic response to implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Unlike implants with matching implant-abutment diameters, the connective tissue extended coronally past the interface (microgap). This morphologic tissue alteration represents a significant change in the biologic reaction to implant-abutment interfaces and suggests that marginal inflammation is eliminated or greatly reduced in these implant designs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894385496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894385496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23527352

AN - SCOPUS:84894385496

VL - 28

SP - 494

EP - 502

JO - The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants

JF - The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants

SN - 0882-2786

IS - 2

ER -