TY - JOUR
T1 - Socioeconomic position, psychosocial work environment and cerebrovascular disease among women
T2 - The Finnish public sector study
AU - Kivimäki, Mika
AU - Gimeno, David
AU - Ferrie, Jane E.
AU - Batty, G. David
AU - Oksanen, Tuula
AU - Jokela, Markus
AU - Virtanen, Marianna
AU - Salo, Paula
AU - Akbaraly, Tasnime N.
AU - Elovainio, Marko
AU - Pentti, Jaana
AU - Vahtera, Jussi
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Background: The excess risk of fatal and non-fatal cerebrovascular disease in people from low socioeconomic positions is only partially explained by conventional cerebrovascular risk factors. This has led to the suggestion that poor psychosocial work environments provide important additional explanatory power. However, little evidence is available for women. Methods: We examined whether job demands or job control contributed to the socioeconomic gradient in cerebrovascular disease among 48 361 women aged 18-65 years. Job demands, job control and behavioural risk factors were self-reported in 2000-2002; socioeconomic position (as indexed by occupational class) and all of the health measures were obtained from registers. The outcome was recorded hospitalization or death from cerebrovascular disease. Results: During a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, 124 women had a new cerebrovascular disease event. The risk was 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-3.9) times higher among women in low vs high socioeconomic positions. Adjustment for conventional risk factors, such as prevalent hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and obesity, attenuated this excess risk by 23%. In contrast, adjustment for job demands and job control actually amplified the gradient by 36% suggesting a suppression effect. Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort of employed women, job demands - alone and in combination with job control - suppressed rather than explained socioeconomic differences in cerebrovascular disease.
AB - Background: The excess risk of fatal and non-fatal cerebrovascular disease in people from low socioeconomic positions is only partially explained by conventional cerebrovascular risk factors. This has led to the suggestion that poor psychosocial work environments provide important additional explanatory power. However, little evidence is available for women. Methods: We examined whether job demands or job control contributed to the socioeconomic gradient in cerebrovascular disease among 48 361 women aged 18-65 years. Job demands, job control and behavioural risk factors were self-reported in 2000-2002; socioeconomic position (as indexed by occupational class) and all of the health measures were obtained from registers. The outcome was recorded hospitalization or death from cerebrovascular disease. Results: During a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, 124 women had a new cerebrovascular disease event. The risk was 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-3.9) times higher among women in low vs high socioeconomic positions. Adjustment for conventional risk factors, such as prevalent hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and obesity, attenuated this excess risk by 23%. In contrast, adjustment for job demands and job control actually amplified the gradient by 36% suggesting a suppression effect. Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort of employed women, job demands - alone and in combination with job control - suppressed rather than explained socioeconomic differences in cerebrovascular disease.
KW - Cerebrovascular disorders
KW - Cohort studies
KW - Psychosocial factors
KW - Risk factors
KW - Socioeconomic status
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349494908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349494908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ije/dyn373
DO - 10.1093/ije/dyn373
M3 - Article
C2 - 19155280
AN - SCOPUS:70349494908
SN - 0300-5771
VL - 38
SP - 1265
EP - 1271
JO - International Journal of Epidemiology
JF - International Journal of Epidemiology
IS - 5
ER -