Skin testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with alternaria

John H. Krouse, Anand G Shah, Kristy Kerswill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Examine the efficacy of epicutaneous and intradermal testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with Alternaria antigen. Study Design and Setting: Prospective study. Subjects were tested with the Multi-Test II (MT) epicutaneous testing device. Subjects with negative wheals were then tested with a 1:500 weight:volume intradermal injection of Alternaria. They had baseline assessment of nasal cross-sectional area (CSA) using acoustic rhinometry and underwent nasal provocation with increasing Alternaria concentrations. CSA was assessed at each concentration. A nasal allergen provocation score (NAP) of nasal symptoms as well as a nasal visual analogue scale (VAS) were also completed with each concentration. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of MT in predicting nasal response to Alternaria were poor at 42% and 44%, respectively. The addition of intradermal testing increased sensitivity only modestly to 58%. hierarchical linear modeling analysis demonstrated that subjects positive to Alternaria on skin testing did not show a significant reduction in nasal CSA on acoustic rhinometry or significant elevations in two nasal symptom scores with direct nasal provocation. Conclusion and Significance: Skin testing with either epicutaneous or intradermal testing may not be an accurate or sufficient technique in the assessment of Alternaria reactivity. These results suggest that mold allergies may involve more complex immune mechanisms than simply an immunoglobulin (Ig)E mediated type I immediate hypersensitivity response alone. An alternate model for mold sensitivity, as well as modifications in testing methods, may be required in the evaluation of mold allergy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1389-1393
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume114
Issue number8 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Alternaria
Nose
Skin
Acoustic Rhinometry
Immediate Hypersensitivity
Fungi
Hypersensitivity
Intradermal Injections
Antigen-Antibody Complex
Visual Analog Scale
Allergens
Immunoglobulin E
Prospective Studies
Antigens
Weights and Measures
Sensitivity and Specificity
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Allergy
  • Alternaria
  • Rhinometry
  • Sensitivity
  • Skin testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Skin testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with alternaria. / Krouse, John H.; Shah, Anand G; Kerswill, Kristy.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 114, No. 8 I, 08.2004, p. 1389-1393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krouse, John H. ; Shah, Anand G ; Kerswill, Kristy. / Skin testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with alternaria. In: Laryngoscope. 2004 ; Vol. 114, No. 8 I. pp. 1389-1393.
@article{886aa19c8f214c7b980bbc13d3c9af60,
title = "Skin testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with alternaria",
abstract = "Objective: Examine the efficacy of epicutaneous and intradermal testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with Alternaria antigen. Study Design and Setting: Prospective study. Subjects were tested with the Multi-Test II (MT) epicutaneous testing device. Subjects with negative wheals were then tested with a 1:500 weight:volume intradermal injection of Alternaria. They had baseline assessment of nasal cross-sectional area (CSA) using acoustic rhinometry and underwent nasal provocation with increasing Alternaria concentrations. CSA was assessed at each concentration. A nasal allergen provocation score (NAP) of nasal symptoms as well as a nasal visual analogue scale (VAS) were also completed with each concentration. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of MT in predicting nasal response to Alternaria were poor at 42{\%} and 44{\%}, respectively. The addition of intradermal testing increased sensitivity only modestly to 58{\%}. hierarchical linear modeling analysis demonstrated that subjects positive to Alternaria on skin testing did not show a significant reduction in nasal CSA on acoustic rhinometry or significant elevations in two nasal symptom scores with direct nasal provocation. Conclusion and Significance: Skin testing with either epicutaneous or intradermal testing may not be an accurate or sufficient technique in the assessment of Alternaria reactivity. These results suggest that mold allergies may involve more complex immune mechanisms than simply an immunoglobulin (Ig)E mediated type I immediate hypersensitivity response alone. An alternate model for mold sensitivity, as well as modifications in testing methods, may be required in the evaluation of mold allergy.",
keywords = "Allergy, Alternaria, Rhinometry, Sensitivity, Skin testing",
author = "Krouse, {John H.} and Shah, {Anand G} and Kristy Kerswill",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/00005537-200408000-00013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "1389--1393",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "8 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skin testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with alternaria

AU - Krouse, John H.

AU - Shah, Anand G

AU - Kerswill, Kristy

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Objective: Examine the efficacy of epicutaneous and intradermal testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with Alternaria antigen. Study Design and Setting: Prospective study. Subjects were tested with the Multi-Test II (MT) epicutaneous testing device. Subjects with negative wheals were then tested with a 1:500 weight:volume intradermal injection of Alternaria. They had baseline assessment of nasal cross-sectional area (CSA) using acoustic rhinometry and underwent nasal provocation with increasing Alternaria concentrations. CSA was assessed at each concentration. A nasal allergen provocation score (NAP) of nasal symptoms as well as a nasal visual analogue scale (VAS) were also completed with each concentration. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of MT in predicting nasal response to Alternaria were poor at 42% and 44%, respectively. The addition of intradermal testing increased sensitivity only modestly to 58%. hierarchical linear modeling analysis demonstrated that subjects positive to Alternaria on skin testing did not show a significant reduction in nasal CSA on acoustic rhinometry or significant elevations in two nasal symptom scores with direct nasal provocation. Conclusion and Significance: Skin testing with either epicutaneous or intradermal testing may not be an accurate or sufficient technique in the assessment of Alternaria reactivity. These results suggest that mold allergies may involve more complex immune mechanisms than simply an immunoglobulin (Ig)E mediated type I immediate hypersensitivity response alone. An alternate model for mold sensitivity, as well as modifications in testing methods, may be required in the evaluation of mold allergy.

AB - Objective: Examine the efficacy of epicutaneous and intradermal testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with Alternaria antigen. Study Design and Setting: Prospective study. Subjects were tested with the Multi-Test II (MT) epicutaneous testing device. Subjects with negative wheals were then tested with a 1:500 weight:volume intradermal injection of Alternaria. They had baseline assessment of nasal cross-sectional area (CSA) using acoustic rhinometry and underwent nasal provocation with increasing Alternaria concentrations. CSA was assessed at each concentration. A nasal allergen provocation score (NAP) of nasal symptoms as well as a nasal visual analogue scale (VAS) were also completed with each concentration. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of MT in predicting nasal response to Alternaria were poor at 42% and 44%, respectively. The addition of intradermal testing increased sensitivity only modestly to 58%. hierarchical linear modeling analysis demonstrated that subjects positive to Alternaria on skin testing did not show a significant reduction in nasal CSA on acoustic rhinometry or significant elevations in two nasal symptom scores with direct nasal provocation. Conclusion and Significance: Skin testing with either epicutaneous or intradermal testing may not be an accurate or sufficient technique in the assessment of Alternaria reactivity. These results suggest that mold allergies may involve more complex immune mechanisms than simply an immunoglobulin (Ig)E mediated type I immediate hypersensitivity response alone. An alternate model for mold sensitivity, as well as modifications in testing methods, may be required in the evaluation of mold allergy.

KW - Allergy

KW - Alternaria

KW - Rhinometry

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Skin testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3843152869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3843152869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00013

DO - 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00013

M3 - Article

C2 - 15280713

AN - SCOPUS:3843152869

VL - 114

SP - 1389

EP - 1393

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 8 I

ER -