Sensitivity study to evaluate the dosimetric impact of off-axis ratio profiles misalignment on tomotherapy second dose validation

Weihong He, A. Luis, Q. Vazquez, Chengyu Shi, Nikos Papanikolaou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate dose planning and delivery are very important in the intensity modulated radiation therapy. For helical TomoTherapy dose validation, a TomoTherapy second check software, called MU-Tomo, has been developed using archived patient documents, initial coordinates and planned dose of the point of calculation, and common dosimetric functions. Based on this software, sensitivity studies on 50 patient cases have been evaluated to show the impact of off-axis ratio profile misalignment on point dose calculation. Off-axis ratio is defined as the dose profile normalized to its maximum dose value. Sensitivity studies were done for three scenarios: oscillating the fluctuation regions of two off-axis profiles, shifting the profiles, and rotating the profiles. The result of the oscillation trial is linear along the change of longitudinal off-axis ratio (OARy), while oscillating the lateral off-axis ratio (OARx) has little influence on the dose calculation. For shifting, the variation in the percentage difference from the non-shifting value is about 15 times larger in OARy modification than in OARx modification. Rotating OARx by ±6° gave less than 1.5% ± 0.20% difference compared to the non-rotating value. Rotating OARy by ±1° changes the result more than 5% ± 2.69%. Therefore, for helical TomoTherapy dose validation, commissioned OARy profiles are more sensitive than OARx to oscillation, shifting and rotating. As a result, different tolerances for OARx and OARy may be required for annual quality assurance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)515-522
Number of pages8
JournalTechnology in Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume9
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Software
Radiotherapy

Keywords

  • Geometric uncertainties
  • Independent dose calculation
  • Off-axis ratio profile
  • Second check
  • Sensitivity
  • TomoTherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Sensitivity study to evaluate the dosimetric impact of off-axis ratio profiles misalignment on tomotherapy second dose validation. / He, Weihong; Luis, A.; Vazquez, Q.; Shi, Chengyu; Papanikolaou, Nikos.

In: Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Vol. 9, No. 5, 10.2010, p. 515-522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb6ba54cbb404ca493fd6dbb93e4347d,
title = "Sensitivity study to evaluate the dosimetric impact of off-axis ratio profiles misalignment on tomotherapy second dose validation",
abstract = "Accurate dose planning and delivery are very important in the intensity modulated radiation therapy. For helical TomoTherapy dose validation, a TomoTherapy second check software, called MU-Tomo, has been developed using archived patient documents, initial coordinates and planned dose of the point of calculation, and common dosimetric functions. Based on this software, sensitivity studies on 50 patient cases have been evaluated to show the impact of off-axis ratio profile misalignment on point dose calculation. Off-axis ratio is defined as the dose profile normalized to its maximum dose value. Sensitivity studies were done for three scenarios: oscillating the fluctuation regions of two off-axis profiles, shifting the profiles, and rotating the profiles. The result of the oscillation trial is linear along the change of longitudinal off-axis ratio (OARy), while oscillating the lateral off-axis ratio (OARx) has little influence on the dose calculation. For shifting, the variation in the percentage difference from the non-shifting value is about 15 times larger in OARy modification than in OARx modification. Rotating OARx by ±6° gave less than 1.5{\%} ± 0.20{\%} difference compared to the non-rotating value. Rotating OARy by ±1° changes the result more than 5{\%} ± 2.69{\%}. Therefore, for helical TomoTherapy dose validation, commissioned OARy profiles are more sensitive than OARx to oscillation, shifting and rotating. As a result, different tolerances for OARx and OARy may be required for annual quality assurance.",
keywords = "Geometric uncertainties, Independent dose calculation, Off-axis ratio profile, Second check, Sensitivity, TomoTherapy",
author = "Weihong He and A. Luis and Q. Vazquez and Chengyu Shi and Nikos Papanikolaou",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "515--522",
journal = "Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment",
issn = "1533-0346",
publisher = "Adenine Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity study to evaluate the dosimetric impact of off-axis ratio profiles misalignment on tomotherapy second dose validation

AU - He, Weihong

AU - Luis, A.

AU - Vazquez, Q.

AU - Shi, Chengyu

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Accurate dose planning and delivery are very important in the intensity modulated radiation therapy. For helical TomoTherapy dose validation, a TomoTherapy second check software, called MU-Tomo, has been developed using archived patient documents, initial coordinates and planned dose of the point of calculation, and common dosimetric functions. Based on this software, sensitivity studies on 50 patient cases have been evaluated to show the impact of off-axis ratio profile misalignment on point dose calculation. Off-axis ratio is defined as the dose profile normalized to its maximum dose value. Sensitivity studies were done for three scenarios: oscillating the fluctuation regions of two off-axis profiles, shifting the profiles, and rotating the profiles. The result of the oscillation trial is linear along the change of longitudinal off-axis ratio (OARy), while oscillating the lateral off-axis ratio (OARx) has little influence on the dose calculation. For shifting, the variation in the percentage difference from the non-shifting value is about 15 times larger in OARy modification than in OARx modification. Rotating OARx by ±6° gave less than 1.5% ± 0.20% difference compared to the non-rotating value. Rotating OARy by ±1° changes the result more than 5% ± 2.69%. Therefore, for helical TomoTherapy dose validation, commissioned OARy profiles are more sensitive than OARx to oscillation, shifting and rotating. As a result, different tolerances for OARx and OARy may be required for annual quality assurance.

AB - Accurate dose planning and delivery are very important in the intensity modulated radiation therapy. For helical TomoTherapy dose validation, a TomoTherapy second check software, called MU-Tomo, has been developed using archived patient documents, initial coordinates and planned dose of the point of calculation, and common dosimetric functions. Based on this software, sensitivity studies on 50 patient cases have been evaluated to show the impact of off-axis ratio profile misalignment on point dose calculation. Off-axis ratio is defined as the dose profile normalized to its maximum dose value. Sensitivity studies were done for three scenarios: oscillating the fluctuation regions of two off-axis profiles, shifting the profiles, and rotating the profiles. The result of the oscillation trial is linear along the change of longitudinal off-axis ratio (OARy), while oscillating the lateral off-axis ratio (OARx) has little influence on the dose calculation. For shifting, the variation in the percentage difference from the non-shifting value is about 15 times larger in OARy modification than in OARx modification. Rotating OARx by ±6° gave less than 1.5% ± 0.20% difference compared to the non-rotating value. Rotating OARy by ±1° changes the result more than 5% ± 2.69%. Therefore, for helical TomoTherapy dose validation, commissioned OARy profiles are more sensitive than OARx to oscillation, shifting and rotating. As a result, different tolerances for OARx and OARy may be required for annual quality assurance.

KW - Geometric uncertainties

KW - Independent dose calculation

KW - Off-axis ratio profile

KW - Second check

KW - Sensitivity

KW - TomoTherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049244889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049244889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20815423

AN - SCOPUS:78049244889

VL - 9

SP - 515

EP - 522

JO - Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment

JF - Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment

SN - 1533-0346

IS - 5

ER -