Self-reported checklist logs overestimate compliance with defibrillator inspections

Bruce D Adams, Eric Y. Baden, Irma T. Hartman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Improperly maintained cardiac defibrillators are an important cause of equipment failure during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council recommend that defibrillators be inspected each clinical shift to identify potential equipment failures. Most commonly, the results of this operator level inspection are logged manually onto a crash cart inspection checklist log. Unfortunately, this pen and paper log system relies on self-reported data, the shortcomings of which have been widely reported. We sought to investigate how accurately self-reported checklist logs reflect the true incidence of compliance with regularly required defibrillator inspections. The Lifepak® 12 defibrillator features a helpful option that can be utilized to verify whether the machine was turned on for the required operator function test. Using this feature, we objectively determined the true frequency of defibrillator inspections. We compared the frequency of missed inspections from the checklist log to that of the computerized archives feature for all hospital defibrillators. There was an overall inspection error rate of 3.7%. Of all missed inspections, 45.8% would not have been captured without this archives feature. This archives feature should prove useful for quality assurance efforts focused on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-34
Number of pages4
JournalQuality Assurance Journal
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Defibrillators
Checklist
Equipment Failure
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Heart Arrest
Incidence

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Defibrillators
  • Emergency service
  • Equipment safety
  • Self-reported data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

Self-reported checklist logs overestimate compliance with defibrillator inspections. / Adams, Bruce D; Baden, Eric Y.; Hartman, Irma T.

In: Quality Assurance Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, 03.2005, p. 31-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{54ff9b0a018f4e39811b0b02f9aebb30,
title = "Self-reported checklist logs overestimate compliance with defibrillator inspections",
abstract = "Improperly maintained cardiac defibrillators are an important cause of equipment failure during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council recommend that defibrillators be inspected each clinical shift to identify potential equipment failures. Most commonly, the results of this operator level inspection are logged manually onto a crash cart inspection checklist log. Unfortunately, this pen and paper log system relies on self-reported data, the shortcomings of which have been widely reported. We sought to investigate how accurately self-reported checklist logs reflect the true incidence of compliance with regularly required defibrillator inspections. The Lifepak{\circledR} 12 defibrillator features a helpful option that can be utilized to verify whether the machine was turned on for the required operator function test. Using this feature, we objectively determined the true frequency of defibrillator inspections. We compared the frequency of missed inspections from the checklist log to that of the computerized archives feature for all hospital defibrillators. There was an overall inspection error rate of 3.7{\%}. Of all missed inspections, 45.8{\%} would not have been captured without this archives feature. This archives feature should prove useful for quality assurance efforts focused on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.",
keywords = "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Defibrillators, Emergency service, Equipment safety, Self-reported data",
author = "Adams, {Bruce D} and Baden, {Eric Y.} and Hartman, {Irma T.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/qaj.305",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "31--34",
journal = "Quality Assurance Journal",
issn = "1087-8378",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-reported checklist logs overestimate compliance with defibrillator inspections

AU - Adams, Bruce D

AU - Baden, Eric Y.

AU - Hartman, Irma T.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Improperly maintained cardiac defibrillators are an important cause of equipment failure during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council recommend that defibrillators be inspected each clinical shift to identify potential equipment failures. Most commonly, the results of this operator level inspection are logged manually onto a crash cart inspection checklist log. Unfortunately, this pen and paper log system relies on self-reported data, the shortcomings of which have been widely reported. We sought to investigate how accurately self-reported checklist logs reflect the true incidence of compliance with regularly required defibrillator inspections. The Lifepak® 12 defibrillator features a helpful option that can be utilized to verify whether the machine was turned on for the required operator function test. Using this feature, we objectively determined the true frequency of defibrillator inspections. We compared the frequency of missed inspections from the checklist log to that of the computerized archives feature for all hospital defibrillators. There was an overall inspection error rate of 3.7%. Of all missed inspections, 45.8% would not have been captured without this archives feature. This archives feature should prove useful for quality assurance efforts focused on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

AB - Improperly maintained cardiac defibrillators are an important cause of equipment failure during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council recommend that defibrillators be inspected each clinical shift to identify potential equipment failures. Most commonly, the results of this operator level inspection are logged manually onto a crash cart inspection checklist log. Unfortunately, this pen and paper log system relies on self-reported data, the shortcomings of which have been widely reported. We sought to investigate how accurately self-reported checklist logs reflect the true incidence of compliance with regularly required defibrillator inspections. The Lifepak® 12 defibrillator features a helpful option that can be utilized to verify whether the machine was turned on for the required operator function test. Using this feature, we objectively determined the true frequency of defibrillator inspections. We compared the frequency of missed inspections from the checklist log to that of the computerized archives feature for all hospital defibrillators. There was an overall inspection error rate of 3.7%. Of all missed inspections, 45.8% would not have been captured without this archives feature. This archives feature should prove useful for quality assurance efforts focused on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Defibrillators

KW - Emergency service

KW - Equipment safety

KW - Self-reported data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14544268548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14544268548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/qaj.305

DO - 10.1002/qaj.305

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:14544268548

VL - 9

SP - 31

EP - 34

JO - Quality Assurance Journal

JF - Quality Assurance Journal

SN - 1087-8378

IS - 1

ER -