Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction?

R. A. Lange; L. D. Hillis; C. L. Grines

doi:10.1056/NEJM199610243351710

Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction?

R. A. Lange, L. D. Hillis, C. L. Grines

Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

62 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1311-1317
Number of pages	7
Journal	New England Journal of Medicine
Volume	335
Issue number	17
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199610243351710
State	Published - Oct 30 1996

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Access to Document

10.1056/NEJM199610243351710

Cite this

@article{e568bb8c5c75432b8b8e3db1be9dc05f,

title = "Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction?",

author = "Lange, {R. A.} and Hillis, {L. D.} and Grines, {C. L.}",

year = "1996",

month = oct,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1056/NEJM199610243351710",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "335",

pages = "1311--1317",

journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",

issn = "0028-4793",