Abstract
Improperly maintained cardiac defibrillators are an important cause of equipment failure during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council recommend that defibrillators be inspected each clinical shift to identify potential equipment failures. Most commonly, the results of this operator level inspection are logged manually onto a crash cart inspection checklist log. Unfortunately, this pen and paper log system relies on self-reported data, the shortcomings of which have been widely reported. We sought to investigate how accurately self-reported checklist logs reflect the true incidence of compliance with regularly required defibrillator inspections. The Lifepak® 12 defibrillator features a helpful option that can be utilized to verify whether the machine was turned on for the required operator function test. Using this feature, we objectively determined the true frequency of defibrillator inspections. We compared the frequency of missed inspections from the checklist log to that of the computerized archives feature for all hospital defibrillators. There was an overall inspection error rate of 3.7%. Of all missed inspections, 45.8% would not have been captured without this archives feature. This archives feature should prove useful for quality assurance efforts focused on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 31-34 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Quality Assurance Journal |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- Defibrillators
- Emergency service
- Equipment safety
- Self-reported data
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pharmaceutical Science
- Leadership and Management
Cite this
Self-reported checklist logs overestimate compliance with defibrillator inspections. / Adams, Bruce D; Baden, Eric Y.; Hartman, Irma T.
In: Quality Assurance Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, 03.2005, p. 31-34.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-reported checklist logs overestimate compliance with defibrillator inspections
AU - Adams, Bruce D
AU - Baden, Eric Y.
AU - Hartman, Irma T.
PY - 2005/3
Y1 - 2005/3
N2 - Improperly maintained cardiac defibrillators are an important cause of equipment failure during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council recommend that defibrillators be inspected each clinical shift to identify potential equipment failures. Most commonly, the results of this operator level inspection are logged manually onto a crash cart inspection checklist log. Unfortunately, this pen and paper log system relies on self-reported data, the shortcomings of which have been widely reported. We sought to investigate how accurately self-reported checklist logs reflect the true incidence of compliance with regularly required defibrillator inspections. The Lifepak® 12 defibrillator features a helpful option that can be utilized to verify whether the machine was turned on for the required operator function test. Using this feature, we objectively determined the true frequency of defibrillator inspections. We compared the frequency of missed inspections from the checklist log to that of the computerized archives feature for all hospital defibrillators. There was an overall inspection error rate of 3.7%. Of all missed inspections, 45.8% would not have been captured without this archives feature. This archives feature should prove useful for quality assurance efforts focused on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
AB - Improperly maintained cardiac defibrillators are an important cause of equipment failure during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council recommend that defibrillators be inspected each clinical shift to identify potential equipment failures. Most commonly, the results of this operator level inspection are logged manually onto a crash cart inspection checklist log. Unfortunately, this pen and paper log system relies on self-reported data, the shortcomings of which have been widely reported. We sought to investigate how accurately self-reported checklist logs reflect the true incidence of compliance with regularly required defibrillator inspections. The Lifepak® 12 defibrillator features a helpful option that can be utilized to verify whether the machine was turned on for the required operator function test. Using this feature, we objectively determined the true frequency of defibrillator inspections. We compared the frequency of missed inspections from the checklist log to that of the computerized archives feature for all hospital defibrillators. There was an overall inspection error rate of 3.7%. Of all missed inspections, 45.8% would not have been captured without this archives feature. This archives feature should prove useful for quality assurance efforts focused on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW - Defibrillators
KW - Emergency service
KW - Equipment safety
KW - Self-reported data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14544268548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14544268548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/qaj.305
DO - 10.1002/qaj.305
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:14544268548
VL - 9
SP - 31
EP - 34
JO - Quality Assurance Journal
JF - Quality Assurance Journal
SN - 1087-8378
IS - 1
ER -